Neck River Elementary Parent Teachers Organization
Nonprofit profile at a glance
- EIN
- 061580579
- IRS 990-EZ coverage
- 2011–2024
- Forms available
- Form 990-EZ 2024, Form 990-N 2021
- Location
- Madison, CT, USA
- Phone
- 2032456460
- Rating
- 48
- Verdict
- MIXED
- Rating confidence
- Moderate
- Sector
- Parent/Teacher Group
Reported finances
- Revenue
- $141,860
- Expenses
- $110,863
- Assets
- $41,773
Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Amounts in USD.
Leadership & pay
11 people listed
Executive titles in this filing
- Amy Sutherland (CO-PRESIDENT)
- Laura Francis (CO-PRESIDENT)
- Lauren Miller (VICE PRESIDENT)
- Matt Joseff (VICE PRESIDENT)
People named in this filing
- Amy Sutherland (CO-PRESIDENT)
- Laura Francis (CO-PRESIDENT)
- Lauren Miller (VICE PRESIDENT)
Selected names, not a complete roster or a statement of current roles. Open leadership details for the complete filed list.
Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.
Overview
Mission
The objective of the pto shall be to create a closer relationship between home and school, to enhance the learning environment, to provide and maintain an open network of communication between the school and community, and to foster parent/guardian involvement in the
What it reported doing in 2024
Science Week: A tradition that has been ongoing for many years, Science Month is another opportunity to engage all students in multiple different workshops and assemblies all focused on the different areas in science. The PTO works closely with the faculty to incorporate hands-on experiments, engaging assemblies with the goal to get students excited about science. Some of the different programs we have had in the past include a visit from a traveling zoo, Mobile Steam Lab, and a local scientist who leads experiments within each class that are chosen by each grade level.
Operating model
- Revenue model
- Other-operating. 95% of the money available for current operations came from other operating revenue.
- Distribution model
- Direct operator. The filing allocates 100% of reported program-service expenses outside its grant, affiliate-payment, and member-benefit lines. This expense classification does not rule out separately announced grant awards.
The verdict
MIXED - The filed numbers largely add up and revenue has grown recently. A relatively small share of available resources goes toward mission work and a relatively small share of total spending goes to programs.
Rating breakdown
- Financial Efficiency: 20
- Transparency & Controls: 82
- Sustainability: 52
- Growth: 60
Detailed rating inputs
Financial Efficiency
- Mission deployment rate: 18.3%; rating input score 18
- Program expense ratio: 23.4%; rating input score 23
Transparency & Controls
- Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 52nd percentile among comparable filings
- Major donor itemization: Limited
Sustainability
- Operating margin: 21.9%; rating input score 76; 76th percentile among comparable filings
- Total-asset coverage ratio: 0.38; rating input score 30; 30th percentile among comparable filings
- Liabilities to assets ratio: Limited
- Officer compensation ratio: 0%; rating input score 63; 63rd percentile among comparable filings
Growth
- Program expense growth: -2.6% per year; rating input score 0; 23rd percentile among comparable filings
- Revenue growth: 10.9% per year; rating input score 100; 69th percentile among comparable filings
- Asset growth: 12.3% per year; rating input score 100; 67th percentile among comparable filings
Details
- Where the money goes: 18.3% of revenue deployed · 23.4% of spending went to programs
- Governance: Filed governance answers
- Accomplishments: 3 filed program accomplishments · $26K in reported program spending
- Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 11 people listed
- Consistency: 6 of 6 current checks pass
- Schedules: 3 filed schedules
- Filing history: 7 filing years from 2011 to 2024
- Contacts: How to reach this organization
- Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
- People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.
Key Signals
Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.
- High — Financial Efficiency: Mission deployment rate scored 18/100.
- High — Financial Efficiency: Program expense ratio scored 23/100.
- High — Growth: Program expense growth scored 0/100.
- Moderate — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 30/100.