Nebraska Choral Directors Association
Nonprofit profile at a glance
- EIN
- 900940830
- IRS 990-EZ coverage
- 2020–2024
- Forms available
- Form 990-EZ 2024
- Location
- Papillion, NE, USA
- Phone
- 4022080081
- Rating
- 90
- Verdict
- STRONG
- Rating confidence
- Moderate
- Sector
- Singing, Choral
- Affiliation
- Christianity
Reported finances
- Revenue
- $96,537
- Expenses
- $97,884
- Assets
- $76,038
Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Amounts in USD.
Leadership & pay
6 people listed
Executive titles in this filing
- BARINA CROSLAND (PRESIDENT)
- HUNTER BOE (PRESIDENT EL)
People named in this filing
- BARINA CROSLAND (PRESIDENT)
- SHELLY NIEWOHNER (SECRETARY)
- SARA COWAN (TREASURER)
Selected names, not a complete roster or a statement of current roles. Open leadership details for the complete filed list.
Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.
Overview
Mission
The Nebraska choral directors association is a non-profit professional organization whose membership is composed of choral musicians from schools, colleges, universities, churches, community and professional groups. As a chapter of the national organization ncda members are among 18,000 directors representing more than one million singers across the united states. Ncda events and publications provide Nebraska educators with opportunities in the choral field that surpass standard professional development. Members are interacting on twitter, facebook, google and other internet locations. We are truly engaged in 21st century learning, sharing innovative ideas and connecting in meaningful ways.
What it reported doing in 2024
Providing conferences for music teachers. During conferences, choral directors, educators, and professionals gather from all around Nebraska to share ideas, attend concerts, interest sessions, and renew their passion for choral music.
Operating model
- Revenue model
- Earned-program. 100% of the money available for current operations came from fees and other program revenue.
- Distribution model
- Direct operator. The filing allocates 100% of reported program-service expenses outside its grant, affiliate-payment, and member-benefit lines. This expense classification does not rule out separately announced grant awards.
The verdict
STRONG - A large share of available resources goes toward mission work and the filed numbers largely add up. Expenses are high relative to revenue and total assets are small relative to annual expenses; liquid coverage is unknown.
Rating breakdown
- Financial Efficiency: 100
- Transparency & Controls: 82
- Sustainability: 38
- Growth: 100
Detailed rating inputs
Financial Efficiency
- Mission deployment rate: 100%; rating input score 100
- Program expense ratio: 100%; rating input score 100
Transparency & Controls
- Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 52nd percentile among comparable filings
- Major donor itemization: Limited
Sustainability
- Operating margin: -1.4%; rating input score 41; 41st percentile among comparable filings
- Total-asset coverage ratio: 0.78; rating input score 40; 40th percentile among comparable filings
- Liabilities to assets ratio: Limited
- Officer compensation ratio: 0%; rating input score 56; 56th percentile among comparable filings
Growth
- Program expense growth: 22.2% per year; rating input score 100; 83rd percentile among comparable filings
- Revenue growth: 27.6% per year; rating input score 100; 93rd percentile among comparable filings
- Asset growth: 18.4% per year; rating input score 100; 85th percentile among comparable filings
Details
- Where the money goes: 100% of revenue deployed · 100% of spending went to programs
- Governance: Filed governance answers
- Accomplishments: 1 filed program accomplishment · $98K in reported program spending
- Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 6 people listed
- Consistency: 6 of 6 current checks pass
- Schedules: 2 filed schedules
- Filing history: 5 filing years from 2020 to 2024
- Contacts: How to reach this organization
- Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
- People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.
Key Signals
Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.
Grant-readiness screening is separate from the live rating, not a measure of program quality. Review the source records before making a grant decision.
- Moderate — Sustainability: Operating margin scored 41/100.
- Moderate — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 40/100.
- Review — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 56/100.
- High — Grant Readiness: Automatic revocation: this organization had its federal tax-exempt status automatically revoked.