Nebraska Afghan Community Center
Nonprofit profile at a glance
- EIN
- 922346391
- IRS 990 coverage
- 2024–2024
- Forms available
- Form 990 2024, Form 990-EZ 2023
- Location
- Omaha, NE, USA
- Phone
- 4029829279
- Rating
- 69
- Verdict
- SUPPORTED
- Rating confidence
- Moderate
- Sector
- Human Service Organizations
Reported finances
- Revenue
- $237,464
- Expenses
- $169,405
- Assets
- $208,839
- Liabilities
- $0
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Amounts in USD.
Leadership & pay
10 people listed
Executive titles in this filing
- Mohammad Sahil (Executive Director)
Highest reported compensation
- Mohammad Sahil (Executive Director): $45,302 total reported compensation
- Asia Mohammadi (Case Worker): $20,468 total reported compensation
- Ibadullah Maiwand (Administrative & Communication Coordinator): $13,934 total reported compensation
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.
Overview
Mission
The Nebraska Afghan Community Center (NACC) was established to provide assistance to Afghan families throughout Nebraska following the Afghan government's fall in August 2021. Nebraska Afghan Community Center (NACC) operates under five community initiatives. Each initiative has volunteers to deliver corresponding services and tasks. These initiatives include: Healthy Community (e.g., help with medical appointments, health education), Community Integration (e.g., community events), Community Self-Sufficiency (e.g., training for personal or public transportation in NE), Community Education (e.g., youth mentoring, cultural competencies, onsite or offsite ESL class or classes), and Capacity Building and Fundraising (e.g., donation collection and distribution, growing NACC's operations).
What it reported doing in 2024
Provided access to free recreational and educational programs, including but not limited to: Futsal tournaments, health education programming, transportation and home safety educational programming.
Operating model
- Revenue model
- Donor-supported. 89% of the money available for current operations came from contributions and gifts.
- Distribution model
- Direct operator. The filing allocates 100% of reported program-service expenses outside its grant, affiliate-payment, and member-benefit lines. This expense classification does not rule out separately announced grant awards.
The verdict
SUPPORTED - The filed numbers largely add up and most voting board members are independent. A relatively small share of available resources goes toward mission work and some filing-based governance responses are negative or unanswered.
Rating breakdown
- Financial Efficiency: 50
- Transparency & Controls: 92
- Accountability: 77
- Sustainability: 61
- Growth: 60
Detailed rating inputs
Financial Efficiency
- Mission deployment rate: 48.9%; rating input score 49
- Program expense ratio: 68.6%; rating input score 69
- Fundraising efficiency: Limited
Transparency & Controls
- Consistency checks: 90%; rating input score 90; 9th percentile among comparable filings
- Pay-setting controls: Limited
- Foreign activity oversight: Limited
- Grant itemization coverage: Limited
- Major donor itemization: Yes; rating input score 100
- Related-party transparency: Limited
Accountability
- Independent voting board: 100%; rating input score 100; 63rd percentile among comparable filings
- Governance controls: 4 of 9 controls in place; rating input score 44
- Conflict-of-interest policy: Pass
- Whistleblower policy: Fail
- Document-retention policy: Fail
- CEO compensation review process: Pass
- Other executive compensation review process: Pass
- Form 990 shared with the board: Fail
- Board meeting minutes documented: Pass
- Audit committee oversight: Missing
- Independent financial-statement audit: Fail
Sustainability
- Operating margin: 28.7%; rating input score 81; 81st percentile among comparable filings
- Total-asset coverage ratio: 1.23; rating input score 46; 46th percentile among comparable filings
- Liabilities to assets ratio: 0; rating input score 80; 80th percentile among comparable filings
- Officer compensation ratio: 59.5%; rating input score 2; 2nd percentile among comparable filings
Growth
- Program expense growth: Limited
- Revenue growth: 48.5% per year; rating input score 100; 97th percentile among comparable filings
- Asset growth: 38.9% per year; rating input score 100; 94th percentile among comparable filings
Details
- Where the money goes: 48.9% of revenue deployed · 68.6% of spending went to programs
- Governance: 5 of 5 board members independent · 4 of 9 filing controls reported
- Programs: 3 filed program accomplishments · $137K in reported program spending
- Leadership: top reported pay $45K · 10 people listed
- Consistency: 17 of 18 current checks pass · 1 finding to review
- Schedules: 3 filed schedules · includes major donors
- Contacts: How to reach this organization
- Money network: 9 filed money-flow records
- Related organizations: Filed and resolved organization relationships.
- Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
- People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.
Key Signals
Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.
- Moderate — Financial Efficiency: Mission deployment rate scored 49/100.
- Moderate — Accountability: Governance controls: 4 of 8 not reported.
- Moderate — Transparency & Controls: Schedule A contributions reconciliation did not reconcile in the filed values.
- Moderate — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 46/100.
- High — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 2/100.