Ncjc Housing & Development Foundation
Nonprofit profile at a glance
- EIN
- 263022138
- IRS 990 coverage
- 2013–2024
- Forms available
- Form 990 2024, Form 990-N 2010
- Location
- Orient, OH, USA
- Phone
- 6143346108
- Rating
- 68
- Verdict
- SUPPORTED
- Rating confidence
- Moderate
- Sector
- Housing Development, Construction, Management
Reported finances
- Revenue
- $3,425,217
- Expenses
- $1,308,079
- Assets
- $19,960,233
- Liabilities
- $987,995
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Amounts in USD.
Leadership & pay
11 people listed
Executive titles in this filing
- GREGORY H THIRTYACRE SR (PRESIDENT & CEO)
- KEAVIN HILL (SENIOR VICE PRESIDENT)
- GREGORY THIRTYACRE III (VICE PRESIDENT)
Highest reported compensation
- GREGORY H THIRTYACRE SR (PRESIDENT & CEO): $202,156 total reported compensation
- BRANDON HILL (COO (RETIRED 2024)): $80,430 total reported compensation
- GREGORY THIRTYACRE III (VICE PRESIDENT): $25,496 total reported compensation
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.
Overview
Mission
To purchase, develop, lease, finance and sell real property in order to create opportunities for ownership and affordable rental properties for low to moderate income and senior populations.
What it reported doing in 2024
Provide housing for low/moderate income people
Operating model
- Revenue model
- Mixed. Its operating money came from several sources; no one source provided a clear majority.
- Distribution model
- Direct operator. The filing allocates 100% of reported program-service expenses outside its grant, affiliate-payment, and member-benefit lines. This expense classification does not rule out separately announced grant awards.
The verdict
SUPPORTED - A large share of total spending goes to programs and the filed numbers largely add up. A relatively small share of available resources goes toward mission work and a relatively small share of voting board members are independent.
Rating breakdown
- Financial Efficiency: 61
- Transparency & Controls: 79
- Accountability: 52
- Sustainability: 82
- Growth: 100
Detailed rating inputs
Financial Efficiency
- Mission deployment rate: 56.8%; rating input score 57
- Program expense ratio: 86.6%; rating input score 87
- Fundraising efficiency: Limited
Transparency & Controls
- Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 63rd percentile among comparable filings
- Pay-setting controls: 2 of 6 controls in place; rating input score 33
- Compensation committee: Missing
- Independent consultant: Pass
- Other Form 990s reviewed: Missing
- Written employment contract: Missing
- Compensation survey or study: Missing
- Board or committee approval: Pass
- Foreign activity oversight: Limited
- Grant itemization coverage: Limited
- Major donor itemization: Yes; rating input score 100
- Related-party transparency: Limited
Accountability
- Independent voting board: 57.1%; rating input score 57; 9th percentile among comparable filings
- Governance controls: 4 of 9 controls in place; rating input score 44
- Conflict-of-interest policy: Pass
- Whistleblower policy: Fail
- Document-retention policy: Fail
- CEO compensation review process: Fail
- Other executive compensation review process: Fail
- Form 990 shared with the board: Fail
- Board meeting minutes documented: Pass
- Audit committee oversight: Pass
- Independent financial-statement audit: Pass
Sustainability
- Operating margin: 61.8%; rating input score 95; 95th percentile among comparable filings
- Total-asset coverage ratio: 15.26; rating input score 94; 94th percentile among comparable filings
- Liabilities to assets ratio: 0.05; rating input score 70; 70th percentile among comparable filings
- Officer compensation ratio: 24.5%; rating input score 8; 8th percentile among comparable filings
Growth
- Program expense growth: 26.6% per year; rating input score 100; 90th percentile among comparable filings
- Revenue growth: 21.8% per year; rating input score 100; 90th percentile among comparable filings
- Asset growth: 17.1% per year; rating input score 100; 79th percentile among comparable filings
Details
- Where the money goes: 56.8% of revenue deployed · 86.6% of spending went to programs
- Governance: 4 of 7 board members independent · 4 of 9 filing controls reported
- Programs: 1 filed program accomplishment · $1.1M in reported program spending
- Leadership: top reported pay $202K · 11 people listed · 2 of 6 pay-setting controls reported
- Consistency: 24 of 24 current checks pass
- Schedules: 6 filed schedules · includes major donors and executive pay
- Filing history: 11 filing years from 2013 to 2024
- Contacts: How to reach this organization
- Money network: 4 filed money-flow records
- Related organizations: 23 filed related-organization links
- Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
- People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.
Key Signals
Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.
- Review — Financial Efficiency: Mission deployment rate scored 57/100.
- Review — Accountability: Independent voting board scored 57/100.
- Moderate — Accountability: Governance controls: 5 of 9 not reported.
- High — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 8/100.