Nc Intensity Volleyball

Nonprofit profile at a glance

EIN
853542008
IRS 990-EZ coverage
2024–2025
Forms available
Form 990-EZ 2025
Location
Coats, NC, USA
Phone
8285502611
Rating
82
Verdict
STRONG
Rating confidence
Moderate
Sector
Amateur Sports

Reported finances

Revenue
$189,739
Expenses
$138,510
Assets
$139,698
Liabilities
$0

Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2025. Amounts in USD.

Leadership & pay

3 people listed

Executive titles in this filing

  • WALLACE SIMMONS (PRESIDENT/TREASURER)
  • ASHLEY GAINES (VICE PRESIDENT)

People named in this filing

  • WALLACE SIMMONS (PRESIDENT/TREASURER)
  • WENDY SIMMONS (SECRETARY/CLUB DIRECTOR)
  • ASHLEY GAINES (VICE PRESIDENT)

Selected names, not a complete roster or a statement of current roles. Open leadership details for the complete filed list.

Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2025. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.

Overview

Mission

Nc intensity's mission is to develop character, competence, courage, and confidence in young women through practice, participation, and working with others on a team. We improve the knowledge, skills, and abilities of young women between the ages of 10 - 18 in and around harnett county, North Carolina in the sport of volleyball.

What it reported doing in 2025

The organization uses contracted coaches and volunteer staff and coach young girls in local school gyms. Approximately 75 percent of the time is allocated to teaching the game of volleyball while the other 25 percent is for program management. The activity is funded through dues paid by the girls that join our club. Approximately 90 percent of our overall expense is allocated to coaching and training.

Operating model

Revenue model
Membership-supported. 97% of the money available for current operations came from membership dues.
Distribution model
Direct operator. The filing allocates 100% of reported program-service expenses outside its grant, affiliate-payment, and member-benefit lines. This expense classification does not rule out separately announced grant awards.

The verdict

STRONG - A large share of available resources goes toward mission work and the filed numbers largely add up. Total assets are small relative to annual expenses; liquid coverage is unknown and reported officer compensation is a large share of total spending, which may reflect staffing concentration.

Rating breakdown

  • Financial Efficiency: 82
  • Transparency & Controls: 82
  • Sustainability: 66
  • Growth: 100

Detailed rating inputs

Financial Efficiency

  • Mission deployment rate: 72.5%; rating input score 72
  • Program expense ratio: 99.3%; rating input score 99

Transparency & Controls

  • Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 52nd percentile among comparable filings
  • Major donor itemization: Limited

Sustainability

  • Operating margin: 27%; rating input score 79; 79th percentile among comparable filings
  • Total-asset coverage ratio: 1.01; rating input score 59; 59th percentile among comparable filings
  • Liabilities to assets ratio: 0; rating input score 74; 74th percentile among comparable filings
  • Officer compensation ratio: 5.9%; rating input score 23; 23rd percentile among comparable filings

Growth

  • Program expense growth: 19.5% per year; rating input score 100; 74th percentile among comparable filings
  • Revenue growth: 44% per year; rating input score 100; 94th percentile among comparable filings
  • Asset growth: 44.9% per year; rating input score 100; 91st percentile among comparable filings

Details

  • Where the money goes: 72.5% of revenue deployed · 99.3% of spending went to programs
  • Governance: Filed governance answers
  • Accomplishments: 1 filed program accomplishment · $138K in reported program spending
  • Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 3 people listed
  • Consistency: 8 of 8 current checks pass
  • Schedules: 2 filed schedules
  • Filing history: 2 filing years from 2024 to 2025
  • Contacts: How to reach this organization
  • Money network: 1 filed money-flow record
  • Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
  • People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.

Key Signals

Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.

  • Review — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 59/100.
  • High — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 23/100.