NAWBO-California
Nonprofit profile at a glance
- EIN
- 954582050
- IRS 990-EZ coverage
- 2010–2022
- Forms available
- Form 990-EZ 2022
- Location
- Los Alamitos, CA, USA
- Rating
- 51
- Verdict
- MIXED
- Rating confidence
- Moderate
- Sector
- Chambers of Commerce & Business Leagues
Reported finances
- Revenue
- $184,628
- Expenses
- $207,952
- Assets
- $109,600
- Liabilities
- $78,707
Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2022. Amounts in USD.
Leadership & pay
9 people listed
Executive titles in this filing
- Schenae Rourk (President)
People named in this filing
- Sandra Lee (Director)
- Laura Russell Jones (Director)
- Jennifer Dizon (Treasurer)
Selected names, not a complete roster or a statement of current roles. Open leadership details for the complete filed list.
Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2022. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.
Overview
Mission
The purpose of NAWBO-CA is to further the economic development of women business owners in California through education and leadership training.
What it reported doing in 2022
*Our 2023 Propel Your Business Conference was held over two days in May 2023 and attended by approximately 125 people. Newly added for 2023 was a Procurement Marketplace where attendees met with large companies to discuss and advise on procurement opportunities. *Hosted a series of NAWBO California Connects webinars including Access to Capital; How to Do Business with the State of California; Growing Your Business; Get Money for Your Business Today.*Continued visibility and sponsorship for local Chapters
Operating model
- Revenue model
- Cannot be determined from the filing. The filing does not provide enough consistent revenue detail to tell how this nonprofit funds its work.
- Distribution model
- Transfer-based 990-EZ. The 990-EZ reports grants or member benefits, but it does not separate enough spending to show the nonprofit’s full delivery mix.
The verdict
MIXED - The filed numbers largely add up and program spending has grown recently. A relatively small share of available resources goes toward mission work and expenses are high relative to revenue.
Rating breakdown
- Financial Efficiency: 9
- Transparency & Controls: 100
- Sustainability: 26
- Growth: 100
Detailed rating inputs
Financial Efficiency
- Mission deployment rate: 14.9%; rating input score 15
- Program expense ratio: Limited
Transparency & Controls
- Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 51st percentile among comparable filings
- Major donor itemization: Yes; rating input score 100
Sustainability
- Operating margin: -12.6%; rating input score 14; 14th percentile among comparable filings
- Total-asset coverage ratio: 0.53; rating input score 37; 37th percentile among comparable filings
- Liabilities to assets ratio: 0.72; rating input score 8; 8th percentile among comparable filings
- Officer compensation ratio: 0%; rating input score 64; 64th percentile among comparable filings
Growth
- Program expense growth: 2.2% per year; rating input score 100; 41st percentile among comparable filings
- Revenue growth: 6.5% per year; rating input score 100; 57th percentile among comparable filings
- Asset growth: 7.2% per year; rating input score 100; 50th percentile among comparable filings
Details
- Where the money goes: 14.9% of revenue deployed
- Governance: Filed governance answers
- Accomplishments: 1 filed program accomplishment
- Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 9 people listed
- Consistency: 6 of 6 current checks pass
- Schedules: 2 filed schedules
- Filing history: 12 filing years from 2010 to 2022
- Contacts: How to reach this organization
- Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
- People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.
Key Signals
Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.
- High — Financial Efficiency: Mission deployment rate scored 15/100.
- High — Sustainability: Operating margin scored 14/100.
- Moderate — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 37/100.
- High — Sustainability: Liabilities to assets ratio scored 8/100.