Naval Intelligence Professionals
Nonprofit profile at a glance
- EIN
- 541352724
- IRS 990 coverage
- 2011–2024
- Forms available
- Form 990 2024
- Location
- Burke, VA, USA
- Phone
- 7036271322
- Rating
- 81
- Verdict
- STRONG
- Rating confidence
- Moderate
Reported finances
- Revenue
- $184,098
- Expenses
- $173,911
- Assets
- $1,497,179
- Liabilities
- $0
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Amounts in USD.
Leadership & pay
18 people listed
Executive titles in this filing
- VADM RET ROBERT D SHARP (CEO and Chair)
- CAPT RET STEVEN L HORRELL (President)
Highest reported compensation
- SUE HIMES (Website ManagerEditor): $31,992 total reported compensation
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.
Overview
Mission
Public education and the importance of Naval Intelligence and intelligence community activities. Recognize and reward academic and operational achievement in the intelligence disciplines through charitable scholarships and individual award recognition programs. Hold meetings forums and maintain a website for exchange of ideas and discussions among past and present members of the Naval Intelligence and associated communities.
What it reported doing in 2024
International Affairs and National Security: The Naval Intelligence Professionals General Membership meeting and Fall Luncheon along with the Spring Luncheon aim to acknowledge analytic and leadership excellence. Special events are held to honor intelligence professionals lost in the 9 11 terrorist attacks. Recognition is given to outstanding performance by sailors and civilian members of the naval intelligence community with additional annual commemorative events.
Operating model
- Revenue model
- Mixed. Its operating money came from several sources; no one source provided a clear majority.
- Distribution model
- Cannot be determined from the filing. The filing does not provide enough consistent spending detail to tell whether the nonprofit works directly or through others.
The verdict
STRONG - A large share of available resources goes toward mission work and the filed numbers largely add up. Some filing-based governance responses are negative or unanswered and revenue has declined or grown slowly.
Rating breakdown
- Financial Efficiency: 84
- Transparency & Controls: 83
- Accountability: 82
- Sustainability: 62
- Growth: 60
Detailed rating inputs
Financial Efficiency
- Mission deployment rate: 92.7%; rating input score 93
- Program expense ratio: 98.1%; rating input score 98
- Fundraising efficiency: Limited
Transparency & Controls
- Consistency checks: 91.7%; rating input score 92; 19th percentile among comparable filings
- Pay-setting controls: Limited
- Foreign activity oversight: Limited
- Grant itemization coverage: Limited
- Major donor itemization: Limited
- Related-party transparency: Limited
Accountability
- Independent voting board: 100%; rating input score 100; 63rd percentile among comparable filings
- Governance controls: 4 of 7 controls in place; rating input score 57
- Conflict-of-interest policy: Pass
- Whistleblower policy: Pass
- Document-retention policy: Pass
- CEO compensation review process: NotApplicable
- Other executive compensation review process: NotApplicable
- Form 990 shared with the board: Fail
- Board meeting minutes documented: Pass
- Audit committee oversight: Missing
- Independent financial-statement audit: Fail
Sustainability
- Operating margin: 5.5%; rating input score 52; 52nd percentile among comparable filings
- Total-asset coverage ratio: 8.61; rating input score 88; 88th percentile among comparable filings
- Liabilities to assets ratio: 0; rating input score 80; 80th percentile among comparable filings
- Officer compensation ratio: 18.4%; rating input score 21; 21st percentile among comparable filings
Growth
- Program expense growth: 17.5% per year; rating input score 100; 82nd percentile among comparable filings
- Revenue growth: -4.1% per year; rating input score 0; 12th percentile among comparable filings
- Asset growth: 4.7% per year; rating input score 100; 46th percentile among comparable filings
Details
- Where the money goes: 92.7% of revenue deployed · 98.1% of spending went to programs
- Governance: 17 of 17 board members independent · 4 of 7 filing controls reported
- Programs: 3 filed program accomplishments · $168K in reported program spending
- Leadership: top reported pay $32K · 18 people listed
- Consistency: 38 of 41 current checks pass · 3 findings to review
- Schedules: 2 filed schedules
- Filing history: 6 filing years from 2011 to 2024
- Contacts: How to reach this organization
- Money network: 1 filed money-flow record
- Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
- People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.
Key Signals
Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.
- Review — Accountability: Governance controls: 2 of 6 not reported.
- High — Growth: Revenue growth scored 0/100.
- Review — Sustainability: Operating margin scored 52/100.
- Moderate — Transparency & Controls: Functional expense sum did not reconcile in the filed values.
- Moderate — Transparency & Controls: Part IX CompCurrentOfficersDirectors column sum did not reconcile in the filed values.
- Moderate — Transparency & Controls: Part IX OfficeExpenses column sum did not reconcile in the filed values.
- High — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 21/100.