Navair First Class Petty Officer Association
Nonprofit profile at a glance
- EIN
- 822596482
- IRS 990-EZ coverage
- 2020–2021
- Forms available
- Form 990-EZ 2021, Form 990-N 2019
- Location
- Patuxent River, MD, USA
- Phone
- 3017372199
- Rating
- 43
- Verdict
- MIXED
- Rating confidence
- Moderate
- Sector
- Military, Veterans' Organizations
Reported finances
- Revenue
- $3,000
- Expenses
- $0
- Assets
- $4,252
- Liabilities
- $0
Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2021. Amounts in USD.
Leadership & pay
7 people listed
Executive titles in this filing
- Michael Brause (PRESIDENT (acting))
- Michael Brause (VICE PRESIDENT)
People named in this filing
- Michael Brause (PRESIDENT (acting))
- Michael Brause (VICE PRESIDENT)
- Duane Mcgee (SECRETARY)
Selected names, not a complete roster or a statement of current roles. Open leadership details for the complete filed list.
Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2021. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.
Overview
Mission
Our mission is to enhance the social and professional interaction of Sailors, provide a forum for dealing with issues of interest to NAVAIR and NAS Patuxent River tenant Commands and provide an outlet for Association Members to become active in their local communities through volunteer work and community events; foster improved morale and esprit de corps; and put forth a positive image of the United States Armed Forces.
What it reported doing in 2021
Our mission is to enhance the social and professional interaction of Sailors, provide a forum for dealing with issues of interest to NAVAIR and NAS Patuxent River tenant Command's and provide an outlet for Association Members to become active in their local communities through volunteer work and community events; foster improved morale and esprit de corps; and put forth a positive image of the United States Armed Forces.
Operating model
- Revenue model
- Membership-supported. 100% of the money available for current operations came from membership dues.
- Distribution model
- No current program activity. The filing reports no program spending for the current year.
The verdict
MIXED - The filed numbers largely add up and revenue has grown recently. A relatively small share of available resources goes toward mission work and the available information about grant readiness automatic revocation leaves an important question unanswered.
Rating breakdown
- Financial Efficiency: 0
- Transparency & Controls: 100
- Sustainability: 8
- Growth: 60
Detailed rating inputs
Financial Efficiency
- Mission deployment rate: 0%; rating input score 0
- Program expense ratio: Limited
Transparency & Controls
- Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 51st percentile among comparable filings
- Major donor itemization: Yes; rating input score 100
Sustainability
- Operating margin: Limited
- Total-asset coverage ratio: Limited
- Liabilities to assets ratio: 0; rating input score 69; 69th percentile among comparable filings
- Officer compensation ratio: Limited
Growth
- Program expense growth: Limited
- Revenue growth: 142.8% per year; rating input score 100; 99th percentile among comparable filings
- Asset growth: 109% per year; rating input score 100; 99th percentile among comparable filings
Details
- Where the money goes: 0% of revenue deployed
- Governance: Filed governance answers
- Accomplishments: 1 filed program accomplishment
- Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 7 people listed
- Consistency: 9 of 9 current checks pass
- Schedules: 3 filed schedules
- Filing history: 2 filing years from 2020 to 2021
- Contacts: How to reach this organization
- Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
- People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.
Key Signals
Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.
Grant-readiness screening is separate from the live rating, not a measure of program quality. Review the source records before making a grant decision.
- High — Financial Efficiency: Mission deployment rate scored 0/100.
- High — Grant Readiness: Automatic revocation: this organization had its federal tax-exempt status automatically revoked.