Nautilus Sanctuary Inc
Nonprofit profile at a glance
- EIN
- 851396288
- IRS 990-EZ coverage
- 2025–2025
- Forms available
- Form 990-EZ 2025, Form 990-N 2024
- Location
- Brooklyn, NY, USA
- Phone
- 9175091497
- Rating
- 66
- Verdict
- SUPPORTED
- Rating confidence
- Moderate
- Sector
- Alliance/Advocacy Organizations
Reported finances
- Revenue
- $121,995
- Expenses
- $24,637
- Assets
- $150,591
- Liabilities
- $80
Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2025. Amounts in USD.
Leadership & pay
4 people listed
Executive titles in this filing
- Willa Hall (President)
People named in this filing
- Willa Hall (President)
- Alexander Belser (Board Member and Co Founder)
- Emily Horowitz (Board Member and Co Founder)
Selected names, not a complete roster or a statement of current roles. Open leadership details for the complete filed list.
Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2025. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.
Overview
Mission
To advance safe, effective, and ethical psychedelic-assisted therapy through research, practice, and training.
What it reported doing in 2025
Since 2020, Nautilus Sanctuary has focused its efforts on creating and launching an FDA- and IRB- approved study using MDMA-assisted therapy to treat post-traumatic stress symptoms in frontline healthcare workers and first responders. Funds collected have gone towards achieving regulatory approvals and fundraising goals. The study is on schedule to be launched in late 2026, early 2027 and will benefit/treat 30 frontline responders. In addition, the project aims to offer training opportunities to new MDMA therapists and provide video/audio taped material that can be processed into training materials for future psychedelic therapists.
Operating model
- Revenue model
- Donor-supported. 100% of the money available for current operations came from contributions and gifts.
- Distribution model
- Direct operator. The filing allocates 100% of reported program-service expenses outside its grant, affiliate-payment, and member-benefit lines. This expense classification does not rule out separately announced grant awards.
The verdict
SUPPORTED - The filed numbers largely add up and revenue comfortably covers expenses. A relatively small share of available resources goes toward mission work and liabilities are high compared with assets.
Rating breakdown
- Financial Efficiency: 43
- Transparency & Controls: 100
- Sustainability: 88
- Growth: NotEnoughData
Detailed rating inputs
Financial Efficiency
- Mission deployment rate: 17.4%; rating input score 17
- Program expense ratio: 86.3%; rating input score 86
Transparency & Controls
- Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 52nd percentile among comparable filings
- Major donor itemization: Yes; rating input score 100
Sustainability
- Operating margin: 79.8%; rating input score 98; 98th percentile among comparable filings
- Total-asset coverage ratio: 6.11; rating input score 97; 97th percentile among comparable filings
- Liabilities to assets ratio: 0; rating input score 47; 47th percentile among comparable filings
- Officer compensation ratio: 0%; rating input score 63; 63rd percentile among comparable filings
Growth
- Program expense growth: Limited
- Revenue growth: Limited
- Asset growth: Limited
Details
- Where the money goes: 17.4% of revenue deployed · 86.3% of spending went to programs
- Governance: Filed governance answers
- Accomplishments: 1 filed program accomplishment · $21K in reported program spending
- Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 4 people listed
- Consistency: 9 of 9 current checks pass
- Schedules: 3 filed schedules
- Contacts: How to reach this organization
- Money network: Resolved incoming and outgoing counterparties from filed money flows.
- Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
Key Signals
Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.
- High — Financial Efficiency: Mission deployment rate scored 17/100.
- Moderate — Sustainability: Liabilities to assets ratio scored 47/100.