Naugatuck Valley League Inc C/o David Dennehy St Paul Catholic

Nonprofit profile at a glance

EIN
205526182
IRS 990-EZ coverage
2013–2024
Forms available
Form 990-EZ 2024
Location
Bristol, CT, USA
Phone
8605840911
Rating
83
Verdict
STRONG
Rating confidence
Moderate
Sector
Amateur Sports
Affiliation
Christianity

Official website

Reported finances

Revenue
$121,350
Expenses
$119,226
Assets
$2,378

Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Amounts in USD.

Leadership & pay

17 people listed

Executive titles in this filing

  • BRIAN MARIANONAUGATUCK (PRESIDENT)

People named in this filing

  • DAVID DENNEHY ST PAUL (TREASURER)
  • MIKE MADDENST PAUL (TOURNAMENT D)
  • TOM BROCKETTANSONIA (DIRECTOR)

Selected names, not a complete roster or a statement of current roles. Open leadership details for the complete filed list.

Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.

Overview

Mission

Primary exempt purpose: the naugatuck valley league is dedicated to the task of providing standards, regulations, and procedures for the proper development and control of all sports activities for the children of its member schools.

What it reported doing in 2024

Tournaments - this program facilitates all post season sport tournaments for the children of its member schools. Activities include scheduling, coordination of officiating, coordination of playing facilities and coordination of event operations. Sports include football, boys cross country, girls cross country, girls swimming, volleyball, boys soccer, girls soccer, boys basketball, girls basketball, boys swimming, boys indoor track, girls indoor track, cheerleading, weightlifting, baseball, softball, boys track, girls track, boys tennis, girls tennis and golf.

Operating model

Revenue model
Mixed. Its operating money came from several sources; no one source provided a clear majority.
Distribution model
Direct operator. The filing allocates 100% of reported program-service expenses outside its grant, affiliate-payment, and member-benefit lines. This expense classification does not rule out separately announced grant awards.

The verdict

STRONG - A large share of available resources goes toward mission work and the filed numbers largely add up. Expenses are high relative to revenue and total assets are small relative to annual expenses; liquid coverage is unknown.

Rating breakdown

  • Financial Efficiency: 91
  • Transparency & Controls: 82
  • Sustainability: 23
  • Growth: 80

Detailed rating inputs

Financial Efficiency

  • Mission deployment rate: 90.1%; rating input score 90
  • Program expense ratio: 91.7%; rating input score 92

Transparency & Controls

  • Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 52nd percentile among comparable filings
  • Major donor itemization: Limited

Sustainability

  • Operating margin: 1.8%; rating input score 39; 39th percentile among comparable filings
  • Total-asset coverage ratio: 0.02; rating input score 5; 5th percentile among comparable filings
  • Liabilities to assets ratio: Limited
  • Officer compensation ratio: 3.5%; rating input score 24; 24th percentile among comparable filings

Growth

  • Program expense growth: 2.9% per year; rating input score 100; 40th percentile among comparable filings
  • Revenue growth: 0.4% per year; rating input score 100; 23rd percentile among comparable filings
  • Asset growth: -0.7% per year; rating input score 0; 25th percentile among comparable filings

Details

  • Where the money goes: 90.1% of revenue deployed · 91.7% of spending went to programs
  • Governance: Filed governance answers
  • Accomplishments: 1 filed program accomplishment · $109K in reported program spending
  • Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 17 people listed
  • Consistency: 6 of 6 current checks pass
  • Schedules: 2 filed schedules
  • Filing history: 12 filing years from 2013 to 2024
  • Contacts: How to reach this organization
  • Money network: 4 filed money-flow records
  • Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
  • People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.

Key Signals

Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.

  • Moderate — Sustainability: Operating margin scored 39/100.
  • High — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 5/100.
  • High — Growth: Asset growth scored 0/100.
  • High — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 24/100.