Natural Color Diamond Association Inc

Nonprofit profile at a glance

EIN
204073629
IRS 990-EZ coverage
2015–2022
Forms available
Form 990 2014, Form 990-EZ 2022
Location
New York, NY, USA
Phone
2126449747
Rating
49
Verdict
MIXED
Rating confidence
Moderate
Sector
Professional Societies, Associations

Official website

Reported finances

Revenue
$13,500
Expenses
$15,706
Assets
$0
Liabilities
$0

Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2022. Amounts in USD.

Leadership & pay

3 people listed

Executive titles in this filing

  • ALAN BRONSTEIN (PRESIDENT)
  • PAUL WILLIAMS (VICE PRESIDENT)

People named in this filing

  • ALAN BRONSTEIN (PRESIDENT)
  • EPHRAIM ZION (DIRECTOR)
  • PAUL WILLIAMS (VICE PRESIDENT)

Selected names, not a complete roster or a statement of current roles. Open leadership details for the complete filed list.

Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2022. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.

Overview

Mission

To train, enlighten and educate the global community about natural color diamonds.form 990-ez, part iii, line 28 - first accomplishmentcompletely updated all ncdia educational literature.held in-house seminars for ncdia members.held seminars at the ja New York summer show, jck las vegas show and the ags event.wrote and provided editorial/promotinal content for various publications. Held four quarterly board of director meetings and monthly committee meetings.

What it reported doing in 2022

See schedule o

Operating model

Revenue model
Donor-supported. 100% of the money available for current operations came from contributions and gifts.
Distribution model
Transfer-based 990-EZ. The 990-EZ reports grants or member benefits, but it does not separate enough spending to show the nonprofit’s full delivery mix.

The verdict

MIXED - The filed numbers largely add up. A relatively small share of available resources goes toward mission work and program spending has declined or grown slowly.

Rating breakdown

  • Financial Efficiency: 31
  • Transparency & Controls: 82
  • Sustainability: 20
  • Growth: 0

Detailed rating inputs

Financial Efficiency

  • Mission deployment rate: 49.9%; rating input score 50
  • Program expense ratio: Limited

Transparency & Controls

  • Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 51st percentile among comparable filings
  • Major donor itemization: Limited

Sustainability

  • Operating margin: -16.3%; rating input score 27; 27th percentile among comparable filings
  • Total-asset coverage ratio: 0; rating input score 2; 2nd percentile among comparable filings
  • Liabilities to assets ratio: Limited
  • Officer compensation ratio: 0%; rating input score 56; 56th percentile among comparable filings

Growth

  • Program expense growth: -20.2% per year; rating input score 0; 19th percentile among comparable filings
  • Revenue growth: -25.1% per year; rating input score 0; 13th percentile among comparable filings
  • Asset growth: -31.9% per year; rating input score 0; 6th percentile among comparable filings

Details

  • Where the money goes: 49.9% of revenue deployed
  • Governance: Filed governance answers
  • Accomplishments: 1 filed program accomplishment
  • Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 3 people listed
  • Consistency: 7 of 7 current checks pass
  • Schedules: 2 filed schedules
  • Filing history: 8 filing years from 2015 to 2022
  • Contacts: How to reach this organization
  • Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
  • People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.

Key Signals

Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.

  • Review — Financial Efficiency: Mission deployment rate scored 50/100.
  • High — Growth: Program expense growth scored 0/100.
  • High — Growth: Revenue growth scored 0/100.
  • High — Sustainability: Operating margin scored 27/100.
  • High — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 2/100.
  • High — Growth: Asset growth scored 0/100.
  • Review — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 56/100.