Natividad Medical Foundation
Nonprofit profile at a glance
- EIN
- 770194989
- IRS 990 coverage
- 2010–2024
- Forms available
- Form 990 2024, Form 990-T 2022
- Location
- Salinas, CA, USA
- Phone
- 8317554187
- Rating
- 59
- Verdict
- MIXED
- Rating confidence
- Moderate
- Sector
- Hospital, General
Reported finances
- Revenue
- $3,176,761
- Expenses
- $2,579,423
- Assets
- $6,971,469
- Liabilities
- $415,914
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Amounts in USD.
Leadership & pay
12 people listed
Executive titles in this filing
- JENNIFER WILLIAMS (President & CEO)
Highest reported compensation
- CHARLES HARRIS (Director): $560,506 total reported compensation
- CRAIG WALLS (Secretary): $487,018 total reported compensation
- MINERVA PEREZ (Director): $341,884 total reported compensation
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.
Overview
Mission
Natividad foundation brings people together to strengthen natividad and create a healthier community.together with our partners, we help natividad provide high-quality health care and trauma services for everyone in monterey county, including the vulnerable.
What it reported doing in 2024
Funds were granted to satisfy restrictions placed on contributions including support for medical equipment, spiritual care, assistance for survivors of violent crimes, medical staff education, and basic needs like patient transportation, medications, clothes, emergency shelter assistance, and transportation assistance (food and gas vouchers). - continued fundraising by the agricultural leadership council (talc) whose combined members have donated more than $5.1 million to natividad foundation since 2010 for medical equipment and cross-cultural initiatives. Over 700 pieces of critical medical equipment have been purchased with talc funds for different natividad units. - continued to fund choice, a violence intervention and prevention program modeled after the proven university of California, san franciscos wraparound project at san francisco general hospital. The choice program provides services to over 200 survivors of violent crimes yearly. Re-injury rate for victims of violence participating in choice has been maintained at 1% 2% in the past eight years, compared to the 5-year national average of 44%.- with donations from employees of monterey county and a combination of grants, natividad foundation continued to meet urgent, basic medical needs for vulnerable patients, including unhoused people, women, children, and people living with HIV/AIDS. Funds helped with the most basic needs, including food, clothing, medication, emergency shelter, and transportation for unhoused or underserved patients in the emergency department and mental health unit, among others; victims of child abuse and neglect at the child advocacy center; and mothers and babies at the labor & delivery and mother-infant units.- with eleventh year of grant funding from the community foundation for monterey county, provided diabetes prevention education to 164 low-income adults, with over a 63% retention rate, throughout monterey county through 5 steps to prevent diabetes program in a two-year period 5 steps continues to demonstrate meaningful positive changes in lifestyle behaviors correlated with reducing the risk of developing diabetes, including increased consumption of fruits and vegetables; increased daily physical activity; and increased use of strategies to eat healthfully with a limited income.- through natividad foundation, the hospital continued its health promotion program activities through the american association of diabetes educators-accredited diabetes education center. The diabetes education center is the first and only center of its kind in monterey county providing a free, culturally appropriate, low literacy, diabetes prevention education program focusing on underserved youth and adults with diabetes types 1 and 2, women with gestational diabetes and individuals with pre-diabetes. Clients of the diabetes education center are primarily latino (92%), spanish-speaking (61%) agricultural workers.- continued to assist the spiritual care program with the full-time spiritual care advisor, who is committed to ensuring the emotional and spiritual care needs of patients, their loved ones, and hospital staff are met.
Operating model
- Revenue model
- Donor-supported. 61% of the money available for current operations came from contributions and gifts.
- Distribution model
- Hybrid. The nonprofit split its reported program spending across 45% for direct work, and 55% for grants.
The verdict
MIXED - The filed numbers largely add up and program spending has grown recently. A relatively small share of voting board members are independent and a relatively small share of available resources goes toward mission work.
Rating breakdown
- Financial Efficiency: 51
- Transparency & Controls: 73
- Accountability: 42
- Sustainability: 65
- Growth: 100
Detailed rating inputs
Financial Efficiency
- Mission deployment rate: 52.3%; rating input score 52
- Program expense ratio: 59.8%; rating input score 60
- Fundraising efficiency: $5.1 raised per $1 spent on fundraising; rating input score 18; 18th percentile among comparable filings
Transparency & Controls
- Consistency checks: 94.1%; rating input score 94; 23rd percentile among comparable filings
- Pay-setting controls: 1 of 6 controls in place; rating input score 17
- Compensation committee: Pass
- Independent consultant: Missing
- Other Form 990s reviewed: Missing
- Written employment contract: Missing
- Compensation survey or study: Missing
- Board or committee approval: Missing
- Foreign activity oversight: Limited
- Grant itemization coverage: 100%; rating input score 100; 72nd percentile among comparable filings
- Major donor itemization: Yes; rating input score 100
- Related-party transparency: Limited
Accountability
- Independent voting board: 0%; rating input score 0; 3rd percentile among comparable filings
- Governance controls: 9 of 9 controls in place; rating input score 100
- Conflict-of-interest policy: Pass
- Whistleblower policy: Pass
- Document-retention policy: Pass
- CEO compensation review process: Pass
- Other executive compensation review process: Pass
- Form 990 shared with the board: Pass
- Board meeting minutes documented: Pass
- Audit committee oversight: Pass
- Independent financial-statement audit: Pass
Sustainability
- Operating margin: 18.8%; rating input score 75; 75th percentile among comparable filings
- Total-asset coverage ratio: 2.7; rating input score 71; 71st percentile among comparable filings
- Liabilities to assets ratio: 0.06; rating input score 67; 67th percentile among comparable filings
- Officer compensation ratio: 21.1%; rating input score 11; 11th percentile among comparable filings
Growth
- Program expense growth: 3.1% per year; rating input score 100; 28th percentile among comparable filings
- Revenue growth: 4.2% per year; rating input score 100; 35th percentile among comparable filings
- Asset growth: 12.4% per year; rating input score 100; 67th percentile among comparable filings
Details
- Where the money goes: 52.3% of revenue deployed · 59.8% of spending went to programs
- Governance: 0 of 11 board members independent · 9 of 9 filing controls reported
- Programs: 1 filed program accomplishment · $1.5M in reported program spending
- Leadership: top reported pay $561K · 12 people listed · 1 of 6 pay-setting controls reported
- Consistency: 30 of 31 current checks pass · 1 finding to review
- Schedules: 8 filed schedules · includes major donors, grants, and executive pay
- Filing history: 14 filing years from 2010 to 2024
- Contacts: How to reach this organization
- Money network: 3 filed money-flow records
- Related organizations: 2 filed related-organization links
- Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
- People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.
Key Signals
Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.
- High — Accountability: Independent voting board scored 0/100.
- Review — Financial Efficiency: Mission deployment rate scored 52/100.
- High — Financial Efficiency: Fundraising efficiency scored 18/100.
- High — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 11/100.
- Moderate — Transparency & Controls: Schedule A contributions reconciliation did not reconcile in the filed values.