Native Finance Development Corporation
Nonprofit profile at a glance
- EIN
- 831499750
- IRS 990 coverage
- 2024–2025
- Forms available
- Form 990 2025, Form 990-EZ 2023, Form 990-N 2022
- Location
- Vista, CA, USA
- Phone
- 6192006277
- Rating
- 80
- Verdict
- STRONG
- Rating confidence
- Moderate
- Sector
- Centers to Support the Independence of Specific Populations
Reported finances
- Revenue
- $347,112
- Expenses
- $405,652
- Assets
- $317,374
- Liabilities
- $259,271
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2025. Amounts in USD.
Leadership & pay
8 people listed
Highest reported compensation
- Cynthia Tam (Project Manager): $82,888 total reported compensation
- Eric Menzel (Project Coordinato): $27,851 total reported compensation
- Caroline Colton (Community Organize): $23,596 total reported compensation
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2025. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.
Overview
Mission
Emerging Native CDFI(Community Development Finance Institution)
What it reported doing in 2025
Project Update: Timeline: Project Duration: 36 monthsCurrent Stage: 18.5 months (as of 3/31/2025) Progress Summary: Year 2 Goals: On track. Between October 1, 2024, and March 31, 2025, we made 13 presentations to 102 community members from seven tribes (Campo, Jamul, La Jolla, La Posta, Manzanita, Pauma, and Viejas) and one Native community organization (Southern Indian Health Council). Not only are they now aware of our Native CDFI project, but all of them also signed a statement of support to build one in our community. Though we had anticipated 20-40 participants for our financial development services when we wrote our proposal in 2023, we actually have 51 participants, 5 of whom were referrals from the people who attended our presentations.Hired all key personnel including project manager, coordinator, financial planner, finance manager, program evaluator, and program reviewer.Community Engagement: Recruitment: Achieved 170% of target population for program development through presentations at 7 tribes and an Indian health clinic.Institutional Support: Secured support from three Tribal education committees (La Jolla, La Posta and Pauma) and the Jamul Casino with 1,300 employees.External Contributors: Secured ongoing technological support and introductions to Fortune 1000 insiders from Salesforce volunteers, a human-centric product design expert to assist with program design and delivery.Data Collection: Culturally Sensitive Interviews: Designed and vetted culturally sensitive, digitally secure quantitative information in collaboration with an Institutional Review Board certified consultant.Data stored in a secured and customized Salesforce cloud with assistance from a Salesforce volunteer.Marketing Strategy: Grassroots Approach: Employed a successful word-of-mouth strategy targeting individual tribal members based on banking status (fully banked, underbanked, unbanked).Social Media Outreach: Created content with videos and short posts for Linkedin, Tiktok, Instagram, and Facebook, in addition to our website.Stakeholder Engagement: Individual and Institutional Outreach: 7 tribes and an Indian health clinic as stated above.Grant Applications Though unsuccessful in obtaining additional grant funding, we have applied to San Manuel Cares (San Manuel Band of Mission Indians), and San Diego Chinese Womens Association.Awards: Selected as one of 36 semi-finalists among 1,600 global entrants in the 2024 MIT Solve Indigenous Communities Challenge.Financial Industry Recognition: Invited into and joined Save-On San Diego, a national Coalition of banks, financial institutions, and nonprofits committed to safe banking products and services.Staff Development: Staff strengthened their expertise in social impact investing, thought leadership, public relations, scaling growth, and digital marketing through Harvard Alumni Entrepreneur Academy programs.? Leveraged these programs to build relationships with international experts, strategically positioning Native Finance as a leading CDFI partner for Indian Country.Oweesta: Board Chairman, staff, and volunteer attended Native CDFI Practitioner trainings to enhance internal knowledge. Opportunity Finance Network: Board received training to strengthen the understanding of ethics and business model for CDFIs.Landmark Worldwide: Board and staff received training and development in communication and professional growth to sharpen listening and interpersonal skills.
Operating model
- Revenue model
- Grant-funded. 99% of the money available for current operations came from government grants.
- Distribution model
- Direct operator. The filing allocates 100% of reported program-service expenses outside its grant, affiliate-payment, and member-benefit lines. This expense classification does not rule out separately announced grant awards.
The verdict
STRONG - A large share of available resources goes toward mission work and the filed numbers largely add up. Some filing-based governance responses are negative or unanswered and expenses are high relative to revenue.
Rating breakdown
- Financial Efficiency: 89
- Transparency & Controls: 90
- Accountability: 69
- Sustainability: 18
- Growth: 60
Detailed rating inputs
Financial Efficiency
- Mission deployment rate: 100%; rating input score 100
- Program expense ratio: 100%; rating input score 100
- Fundraising efficiency: Limited
Transparency & Controls
- Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 64th percentile among comparable filings
- Pay-setting controls: Limited
- Foreign activity oversight: Limited
- Grant itemization coverage: Limited
- Major donor itemization: Limited
- Related-party transparency: Limited
Accountability
- Independent voting board: 100%; rating input score 100; 64th percentile among comparable filings
- Governance controls: 2 of 8 controls in place; rating input score 25
- Conflict-of-interest policy: Pass
- Whistleblower policy: Fail
- Document-retention policy: Fail
- CEO compensation review process: Pass
- Other executive compensation review process: NotApplicable
- Form 990 shared with the board: Fail
- Board meeting minutes documented: Fail
- Audit committee oversight: Missing
- Independent financial-statement audit: Fail
Sustainability
- Operating margin: -16.9%; rating input score 13; 13th percentile among comparable filings
- Total-asset coverage ratio: 0.78; rating input score 35; 35th percentile among comparable filings
- Liabilities to assets ratio: 0.82; rating input score 5; 5th percentile among comparable filings
- Officer compensation ratio: 37.1%; rating input score 7; 7th percentile among comparable filings
Growth
- Program expense growth: -21.8% per year; rating input score 0; 6th percentile among comparable filings
- Revenue growth: 38.9% per year; rating input score 100; 95th percentile among comparable filings
- Asset growth: 93.7% per year; rating input score 100; 99th percentile among comparable filings
Details
- Where the money goes: 100% of revenue deployed · 100% of spending went to programs
- Governance: 3 of 3 board members independent · 2 of 8 filing controls reported
- Programs: 1 filed program accomplishment · $406K in reported program spending
- Leadership: top reported pay $83K · 8 people listed
- Highest-paid contractors: 5 contractors listed · $49K reported
- Consistency: 17 of 17 current checks pass
- Schedules: 2 filed schedules
- Filing history: 2 filing years from 2024 to 2025
- Contacts: How to reach this organization
- Money network: 10 filed money-flow records
- Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
- People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.
Key Signals
Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.
- High — Accountability: Governance controls: 5 of 7 not reported.
- High — Sustainability: Operating margin scored 13/100.
- High — Growth: Program expense growth scored 0/100.
- Moderate — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 35/100.
- High — Sustainability: Liabilities to assets ratio scored 5/100.
- High — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 7/100.