Native & Nomadic Nations Cultural Relief Center
Legal name: Native and Nomadic Nations Cultural Relief Center
Nonprofit profile at a glance
- EIN
- 873827120
- IRS 990-EZ coverage
- 2021–2025
- Official website data refreshed
- Sep 2026
- Forms available
- Form 990-EZ 2025
- Location
- Kaunakakai, HI, USA
- Phone
- 8082138159
- Rating
- 70
- Verdict
- SUPPORTED
- Rating confidence
- Moderate
- Sector
- Interfaith Coalitions
- Affiliation
- Interfaith
Reported finances
- Revenue
- $9,012
- Expenses
- $15,147
- Assets
- $76,472
- Liabilities
- $44,811
Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2025. Amounts in USD.
Leadership & pay
2 people listed
Executive titles in this filing
- Antonio Moreno (President)
People named in this filing
- Antonio Moreno (President)
- Sofia Saitova (Manager)
Selected names, not a complete roster or a statement of current roles. Open leadership details for the complete filed list.
Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2025. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.
Overview
Mission
To preserve the unique variety of cultures and views. To save native cultures, to prevent nations extinction. To find and support talented individuals and assist them in education and career. We especially focus on those persons affected from nature and humanitarian catastrophes.
What it reported doing in 2025
In 2025, the organization conducted educational activities focused on agricultural sustainability and community-based food production. The program included both theoretical and hands-on instruction in developing and maintaining sustainable vegetable-growing systems, including installation of planting beds, irrigation systems, and ongoing cultivation and harvesting practices. These activities were designed to promote local self-sufficiency and environmentally responsible land use. The organization also provided educational lectures for the local community, including weekly philosophy discussions led by Antonio Moreno. These lectures aimed to support cultural education, critical thinking, and community engagement, while reflecting diverse cultural perspectives. Program activities included the provision of necessary materials and supplies to support educational workshops and practical training sessions.
Operating model
- Revenue model
- Donor-supported. 99% of the money available for current operations came from contributions and gifts.
- Distribution model
- Direct operator. The filing allocates 100% of reported program-service expenses outside its grant, affiliate-payment, and member-benefit lines. This expense classification does not rule out separately announced grant awards.
The verdict
SUPPORTED - The filed numbers largely add up and a large share of available resources goes toward mission work. A relatively small share of total spending goes to programs and expenses are high relative to revenue.
Rating breakdown
- Financial Efficiency: 60
- Transparency & Controls: 82
- Sustainability: 37
- Growth: 100
Detailed rating inputs
Financial Efficiency
- Mission deployment rate: 71.3%; rating input score 71
- Program expense ratio: 41.9%; rating input score 42
Transparency & Controls
- Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 51st percentile among comparable filings
- Major donor itemization: Limited
Sustainability
- Operating margin: -68.1%; rating input score 10; 10th percentile among comparable filings
- Total-asset coverage ratio: 5.05; rating input score 84; 84th percentile among comparable filings
- Liabilities to assets ratio: 0.59; rating input score 7; 7th percentile among comparable filings
- Officer compensation ratio: 0%; rating input score 56; 56th percentile among comparable filings
Growth
- Program expense growth: 66.6% per year; rating input score 100; 94th percentile among comparable filings
- Revenue growth: 10.7% per year; rating input score 100; 81st percentile among comparable filings
- Asset growth: 51.4% per year; rating input score 100; 95th percentile among comparable filings
Details
- What they do: 10 programs and campaigns described on the official site · 4 operating locations identified
- Where the money goes: 71.3% of revenue deployed · 41.9% of spending went to programs
- Governance: Filed governance answers
- Accomplishments: 1 filed program accomplishment · $6K in reported program spending
- Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 2 people listed
- Consistency: 9 of 9 current checks pass
- Schedules: 2 filed schedules
- Filing history: 5 filing years from 2021 to 2025
- Contacts: How to reach this organization
- Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
- People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.
Key Signals
Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.
- Moderate — Financial Efficiency: Program expense ratio scored 42/100.
- High — Sustainability: Operating margin scored 10/100.
- High — Sustainability: Liabilities to assets ratio scored 7/100.
- Review — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 56/100.