Native Americans in Philanthropy
Nonprofit profile at a glance
- EIN
- 561849598
- IRS 990 coverage
- 2012–2024
- Forms available
- Form 990 2024
- Location
- Washington, DC, USA
- Phone
- 2029910468
- Rating
- 77
- Verdict
- SUPPORTED
- Rating confidence
- Moderate
- Sector
- Civil Rights, Social Action, Advocacy N.E.C.
Reported finances
- Revenue
- $14,041,600
- Expenses
- $11,674,251
- Assets
- $21,404,578
- Liabilities
- $801,297
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Amounts in USD.
Leadership & pay
20 people listed
Executive titles in this filing
- Erik Stegman (Chief Executive Officer/Secretary)
- Brittany Schulman (Senior Vice President of Programs)
- Joel Tumyeptseyo Moffett (Vice President of Tribal Nations Engagement)
- Roseanne Maria David (Chief of Staff to the CEO)
Highest reported compensation
- Erik Stegman (Chief Executive Officer/Secretary): $279,522 total reported compensation
- Jeanette Ziegler (Chief Operating Officer): $251,467 total reported compensation
- Brittany Schulman (Senior Vice President of Programs): $210,987 total reported compensation
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.
Overview
Mission
Native Americans in Philanthropy advocates, educates, convenes and innovates to dramatically increase philanthropic investments in Native communities and transform the philanthropic sector's relationship with Indigenous communities.
What it reported doing in 2024
Research and DataResearch and data play a key role in philanthropy, often determining who receives funding and whether certain programs are considered successful. NAP is a hub for Indigenous leadership in philanthropic data and advocates for more accurate and timely data on Indigenous communities and for supporting Indigenous research practices. The Research and Data team has partnered with Candid to address data inaccuracies regarding Indigenous people in philanthropic records. Our team systematically reviewed existing grant records that support Indigenous communities, peoples, or organizations, correcting misinformation that persists both within and outside philanthropy. The goal of this project is to ensure Indigenous peoples are accurately represented and that philanthropy relies on precise data about Indigenous communities. This year, our team reviewed and corrected approximately 500 records, with plans to expand this work in the coming year. Beyond data correction, we amplify Indigenous voices through organizational reports and research initiatives. This year, we completed two significant reports: First, "Elevating Indigenous Voices in the 21st Century Child Welfare Research Agenda" identifies priority areas within the child welfare system that advances appropriate, responsive, and community-driven practices. Second, "The Impact and Opportunity of Investing Native Communities." report authored by the Bridgespan Group with guidance from Native Americans in Philanthropy, serves as a foundational resource drawing on insights from more than 40 Native community leaders across the United States. This report emphasizes the resilience of Native initiatives while illuminating strategic opportunities for philanthropic investment, unlocking significant impact across Tribal Nations and Native organizations, ultimately strengthening community capacity and self-determination throughout Indian Country. Engagement and EducationOur research and data team has also facilitated workshops using the "5Rs of Indigenous Philanthropy" discussion card deck, developed by our Director of Research and Education. These workshops foster meaningful engagement between Indigenous peoples and non-Native philanthropic partners, building knowledge and facilitating conversations rarely held in traditional philanthropic spaces. We conducted workshops at four conferences in 2025, with plans for four additional workshops in 2026. Seeds of ConnectionIn Fall 2023, Native Americans in Philanthropy released Indigenous Centered, a report exploring the relationship between community foundations and Native communities across the U.S., with recommendations to strengthen accountability to Native peoples. Building on this, the Seeds of Connection project offers place-based workshops that foster mutual learning and relationship-building between Tribal communities and community foundations. These workshops aim to identify collaboration opportunities and align Indigenous priorities with regional philanthropic efforts. Additionally, the Seeds of Connection community of practice serves as a support network for Indigenous leaders and philanthropic partners to connect, share knowledge, and deepen investment in Native communities.Grounded in the findings and recommendations of the "Indigenous Centered" report; in February of 2025 NAP hosted a two-day gathering of Indigenous Community Leaders and Community Foundation Leaders. The two-day event featured place-based learning, facilitated dialogue, and collaborative activities designed to deepen relationships and foster shared understanding. Seeds of Connection offered a space to explore partnership models rooted in mutual respect, trust, and collective growth.In addition to the Seeds of Connection gathering, NAP also partnered with the Oklahoma City Community Foundation to fund an additional four to five Native organizations across the state of Oklahoma, as a part of the Carolyn Watson Rural Oklahoma Grant Program. Looking ahead, w
Operating model
- Revenue model
- Donor-supported. 92% of the money available for current operations came from contributions and gifts.
- Distribution model
- Hybrid. The nonprofit split its reported program spending across 48% for direct work, and 52% for grants.
The verdict
SUPPORTED - A large share of available resources goes toward mission work and the filed numbers largely add up. Fundraising costs are high for each dollar raised and some filing-based governance responses are negative or unanswered.
Rating breakdown
- Financial Efficiency: 64
- Transparency & Controls: 83
- Accountability: 90
- Sustainability: 66
- Growth: 100
Detailed rating inputs
Financial Efficiency
- Mission deployment rate: 61.3%; rating input score 61
- Program expense ratio: 73.2%; rating input score 73
- Fundraising efficiency: $19.38 raised per $1 spent on fundraising; rating input score 56; 56th percentile among comparable filings
Transparency & Controls
- Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 62nd percentile among comparable filings
- Pay-setting controls: 3 of 6 controls in place; rating input score 50
- Compensation committee: Missing
- Independent consultant: Pass
- Other Form 990s reviewed: Missing
- Written employment contract: Missing
- Compensation survey or study: Pass
- Board or committee approval: Pass
- Foreign activity oversight: Limited
- Grant itemization coverage: 99.9%; rating input score 100; 38th percentile among comparable filings
- Major donor itemization: Yes; rating input score 100
- Related-party transparency: Limited
Accountability
- Independent voting board: 90%; rating input score 90; 22nd percentile among comparable filings
- Governance controls: 8 of 9 controls in place; rating input score 89
- Conflict-of-interest policy: Pass
- Whistleblower policy: Pass
- Document-retention policy: Pass
- CEO compensation review process: Pass
- Other executive compensation review process: Fail
- Form 990 shared with the board: Pass
- Board meeting minutes documented: Pass
- Audit committee oversight: Pass
- Independent financial-statement audit: Pass
Sustainability
- Operating margin: 16.9%; rating input score 79; 79th percentile among comparable filings
- Total-asset coverage ratio: 1.83; rating input score 59; 59th percentile among comparable filings
- Liabilities to assets ratio: 0.04; rating input score 86; 86th percentile among comparable filings
- Officer compensation ratio: 12.4%; rating input score 13; 13th percentile among comparable filings
Growth
- Program expense growth: 23.9% per year; rating input score 100; 92nd percentile among comparable filings
- Revenue growth: 24.7% per year; rating input score 100; 95th percentile among comparable filings
- Asset growth: 25.8% per year; rating input score 100; 94th percentile among comparable filings
Details
- Where the money goes: 61.3% of revenue deployed · 73.2% of spending went to programs
- Governance: 9 of 10 board members independent · 8 of 9 filing controls reported
- Programs: 3 filed program accomplishments · $8.5M in reported program spending
- Leadership: top reported pay $280K · 20 people listed · 3 of 6 pay-setting controls reported
- Highest-paid contractors: 5 contractors listed · $1.7M reported
- Consistency: 34 of 34 current checks pass
- Schedules: 6 filed schedules · includes major donors, grants, and executive pay
- Filing history: 13 filing years from 2012 to 2024
- Contacts: How to reach this organization
- Money network: 26 filed money-flow records
- Related organizations: 18 filed related-organization links
- Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
- People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.
Key Signals
Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.
- Review — Financial Efficiency: Fundraising efficiency scored 56/100.
- Review — Accountability: Governance controls: Other executive compensation review process not reported.
- Review — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 59/100.
- High — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 13/100.