Native American Community Clinic
Nonprofit profile at a glance
- EIN
- 030445789
- IRS 990 coverage
- 2010–2024
- Forms available
- Form 990 2024
- Location
- Minneapolis, MN, USA
- Phone
- 6128728086
- Rating
- 82
- Verdict
- STRONG
- Rating confidence
- Standard
- Sector
- Community Health Systems
Reported finances
- Revenue
- $17,598,389
- Expenses
- $18,321,475
- Assets
- $15,899,880
- Liabilities
- $6,564,463
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Amounts in USD.
Leadership & pay
23 people listed
Executive titles in this filing
- DR ANTONY STATELY (CEO)
Highest reported compensation
- DR ANTONY STATELY (CEO): $318,345 total reported compensation
- EMILY PIETIG (DENTAL DIRECTOR): $268,352 total reported compensation
- DR KARIE RABIE (CMO): $258,628 total reported compensation
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.
Overview
Mission
To promote wellness and regular health maintenance in native american families, to decrease health disparity in the native americans in the metro area, and to provide access to quality care regardless of ability to pay.
What it reported doing in 2024
Provides medical, dental, behavioral health and chemical health services to native american families and patients. The organization had 15,535 visits during 2024. In addition the organization provides care to patients, who meet certain criteria under the organizations charity care policy without charge or at amounts less than established rates. The organization believes the underserved are those persons who are unable through private resources, employer support or public aid to provide payment for health care services or those unable to gain access to health related care because of limited resources, inadequate education, or discrimination. Because the organization does not pursue collections of amounts determined to qualify as charity care, such amounts are not reported as revenue.
Operating model
- Revenue model
- Mixed. Its operating money came from several sources; no one source provided a clear majority.
- Distribution model
- Direct operator. The filing allocates 100% of reported program-service expenses outside its grant, affiliate-payment, and member-benefit lines. This expense classification does not rule out separately announced grant awards.
- Includes noncash contributions: Reported contributions include donated property or goods.
The verdict
STRONG - A large share of available resources goes toward mission work and the filed numbers largely add up. Expenses are high relative to revenue and total assets are small relative to annual expenses; liquid coverage is unknown.
Rating breakdown
- Financial Efficiency: 70
- Transparency & Controls: 91
- Accountability: 100
- Sustainability: 24
- Growth: 100
Detailed rating inputs
Financial Efficiency
- Mission deployment rate: 71.3%; rating input score 71
- Program expense ratio: 68.4%; rating input score 68
- Fundraising efficiency: $46.13 raised per $1 spent on fundraising; rating input score 74; 74th percentile among comparable filings
Transparency & Controls
- Consistency checks: 94.4%; rating input score 94; 22nd percentile among comparable filings
- Pay-setting controls: 5 of 6 controls in place; rating input score 83
- Compensation committee: Pass
- Independent consultant: Pass
- Other Form 990s reviewed: Pass
- Written employment contract: Missing
- Compensation survey or study: Pass
- Board or committee approval: Pass
- Foreign activity oversight: Limited
- Grant itemization coverage: Limited
- Major donor itemization: Yes; rating input score 100
- Related-party transparency: Limited
Accountability
- Independent voting board: 100%; rating input score 100; 66th percentile among comparable filings
- Governance controls: 9 of 9 controls in place; rating input score 100
- Conflict-of-interest policy: Pass
- Whistleblower policy: Pass
- Document-retention policy: Pass
- CEO compensation review process: Pass
- Other executive compensation review process: Pass
- Form 990 shared with the board: Pass
- Board meeting minutes documented: Pass
- Audit committee oversight: Pass
- Independent financial-statement audit: Pass
Sustainability
- Operating margin: -4.1%; rating input score 18; 18th percentile among comparable filings
- Total-asset coverage ratio: 0.87; rating input score 31; 31st percentile among comparable filings
- Liabilities to assets ratio: 0.41; rating input score 36; 36th percentile among comparable filings
- Officer compensation ratio: 11.5%; rating input score 15; 15th percentile among comparable filings
Growth
- Program expense growth: 16.6% per year; rating input score 100; 86th percentile among comparable filings
- Revenue growth: 14.8% per year; rating input score 100; 86th percentile among comparable filings
- Asset growth: 17.6% per year; rating input score 100; 86th percentile among comparable filings
Details
- Where the money goes: 71.3% of revenue deployed · 68.4% of spending went to programs
- Governance: 11 of 11 board members independent · 9 of 9 filing controls reported
- Programs: 1 filed program accomplishment · $12.5M in reported program spending
- Leadership: top reported pay $318K · 23 people listed · 5 of 6 pay-setting controls reported
- Highest-paid contractors: 5 contractors listed · $2.7M reported
- Consistency: 39 of 40 current checks pass · 1 finding to review
- Schedules: 9 filed schedules · includes major donors and executive pay
- Filing history: 14 filing years from 2010 to 2024
- Contacts: How to reach this organization
- Money network: 11 filed money-flow records
- Related organizations: 1 filed related-organization link
- Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
- People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.
Key Signals
Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.
- High — Sustainability: Operating margin scored 18/100.
- Moderate — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 31/100.
- High — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 15/100.
- Review — Transparency & Controls: Schedule R controlled transactions itemized did not reconcile in the filed values.
- Moderate — Sustainability: Liabilities to assets ratio scored 36/100.