Native Alliance of the Sierra Nevada Foothills
Nonprofit profile at a glance
- EIN
- 270359215
- IRS 990 coverage
- 2011–2024
- Forms available
- Form 990 2024, Form 990-N 2009
- Location
- Auburn, CA, USA
- Phone
- 5308888767
- Rating
- 83
- Verdict
- STRONG
- Rating confidence
- Moderate
- Sector
- Centers to Support the Independence of Specific Populations
Reported finances
- Revenue
- $1,377,122
- Expenses
- $1,377,074
- Assets
- $512,346
- Liabilities
- $136,495
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Amounts in USD.
Leadership & pay
5 people listed
People named in this filing
- ROGER GROGHAN (CHAIR PERSON)
- SHELI MEYLOR (VICE CHAIR)
- JEREMY STEPHENS (TREASURER)
Selected names, not a complete roster or a statement of current roles. Open leadership details for the complete filed list.
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.
Overview
Mission
The organization's mission is to empower native youth and families through education, cultural resources and environmental activities. The organization provides culturally relevant youth development education and family support services on a daily basis.
What it reported doing in 2024
The organization's mission is to empower native youth and families through education, cultural resources, and environmental activities. The organization provides culturally relevant family support and youth wellness activities on a daily basis. Direct support is also provided to assistfamilies with housing stability and basic needs. Sierra native alliance (sna) provides culturally relevant counseling, education, and substance use services for an average of 500 native american youth and families per year. Sna provides indian child welfare (icwa) advocacy to address disproportionality for native families, facilitates child family team meetings, and provides consultation and training for public and private partners to improve child welfare outcomes. Sna family wellness program provide family strengthening and preservation services, including positive indian parenting, families of tradition, and traditional indian health. Violence prevention services include anger management, women's healing circle, and court approved men's and women's 53-week domestic violence classes. Group, family, individual and school- based behavioral health counseling services are provides, along with home visitation for families with children ages 0-5. Sna has a state certified outpatient substance use treatment program that provides integrated behavioral health and traditional health services for co-occurring needs, with groups and activities to support families recovering together. Sna provides peer support and advocacy for justice involved participants to access resources needed for success. Sna youth programs provide youth wellness groups 3 times per week, along with annual youth camp that is attended by 100 youth each year. Mentoring and home visitation services are provided to support families at risk for separation, to help native children stay safely in their homes. In 2024, sna youth programs were highlighted in a best practices video to demonstrate the role of culture in youth substance use prevention. Sna peer educators also promoted the never a bother youth suicide prevention campaign. Sna produced bill boards, video public service announcements in the theatres, social media posts, and newspaper adds; and engaged youth in prevention education activities at community events. Snas psa won first place in a statewide youth suicide prevention media challenge. Sna youth leaders also assisted with the planning and facilitation of community outreach, education and cultural events. Our 17th annual auburn big time-pow wow was attended by 3,500 participants this year.
Operating model
- Revenue model
- Grant-funded. 71% of the money available for current operations came from government grants.
- Distribution model
- Direct operator. The filing allocates 100% of reported program-service expenses outside its grant, affiliate-payment, and member-benefit lines. This expense classification does not rule out separately announced grant awards.
The verdict
STRONG - A large share of available resources goes toward mission work and the filed numbers largely add up. Some filing-based governance responses are negative or unanswered and expenses are high relative to revenue.
Rating breakdown
- Financial Efficiency: 87
- Transparency & Controls: 92
- Accountability: 70
- Sustainability: 35
- Growth: 100
Detailed rating inputs
Financial Efficiency
- Mission deployment rate: 89.1%; rating input score 89
- Program expense ratio: 89.1%; rating input score 89
- Fundraising efficiency: $35.25 raised per $1 spent on fundraising; rating input score 72; 72nd percentile among comparable filings
Transparency & Controls
- Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 63rd percentile among comparable filings
- Pay-setting controls: Limited
- Foreign activity oversight: Limited
- Grant itemization coverage: Limited
- Major donor itemization: Yes; rating input score 100
- Related-party transparency: Limited
Accountability
- Independent voting board: 100%; rating input score 100; 63rd percentile among comparable filings
- Governance controls: 2 of 7 controls in place; rating input score 29
- Conflict-of-interest policy: Pass
- Whistleblower policy: Fail
- Document-retention policy: Fail
- CEO compensation review process: NotApplicable
- Other executive compensation review process: NotApplicable
- Form 990 shared with the board: Fail
- Board meeting minutes documented: Pass
- Audit committee oversight: Missing
- Independent financial-statement audit: Fail
Sustainability
- Operating margin: 0%; rating input score 36; 36th percentile among comparable filings
- Total-asset coverage ratio: 0.37; rating input score 17; 17th percentile among comparable filings
- Liabilities to assets ratio: 0.27; rating input score 27; 27th percentile among comparable filings
- Officer compensation ratio: 0%; rating input score 81; 81st percentile among comparable filings
Growth
- Program expense growth: 10.4% per year; rating input score 100; 64th percentile among comparable filings
- Revenue growth: 8.2% per year; rating input score 100; 60th percentile among comparable filings
- Asset growth: 11.1% per year; rating input score 100; 62nd percentile among comparable filings
Details
- Where the money goes: 89.1% of revenue deployed · 89.1% of spending went to programs
- Governance: 5 of 5 board members independent · 2 of 7 filing controls reported
- Programs: 1 filed program accomplishment · $1.2M in reported program spending
- Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 5 people listed
- Consistency: 21 of 21 current checks pass
- Schedules: 4 filed schedules · includes major donors
- Filing history: 13 filing years from 2011 to 2024
- Contacts: How to reach this organization
- Money network: Resolved incoming and outgoing counterparties from filed money flows.
- Related organizations: Filed and resolved organization relationships.
- Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
- People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.
Key Signals
Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.
- High — Accountability: Governance controls: 4 of 6 not reported.
- Moderate — Sustainability: Operating margin scored 36/100.
- High — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 17/100.
- High — Sustainability: Liabilities to assets ratio scored 27/100.