Nations in Action Globally Lifting Up Fund Inc

Nonprofit profile at a glance

EIN
823714288
IRS 990-EZ coverage
2018–2024
Forms available
Form 990-EZ 2024, Form 990-N 2023
Location
Lantana, FL, USA
Phone
7703183868
Rating
84
Verdict
STRONG
Rating confidence
Moderate
Sector
Research Institutes and Public Policy Analysis

Reported finances

Revenue
$70,000
Expenses
$37,323
Assets
$59,031
Liabilities
$71

Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Amounts in USD.

Leadership & pay

3 people listed

Executive titles in this filing

  • MARIA ZACK (PRESIDENT)

People named in this filing

  • MARIA ZACK (PRESIDENT)
  • STEPHEN ZACK (SECRETARY)
  • NATALIE OLNI (VICE PRESIDE)

Selected names, not a complete roster or a statement of current roles. Open leadership details for the complete filed list.

Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.

Overview

Mission

The nations in action globally lifting up (glu) foundation was founded on the principle that in order for a community to thrive, the families within that community must be productive members enjoying the fruits of liberty and freedom. The organization performs research and development of policies that will create and secure a civil society rooted in constitutional governance.

What it reported doing in 2024

Nia conducted extensive training sessions and gathered signed pledges from many candidates and elected officials throughout the world. Nations in action representatives met with top influencers, one of whom prompted elon musk's tweet to audit and the start of doge. Nia is predominantly focused on gaining individuals, groups and elected officials to sign the ggg pledge signers. We present solutions to candidates and elected officials at all levels of government. Our work has prompted these candidates and elected officials to implement and call on others to do the same, regulatorily, administratively and legislatively. The accomplishments are remarkable with candidates including presidential and former candidates in multiple countries support and are demanding other countries also implement ggg us elected officials are now drafting legislation with a Georgia state rep. Allowing nia to draft the bills with for the 2026 legislative session.

Operating model

Revenue model
Donor-supported. 100% of the money available for current operations came from contributions and gifts.
Distribution model
Direct operator. The filing allocates 100% of reported program-service expenses outside its grant, affiliate-payment, and member-benefit lines. This expense classification does not rule out separately announced grant awards.

The verdict

STRONG - The filed numbers largely add up and a large share of total spending goes to programs. A relatively small share of available resources goes toward mission work and total assets are small relative to annual expenses; liquid coverage is unknown.

Rating breakdown

  • Financial Efficiency: 71
  • Transparency & Controls: 100
  • Sustainability: 70
  • Growth: 100

Detailed rating inputs

Financial Efficiency

  • Mission deployment rate: 53.2%; rating input score 53
  • Program expense ratio: 99.7%; rating input score 100

Transparency & Controls

  • Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 52nd percentile among comparable filings
  • Major donor itemization: Yes; rating input score 100

Sustainability

  • Operating margin: 46.7%; rating input score 90; 90th percentile among comparable filings
  • Total-asset coverage ratio: 1.58; rating input score 59; 59th percentile among comparable filings
  • Liabilities to assets ratio: 0; rating input score 34; 34th percentile among comparable filings
  • Officer compensation ratio: 0%; rating input score 56; 56th percentile among comparable filings

Growth

  • Program expense growth: 71.6% per year; rating input score 100; 96th percentile among comparable filings
  • Revenue growth: 32.9% per year; rating input score 100; 94th percentile among comparable filings
  • Asset growth: 70.7% per year; rating input score 100; 97th percentile among comparable filings

Details

  • Where the money goes: 53.2% of revenue deployed · 99.7% of spending went to programs
  • Governance: Filed governance answers
  • Accomplishments: 2 filed program accomplishments · $37K in reported program spending
  • Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 3 people listed
  • Consistency: 7 of 7 current checks pass
  • Schedules: 3 filed schedules
  • Filing history: 4 filing years from 2018 to 2024
  • Contacts: How to reach this organization
  • Money network: Resolved incoming and outgoing counterparties from filed money flows.
  • Related organizations: Filed and resolved organization relationships.
  • Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
  • People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.

Key Signals

Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.

  • Review — Financial Efficiency: Mission deployment rate scored 53/100.
  • Review — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 59/100.
  • Moderate — Sustainability: Liabilities to assets ratio scored 34/100.
  • Review — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 56/100.