National Yang Ming Chiao Tung Univ Alumni Assoc of North California
Nonprofit profile at a glance
- EIN
- 991597787
- IRS 990-EZ coverage
- 2024–2025
- Forms available
- Form 990-EZ 2025
- Location
- San Jose, CA, USA
- Phone
- 5103867971
- Rating
- 82
- Verdict
- STRONG
- Rating confidence
- Moderate
- Sector
- Alumni Associations
Reported finances
- Revenue
- $57,852
- Expenses
- $48,975
- Assets
- $43,082
Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2025. Amounts in USD.
Leadership & pay
7 people listed
Executive titles in this filing
- Chia-Yung Kuo (CEO)
- Shang-Chien Shen (Vice President)
- Yung-Chieh Lo (Vice President)
- Wei Yuan Shih (Vice President)
- Li-Hsin Chen (Vice President)
People named in this filing
- Wei-Hao Huang (CFO)
- Chia-Yung Kuo (CEO)
- Chengwei Yang (Secretary)
Selected names, not a complete roster or a statement of current roles. Open leadership details for the complete filed list.
Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2025. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.
Overview
Mission
National Yang Ming Chiao Tung University Alumni Association of North California's mission is to facilitate connections exchanges, and mutual assistance among alumni of National Yang Ming CHiao Tung University (NYCU) in North California. Its objectives include:1. Organizing seminars, entrepreneurship, academic, and social activities to strengthen alumni relationships and unity2. Providing opportunities for cooperation and feedback between alumni and the alma mater.3. Enhancing alumni development in local culture, economy, society, technology, and other aspects.
What it reported doing in 2025
To represent the alumni of National Yang Ming Chiao Tung University
Operating model
- Revenue model
- Cannot be determined from the filing. The filing does not provide enough consistent revenue detail to tell how this nonprofit funds its work.
- Distribution model
- Direct operator. The filing allocates 100% of reported program-service expenses outside its grant, affiliate-payment, and member-benefit lines. This expense classification does not rule out separately announced grant awards.
The verdict
STRONG - A large share of available resources goes toward mission work and the filed numbers largely add up. Revenue has declined or grown slowly and total assets are small relative to annual expenses; liquid coverage is unknown.
Rating breakdown
- Financial Efficiency: 91
- Transparency & Controls: 82
- Sustainability: 51
- Growth: 20
Detailed rating inputs
Financial Efficiency
- Mission deployment rate: 84.7%; rating input score 85
- Program expense ratio: 100%; rating input score 100
Transparency & Controls
- Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 51st percentile among comparable filings
- Major donor itemization: Limited
Sustainability
- Operating margin: 15.3%; rating input score 67; 67th percentile among comparable filings
- Total-asset coverage ratio: 0.88; rating input score 44; 44th percentile among comparable filings
- Liabilities to assets ratio: Limited
- Officer compensation ratio: 0%; rating input score 56; 56th percentile among comparable filings
Growth
- Program expense growth: Limited
- Revenue growth: -14.9% per year; rating input score 0; 19th percentile among comparable filings
- Asset growth: 23% per year; rating input score 100; 86th percentile among comparable filings
Details
- Where the money goes: 84.7% of revenue deployed · 100% of spending went to programs
- Governance: Filed governance answers
- Accomplishments: 1 filed program accomplishment · $49K in reported program spending
- Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 7 people listed
- Consistency: 6 of 6 current checks pass
- Schedules: 2 filed schedules
- Filing history: 2 filing years from 2024 to 2025
- Contacts: How to reach this organization
- Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
- People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.
Key Signals
Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.
- High — Growth: Revenue growth scored 0/100.
- Moderate — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 44/100.
- Review — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 56/100.