National Womens Studies Association Inc
Nonprofit profile at a glance
- EIN
- 741971364
- IRS 990 coverage
- 2011–2024
- Forms available
- Form 990 2024
- Location
- Baltimore, MD, USA
- Phone
- 7735241807
- Rating
- 77
- Verdict
- SUPPORTED
- Rating confidence
- Moderate
- Sector
- Women's Studies
Reported finances
- Revenue
- $711,390
- Expenses
- $831,369
- Assets
- $819,756
- Liabilities
- $16,221
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Amounts in USD.
Leadership & pay
12 people listed
Executive titles in this filing
- Kristian Contreras (Executive Director)
- Heidi R Lewis (President)
- Stephanie Troutman Robbins (Vice President)
Highest reported compensation
- Kristian Contreras (Executive Director): $120,605 total reported compensation
- Courtney Carroll (Operations Mgr): $68,632 total reported compensation
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.
Overview
Mission
Established in 1977, NWSA has, as one of its primary objectives, promoting and supporting the production and circulation of knowledge about women, gender and Sexuality through teaching, learning, research and service in academia and beyond.
What it reported doing in 2024
NATIONAL CONFERENCE: The annual convening of the NWSA is the signature program of the Association. Our annual conference brings together approximately 1,800 activists, administrators, artists, educators, dreamers, practitioners, and feminist trouble makers with a vested interest in and commitment to promoting and supporting the production and dissemination of knowledge about gender and sexuality through teaching, learning, research and service in academic and other settings. Emerging scholars, such as undergraduate and graduate students, present their original research and engage in feedback from experts in the field. On average, over 900 scholarly papers and 400 panel sessions define the conference program as they explore facets of Women's, Gender, and Sexuality studies in and outside of academia. The conference melds professional development, community, and coalition building for our membership in addition to showcasing the latest contributions in our discipline.Pre-Conferences: Our Annual Pre-Conferences are an initiative that provide tailored and structured professional development for three branches of our membership: Program and Administration (PAD) for our program chairs and directors, Women's Centers Committee (WCC) for our educators anchored in Women's and Gender Equity centers, and our Women of Color Leadership program which is focused on providing support and resources to women of color navigating different areas of the field (administration, faculty, organizations, etc). The PAD Pre-Conference provides administrators with ideas, strategies, and approaches to both strengthen and grow WGSS programs in hard times. These include: supporting diverse leadership, building coalitions across campus and across town, fundraising, battling backlash, making external reviews successful, incorporating service learning requirements, and more. The WCC provides an opportunity for women's center directors, staff and others to gather and share information, ideas, challenges, successes and support. This space serves as one of the coalition building, professional development and alchemy as Women's Centers staff work to address sociopolitical issues that impact their sites of learning, the field as a whole, and our interpersonal lives. The WoCLP is designed to increase the number of women of color students, staff and faculty members within the field of women's studies and women's centers and, consequently, to have impact on the levels of participation and power by women of color in the field of women's studies and women's centers, in NWSA, and in PAD and WCC. On average our attendance for each pre-conference is as follows: PAD (60-80) attendees, WCC (50-60 attendees), and WoCLP (40 attendees).
Operating model
- Revenue model
- Earned-program. 93% of the money available for current operations came from fees and other program revenue.
- Distribution model
- Direct operator. The filing allocates 100% of reported program-service expenses outside its grant, affiliate-payment, and member-benefit lines. This expense classification does not rule out separately announced grant awards.
The verdict
SUPPORTED - A large share of available resources goes toward mission work and the filed numbers largely add up. Fundraising costs are high for each dollar raised and expenses are high relative to revenue.
Rating breakdown
- Financial Efficiency: 70
- Transparency & Controls: 82
- Accountability: 90
- Sustainability: 26
- Growth: 100
Detailed rating inputs
Financial Efficiency
- Mission deployment rate: 81.9%; rating input score 82
- Program expense ratio: 73.4%; rating input score 73
- Fundraising efficiency: $1.04 raised per $1 spent on fundraising; rating input score 3; 3rd percentile among comparable filings
Transparency & Controls
- Consistency checks: 90.9%; rating input score 91; 8th percentile among comparable filings
- Pay-setting controls: Limited
- Foreign activity oversight: Limited
- Grant itemization coverage: Limited
- Major donor itemization: Limited
- Related-party transparency: Limited
Accountability
- Independent voting board: 100%; rating input score 100; 63rd percentile among comparable filings
- Governance controls: 6 of 8 controls in place; rating input score 75
- Conflict-of-interest policy: Pass
- Whistleblower policy: Pass
- Document-retention policy: Pass
- CEO compensation review process: Pass
- Other executive compensation review process: NotApplicable
- Form 990 shared with the board: Pass
- Board meeting minutes documented: Pass
- Audit committee oversight: Missing
- Independent financial-statement audit: Fail
Sustainability
- Operating margin: -16.9%; rating input score 11; 11th percentile among comparable filings
- Total-asset coverage ratio: 0.99; rating input score 42; 42nd percentile among comparable filings
- Liabilities to assets ratio: 0.02; rating input score 63; 63rd percentile among comparable filings
- Officer compensation ratio: 22.8%; rating input score 12; 12th percentile among comparable filings
Growth
- Program expense growth: 2.7% per year; rating input score 100; 30th percentile among comparable filings
- Revenue growth: 0.2% per year; rating input score 100; 15th percentile among comparable filings
- Asset growth: 0.4% per year; rating input score 100; 19th percentile among comparable filings
Details
- Where the money goes: 81.9% of revenue deployed · 73.4% of spending went to programs
- Governance: 10 of 10 board members independent · 6 of 8 filing controls reported
- Programs: 2 filed program accomplishments · $610K in reported program spending
- Leadership: top reported pay $121K · 12 people listed
- Highest-paid contractors: 2 contractors listed · $228K reported
- Consistency: 25 of 26 current checks pass · 1 finding to review
- Schedules: 3 filed schedules
- Filing history: 13 filing years from 2011 to 2024
- Contacts: How to reach this organization
- Money network: 2 filed money-flow records
- Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
- People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.
Key Signals
Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.
- High — Financial Efficiency: Fundraising efficiency scored 3/100.
- High — Sustainability: Operating margin scored 11/100.
- Review — Accountability: Governance controls: Independent financial-statement audit not reported.
- Moderate — Transparency & Controls: Schedule A contributions reconciliation did not reconcile in the filed values.
- Moderate — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 42/100.
- High — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 12/100.