National Vaccine Law Association

Nonprofit profile at a glance

EIN
931340378
IRS 990-EZ coverage
2023–2024
Forms available
Form 990-EZ 2024
Location
Falls Church, VA, USA
Rating
37
Verdict
REVIEW
Rating confidence
Moderate
Sector
Professional Societies, Associations

Reported finances

Revenue
$47,605
Expenses
$14,410
Assets
$9,458
Liabilities
$0

Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Amounts in USD.

Leadership & pay

4 people listed

People named in this filing

  • Denise M Hill (Conference Chair)
  • Michelle Fiscus (Conference Vice Chair)
  • Brian Dean Abramson (Conference Treasurer)

Selected names, not a complete roster or a statement of current roles. Open leadership details for the complete filed list.

Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.

Overview

Mission

The organization holds a national conference at least biannually to bring together experts in different areas of vaccine law for transdisciplinary programs and discussions designed to foster understanding of their various contributions to the field and to public health. It will gather summarize and disseminate timely information to its members regarding developments in the field of vaccine law and develop and disseminate tools to facilitate accurate and informative public communications about vaccine law.

What it reported doing in 2024

The organization held the National Vaccine Law Conference over three days from September 13-15 2023 at the George Washington University Law School. 307 people registered to attend including over 90 speakers with expertise drawn from all areas of vaccine law for activities including panel discussions plenary sessions and roundtable discussions. In 2024 the organization maintained communications and provision of information to 2023 conference attendees and others in the field and undertook preparations for a conference to be held in 2025.

Operating model

Revenue model
Donor-supported. 100% of the money available for current operations came from contributions and gifts.
Distribution model
No current program activity. The filing reports no program spending for the current year.

The verdict

REVIEW - The filed numbers largely add up and revenue comfortably covers expenses. A relatively small share of available resources goes toward mission work and revenue has declined or grown slowly.

Rating breakdown

  • Financial Efficiency: 0
  • Transparency & Controls: 82
  • Sustainability: 70
  • Growth: 20

Detailed rating inputs

Financial Efficiency

  • Mission deployment rate: 0%; rating input score 0
  • Program expense ratio: Limited

Transparency & Controls

  • Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 52nd percentile among comparable filings
  • Major donor itemization: Limited

Sustainability

  • Operating margin: 69.7%; rating input score 95; 95th percentile among comparable filings
  • Total-asset coverage ratio: 0.66; rating input score 36; 36th percentile among comparable filings
  • Liabilities to assets ratio: 0; rating input score 68; 68th percentile among comparable filings
  • Officer compensation ratio: 0%; rating input score 56; 56th percentile among comparable filings

Growth

  • Program expense growth: Limited
  • Revenue growth: -103.7% per year; rating input score 0; 2nd percentile among comparable filings
  • Asset growth: 200% per year; rating input score 100; 100th percentile among comparable filings

Details

  • Where the money goes: 0% of revenue deployed
  • Governance: Filed governance answers
  • Accomplishments: 3 filed program accomplishments
  • Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 4 people listed
  • Consistency: 6 of 6 current checks pass
  • Schedules: 2 filed schedules
  • Filing history: 2 filing years from 2023 to 2024
  • Contacts: How to reach this organization
  • Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
  • People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.

Key Signals

Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.

  • High — Financial Efficiency: Mission deployment rate scored 0/100.
  • High — Growth: Revenue growth scored 0/100.
  • Moderate — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 36/100.
  • Review — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 56/100.