National Upholstery Association

Nonprofit profile at a glance

EIN
834064048
IRS 990-EZ coverage
2020–2025
Forms available
Form 990-EZ 2025
Location
Virginia Beach, VA, USA
Phone
6157150200
Rating confidence
Limited
Sector
Business and Industry

Official website

Reported finances

Revenue
$50,145
Expenses
$47,044
Assets
$94,087
Liabilities
$0

Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2025. Amounts in USD.

Leadership & pay

9 people listed

Executive titles in this filing

  • GRACE REFF (VICE PRESIDENT)
  • SAMANTHA KUCZYNSKI (PRESIDENT)

People named in this filing

  • ELLA HALL (DIRECTOR)
  • RON TREVAROW (DIRECTOR)
  • MELISSA BAGWELL (DIRECTOR)

Selected names, not a complete roster or a statement of current roles. Open leadership details for the complete filed list.

Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2025. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.

Overview

Mission

The association was formed to further the advancement of the field of upholstery through continuing education, networking opportunities, and business resources.

What it reported doing in 2025

The association's website will provide to members: a database of upholstery educators and vendors; the ability to advertise for employment opportunities; a listing in both the public directory and membership directory with links to the members website or social media account if desired. The association's website will provide the public with greater understanding of the upholstery trade by offering: access to a membership directory, (searchable by city, state or type of upholstery), topical articles about the upholstery industry (such as when to upholster, how to find quality furniture, and other topics applicable to the public education of the upholstery industry). This website went live in 2019 and will continue to be in use, while the association is active. Volunteer members are and will help with maintaining the website, posting information provided by committees and the board of directors.

Operating model

Revenue model
Membership-supported. 98% of the money available for current operations came from membership dues.
Distribution model
Cannot be determined from the filing. The filing does not provide enough consistent spending detail to tell whether the nonprofit works directly or through others.

The verdict

- The available evidence is not sufficient to produce an overall rating for this filing. This is not a warning sign.

Rating breakdown

  • Financial Efficiency: NotEnoughData
  • Transparency & Controls: 82
  • Sustainability: 59
  • Growth: 60

Detailed rating inputs

Financial Efficiency

  • Mission deployment rate: Limited
  • Program expense ratio: Limited

Transparency & Controls

  • Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 51st percentile among comparable filings
  • Major donor itemization: Limited

Sustainability

  • Operating margin: 6.2%; rating input score 55; 55th percentile among comparable filings
  • Total-asset coverage ratio: 2; rating input score 65; 65th percentile among comparable filings
  • Liabilities to assets ratio: 0; rating input score 66; 66th percentile among comparable filings
  • Officer compensation ratio: 0%; rating input score 56; 56th percentile among comparable filings

Growth

  • Program expense growth: Limited
  • Revenue growth: 18.2% per year; rating input score 100; 88th percentile among comparable filings
  • Asset growth: 16.2% per year; rating input score 100; 80th percentile among comparable filings

Details

  • Where the money goes: Financial trends and filed revenue, expense, asset, and liability detail
  • Governance: Filed governance answers
  • Accomplishments: 3 filed program accomplishments
  • Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 9 people listed
  • Consistency: 7 of 7 current checks pass
  • Schedules: 1 filed schedules
  • Filing history: 6 filing years from 2020 to 2025
  • Contacts: How to reach this organization
  • Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
  • People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.

Key Signals

Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.

  • Review — Sustainability: Operating margin scored 55/100.
  • Review — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 56/100.