National Student Nurses' Associationinc
Nonprofit profile at a glance
- EIN
- 136081991
- IRS 990 coverage
- 2019–2024
- Forms available
- Form 990 2024
- Location
- Queens Village, NY, USA
- Phone
- 7182100705
- Rating confidence
- Limited
Reported finances
- Revenue
- $2,986,535
- Expenses
- $3,229,446
- Assets
- $2,293,152
- Liabilities
- $2,484,546
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Amounts in USD.
Leadership & pay
24 people listed
Executive titles in this filing
- ETHAN R SLOCUM (PRESIDENT (FROM 4/24))
- KAYLA HONEYSETT (VICE PRESIDENT (THRU 4/24))
- LAUREN LODICO (PRESIDENT (THRU 4/24))
- MATTHEW ZENDER (VICE PRESIDENT (FROM 4/24))
- KENYA WILLIAMS (CEO)
Highest reported compensation
- KENYA WILLIAMS (CEO): $243,602 total reported compensation
- DEV PERSAUD (CFO): $144,761 total reported compensation
- JASMINE MELENDEZ (FNSNA GRANTS MANAGER): $125,636 total reported compensation
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.
Overview
Mission
The organization's mission is to bring together and mentor students preparing for initial licensure as registered nurses, as well as those enrolled in baccalaureate completion programs; convey the standards and ethics of the nursing profession; promote development of the skills that students will need as responsible and accountable members of the nursing profession; advocate for high quality, evidence-based, affordable and accessible health care; advocate for and contribute to advances in nursing education; develop nursing students who are prepared to lead the profession in the future.
What it reported doing in 2024
Publications - nsna promotes the positive image of nursing students, nsna uses its publication and digital media to promote professionalism through programs; brochures; role modeling; mentoring; btn projects; image of nursing project awards; nsna's guidelines for planning image of nursing activities to differentiate between negative and positive image of nursing; articles on educational programs at midyear and convention currently relevant to a variety of practice settings; program opportunities highlighting diverse viewpoints reflecting all populations; issues surrounding delegation to unlicensed assistive personnel; technology in nursing education and practice; economics of healthcare; self-care and prevention of illness; case studies re: interdisciplinary teams; collaboration and cooperation between medicine and nursing; service learning and shared governance for both students and faculty; promote ethics: nsna code of professional conduct; code of academic and clinical conduct; ana code of ethics.
Operating model
- Revenue model
- Other-operating. 98% of the money available for current operations came from other operating revenue.
- Distribution model
- Cannot be determined from the filing. The filing does not provide enough consistent spending detail to tell whether the nonprofit works directly or through others.
The verdict
- The available evidence is not sufficient to produce an overall rating for this filing. This is not a warning sign.
Rating breakdown
- Financial Efficiency: NotEnoughData
- Transparency & Controls: 78
- Accountability: 91
- Sustainability: 18
- Growth: 40
Detailed rating inputs
Financial Efficiency
- Mission deployment rate: Limited
- Program expense ratio: Limited
- Fundraising efficiency: Limited
Transparency & Controls
- Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 63rd percentile among comparable filings
- Pay-setting controls: 2 of 6 controls in place; rating input score 33
- Compensation committee: Missing
- Independent consultant: Missing
- Other Form 990s reviewed: Missing
- Written employment contract: Missing
- Compensation survey or study: Pass
- Board or committee approval: Pass
- Foreign activity oversight: Limited
- Grant itemization coverage: Limited
- Major donor itemization: Limited
- Related-party transparency: Yes; rating input score 100
Accountability
- Independent voting board: 100%; rating input score 100; 63rd percentile among comparable filings
- Governance controls: 7 of 9 controls in place; rating input score 78
- Conflict-of-interest policy: Pass
- Whistleblower policy: Pass
- Document-retention policy: Pass
- CEO compensation review process: Pass
- Other executive compensation review process: Fail
- Form 990 shared with the board: Fail
- Board meeting minutes documented: Pass
- Audit committee oversight: Pass
- Independent financial-statement audit: Pass
Sustainability
- Operating margin: -8.1%; rating input score 15; 15th percentile among comparable filings
- Total-asset coverage ratio: 0.71; rating input score 26; 26th percentile among comparable filings
- Liabilities to assets ratio: 1.08; rating input score 4; 4th percentile among comparable filings
- Officer compensation ratio: 12.5%; rating input score 24; 24th percentile among comparable filings
Growth
- Program expense growth: Limited
- Revenue growth: 0.5% per year; rating input score 100; 13th percentile among comparable filings
- Asset growth: -7.1% per year; rating input score 0; 3rd percentile among comparable filings
Details
- Where the money goes: Financial trends and filed revenue, expense, asset, and liability detail
- Governance: 9 of 9 board members independent · 7 of 9 filing controls reported
- Programs: 4 filed program accomplishments
- Leadership: top reported pay $244K · 24 people listed · 2 of 6 pay-setting controls reported
- Consistency: 14 of 14 current checks pass
- Schedules: 5 filed schedules · includes executive pay and related organizations
- Filing history: 6 filing years from 2019 to 2024
- Contacts: How to reach this organization
- Money network: 2 filed money-flow records
- Related organizations: 1 filed related-organization link
- Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
- People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.
- Staff and benefit plans: Retirement and health plans the organization files with the Department of Labor, and the people in them.
Key Signals
Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.
- High — Sustainability: Operating margin scored 15/100.
- Review — Accountability: Governance controls: 2 of 9 not reported.
- High — Growth: Asset growth scored 0/100.
- High — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 26/100.
- High — Sustainability: Liabilities to assets ratio scored 4/100.
- High — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 24/100.