National Rural Water Association

Nonprofit profile at a glance

EIN
731006395
IRS 990 coverage
2019–2024
Official website data refreshed
Sep 2026
Forms available
Form 990 2024
Location
Duncan, OK, United States
Phone
580.252.0629
Rating
86
Verdict
STRONG
Rating confidence
Moderate

Official website

Reported finances

Revenue
$81,786,877
Expenses
$74,539,636
Assets
$89,126,630
Liabilities
$19,649,350

Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Amounts in USD.

Leadership & pay

56 people listed

Executive titles in this filing

  • PHILLIP COMBS (PRESIDENT)
  • CHRIS KENYON (SR. VICE PRESIDENT)
  • DAVID PETERSON (VICE PRESIDENT)
  • JOHN O'CONNELL (IMMEDIATE PAST PRESIDENT)
  • JOHN CHOATE (EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR)
  • TOM SPEER (EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR)

Highest reported compensation

  • MATTHEW HOLMES (CEO): $428,889 total reported compensation
  • WILLIAM SIMPSON (LEGISLATIVE DIRECTOR): $373,693 total reported compensation
  • CHARLES STEPHENS (SR. EXECUTIVE POLICY DIREC): $324,035 total reported compensation

Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.

Overview

Mission

The National Rural Water Association is a non-profit organization dedicated to training, supporting, and promoting the water and wastewater professionals that serve small and rural communities across the country. NRWA programs and staff exclusively focus on helping rural and small-town America, where _**1 in 5 Americans live and work.**_ In addition, State Rural Water Associations have built up substantial expertise in emergency response, operator certification and training, cybersecurity, and other areas that **_directly benefit 220,035,060 Americans_** , including many residents in urban areas. > Our mission is to strengthen State Associations. Safe drinking water and clean wastewater treatment are vital to the health and safety of Americans. With the support of our State Associations, NRWA strives to protect the quality of life in America, while supporting the grassroots efforts...

What it reported doing in 2024

Nrwa provides training and technical assistance through 49 affiliated state rural water associations, that currently have over 31,000 utility system members. Rural water training and technical assistance covers every aspect of operating, managing, and financing water and wastewater utilities.

Operating model

Revenue model
Grant-funded. 93% of the money available for current operations came from government grants.
Distribution model
Grant intermediary. The nonprofit sent 82% of its reported program spending out as grants.

The verdict

STRONG - A large share of available resources goes toward mission work and the filed numbers largely add up. Some filing-based governance responses are negative or unanswered and total assets are small relative to annual expenses; liquid coverage is unknown.

Rating breakdown

  • Financial Efficiency: 86
  • Transparency & Controls: 82
  • Accountability: 95
  • Sustainability: 59
  • Growth: 100

Detailed rating inputs

Financial Efficiency

  • Mission deployment rate: 95.8%; rating input score 96
  • Program expense ratio: 99.1%; rating input score 99
  • Fundraising efficiency: Limited

Transparency & Controls

  • Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 68th percentile among comparable filings
  • Pay-setting controls: 3 of 6 controls in place; rating input score 50
    • Compensation committee: Pass
    • Independent consultant: Missing
    • Other Form 990s reviewed: Missing
    • Written employment contract: Missing
    • Compensation survey or study: Pass
    • Board or committee approval: Pass
  • Foreign activity oversight: Limited
  • Grant itemization coverage: 100%; rating input score 100; 77th percentile among comparable filings
  • Major donor itemization: Limited
  • Related-party transparency: Limited

Accountability

  • Independent voting board: 100%; rating input score 100; 77th percentile among comparable filings
  • Governance controls: 8 of 9 controls in place; rating input score 89
    • Conflict-of-interest policy: Pass
    • Whistleblower policy: Pass
    • Document-retention policy: Pass
    • CEO compensation review process: Pass
    • Other executive compensation review process: Fail
    • Form 990 shared with the board: Pass
    • Board meeting minutes documented: Pass
    • Audit committee oversight: Pass
    • Independent financial-statement audit: Pass

Sustainability

  • Operating margin: 8.9%; rating input score 70; 70th percentile among comparable filings
  • Total-asset coverage ratio: 1.2; rating input score 46; 46th percentile among comparable filings
  • Liabilities to assets ratio: 0.22; rating input score 66; 66th percentile among comparable filings
  • Officer compensation ratio: 3%; rating input score 39; 39th percentile among comparable filings

Growth

  • Program expense growth: 10.9% per year; rating input score 100; 78th percentile among comparable filings
  • Revenue growth: 9.6% per year; rating input score 100; 75th percentile among comparable filings
  • Asset growth: 8.5% per year; rating input score 100; 62nd percentile among comparable filings

Details

  • What they do: 2 programs and campaigns described on the official site · 1 operating location identified
  • Where the money goes: 95.8% of revenue deployed · 99.1% of spending went to programs
  • Governance: 49 of 49 board members independent · 8 of 9 filing controls reported
  • Programs: 1 filed program accomplishment · $73.9M in reported program spending
  • Leadership: top reported pay $429K · 56 people listed · 3 of 6 pay-setting controls reported
  • Consistency: 35 of 35 current checks pass
  • Schedules: 6 filed schedules · includes grants and executive pay
  • Filing history: 5 filing years from 2019 to 2024
  • Contacts: How to reach this organization
  • Money network: 56 filed money-flow records
  • Related organizations: 51 filed related-organization links
  • Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
  • People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.
  • Staff and benefit plans: Retirement and health plans the organization files with the Department of Labor, and the people in them.

Key Signals

Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.

  • Review — Accountability: Governance controls: Other executive compensation review process not reported.
  • Moderate — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 46/100.
  • Moderate — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 39/100.