National Quantum Literacy Network Corpor

Nonprofit profile at a glance

EIN
873518295
IRS 990-EZ coverage
2025–2025
Forms available
Form 990 2024, Form 990-EZ 2025, Form 990-N 2023
Location
Glen Burnie, MD, USA
Rating
63
Verdict
SUPPORTED
Rating confidence
Moderate
Sector
Educational Services and Schools - Other

Reported finances

Revenue
$86,794
Expenses
$120,190
Assets
$195,353
Liabilities
$60,472

Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2025. Amounts in USD.

Leadership & pay

6 people listed

Executive titles in this filing

  • TIM AKERS (President & CEO)

People named in this filing

  • LILY MILLINER (Chairman)
  • SURESH NAIR (Treasurer)
  • RANDI HUNLEY (Secretary)

Selected names, not a complete roster or a statement of current roles. Open leadership details for the complete filed list.

Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2025. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.

Overview

Mission

The National Quantum Literacy Network, a nonprofit social enterprise based in the Washington, DC region, is committed to advancing quantum literacy education and workforce readiness. Representing a coalition of industry leaders, government agencies, academic institutions, and nonprofits, NQLN is at the forefront of addressing the nations quantum and artificial intelligence workforce needs. By engaging Historically Black Colleges and Universities HBCUs, Hispanic-Serving Institutions HSIs, Tribal Colleges and Universities TCUs, small businesses, veterans, and first-generation learners, NQLN works to ensure these transformative technologies are accessible to all.

What it reported doing in 2025

E-Learning: Providing a state-of-the-art online learning environment designed to make quantum concepts accessible and engaging. This platform offers modules tailored for K-16 learners, career changers, and professionals seeking to upskill.

Operating model

Revenue model
Cannot be determined from the filing. The filing does not provide enough consistent revenue detail to tell how this nonprofit funds its work.
Distribution model
Direct operator. The filing allocates 100% of reported program-service expenses outside its grant, affiliate-payment, and member-benefit lines. This expense classification does not rule out separately announced grant awards.

The verdict

SUPPORTED - A large share of available resources goes toward mission work and the filed numbers largely add up. A relatively small share of total spending goes to programs and revenue has declined or grown slowly.

Rating breakdown

  • Financial Efficiency: 63
  • Transparency & Controls: 74
  • Sustainability: 32
  • Growth: 0

Detailed rating inputs

Financial Efficiency

  • Mission deployment rate: 69.9%; rating input score 70
  • Program expense ratio: 50.5%; rating input score 51

Transparency & Controls

  • Consistency checks: 90%; rating input score 90; 2nd percentile among comparable filings
  • Major donor itemization: Limited

Sustainability

  • Operating margin: -38.5%; rating input score 15; 15th percentile among comparable filings
  • Total-asset coverage ratio: 1.63; rating input score 60; 60th percentile among comparable filings
  • Liabilities to assets ratio: 0.31; rating input score 10; 10th percentile among comparable filings
  • Officer compensation ratio: 0%; rating input score 56; 56th percentile among comparable filings

Growth

  • Program expense growth: Limited
  • Revenue growth: -146.7% per year; rating input score 0; 1st percentile among comparable filings
  • Asset growth: -15.7% per year; rating input score 0; 13th percentile among comparable filings

Details

  • Where the money goes: 69.9% of revenue deployed · 50.5% of spending went to programs
  • Governance: Filed governance answers
  • Accomplishments: 1 filed program accomplishment · $61K in reported program spending
  • Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 6 people listed
  • Consistency: 7 of 7 current checks pass
  • Schedules: 2 filed schedules
  • Contacts: How to reach this organization
  • Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
  • People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.

Key Signals

Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.

  • Review — Financial Efficiency: Program expense ratio scored 51/100.
  • High — Growth: Revenue growth scored 0/100.
  • High — Sustainability: Operating margin scored 15/100.
  • High — Growth: Asset growth scored 0/100.
  • High — Sustainability: Liabilities to assets ratio scored 10/100.
  • Review — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 56/100.