National Pygmy Goat Association

Nonprofit profile at a glance

EIN
042730363
IRS 990-EZ coverage
2014–2025
Forms available
Form 990-EZ 2025
Location
West Union, SC, USA
Phone
6614485141
Rating confidence
Limited

Official website

Reported finances

Revenue
$129,669
Expenses
$122,838
Assets
$118,985
Liabilities
$17,526

Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2025. Amounts in USD.

Leadership & pay

12 people listed

Executive titles in this filing

  • DARREN WATKINS (PRESIDENT)
  • PENNI ROGERS (VICE PRESIDENT)

People named in this filing

  • DARREN WATKINS (PRESIDENT)
  • SUSAN SEILER (TREASURER)
  • PENNI ROGERS (VICE PRESIDENT)

Selected names, not a complete roster or a statement of current roles. Open leadership details for the complete filed list.

Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2025. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.

Overview

Mission

Mission: to support the pygmy goat in the united states by collecting and disseminating information, protecting the breed standard, and recording their lineage through our registry.objectives: facilitate communication and cooperation among breeders and researchers; encourage the breeding and registering of characteristic pygmy goats; establish regional affiliate clubs; gather and disseminate practical and theoretical knowledge of the pygmy goat; promote and popularize the breed by exposure and through publications; and facilitate the registration of certified pygmy goat seed stock and their offspring.

What it reported doing in 2025

Merchandise & book sales - related publications are sold at shows and by mail order. Related costs are the purchase of inventory and postage for mail order items.

Operating model

Revenue model
Earned-program. 70% of the money available for current operations came from fees and other program revenue.
Distribution model
Cannot be determined from the filing. The filing does not provide enough consistent spending detail to tell whether the nonprofit works directly or through others.

The verdict

- The available evidence is not sufficient to produce an overall rating for this filing. This is not a warning sign.

Rating breakdown

  • Financial Efficiency: NotEnoughData
  • Transparency & Controls: 82
  • Sustainability: 48
  • Growth: 20

Detailed rating inputs

Financial Efficiency

  • Mission deployment rate: Limited
  • Program expense ratio: Limited

Transparency & Controls

  • Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 52nd percentile among comparable filings
  • Major donor itemization: Limited

Sustainability

  • Operating margin: 5.3%; rating input score 45; 45th percentile among comparable filings
  • Total-asset coverage ratio: 0.97; rating input score 58; 58th percentile among comparable filings
  • Liabilities to assets ratio: 0.15; rating input score 18; 18th percentile among comparable filings
  • Officer compensation ratio: 0%; rating input score 63; 63rd percentile among comparable filings

Growth

  • Program expense growth: Limited
  • Revenue growth: -0.3% per year; rating input score 0; 18th percentile among comparable filings
  • Asset growth: 1.8% per year; rating input score 100; 32nd percentile among comparable filings

Details

  • Where the money goes: Financial trends and filed revenue, expense, asset, and liability detail
  • Governance: Filed governance answers
  • Accomplishments: 3 filed program accomplishments
  • Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 12 people listed
  • Consistency: 7 of 7 current checks pass
  • Schedules: 1 filed schedules
  • Filing history: 11 filing years from 2014 to 2025
  • Contacts: How to reach this organization
  • Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
  • People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.

Key Signals

Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.

  • High — Growth: Revenue growth scored 0/100.
  • Moderate — Sustainability: Operating margin scored 45/100.
  • Review — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 58/100.
  • High — Sustainability: Liabilities to assets ratio scored 18/100.