National Phlebotomy Provider Network
Legal name: National Phlebotomy Pro Network
Nonprofit profile at a glance
- EIN
- 473655123
- IRS 990 coverage
- 2017–2022
- Official website data refreshed
- Sep 2026
- Forms available
- Form 990 2022, Form 990-N 2016
- Location
- Las Vegas, NV, US
- Phone
- (888) 778-7403
- Rating
- 61
- Verdict
- SUPPORTED
- Rating confidence
- Moderate
- Sector
- Chambers of Commerce & Business Leagues
Reported finances
- Revenue
- $1,207,017
- Expenses
- $1,174,369
- Assets
- $286,559
- Liabilities
- $58,812
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2022. Amounts in USD.
Leadership & pay
1 person listed
Executive titles in this filing
- NATHAN CRON (PRESIDENT)
Highest reported compensation
- NATHAN CRON (PRESIDENT): $78,000 total reported compensation
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2022. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.
Overview
Mission
Our mission is to make diagnostic testing more accessible through expert mobile phlebotomy services.
What it reported doing in 2022
See additional data
Operating model
- Revenue model
- Mixed. Its operating money came from several sources; no one source provided a clear majority.
- Distribution model
- Cannot be determined from the filing. The filing does not provide enough consistent spending detail to tell whether the nonprofit works directly or through others.
The verdict
SUPPORTED - A large share of available resources goes toward mission work and the filed numbers largely add up. A relatively small share of voting board members are independent and some filing-based governance responses are negative or unanswered.
Rating breakdown
- Financial Efficiency: 70
- Transparency & Controls: 83
- Accountability: 5
- Sustainability: 34
- Growth: 100
Detailed rating inputs
Financial Efficiency
- Mission deployment rate: 78.5%; rating input score 78
- Program expense ratio: 80.7%; rating input score 81
- Fundraising efficiency: Limited
Transparency & Controls
- Consistency checks: 91.7%; rating input score 92; 11th percentile among comparable filings
- Pay-setting controls: Limited
- Foreign activity oversight: Limited
- Grant itemization coverage: Limited
- Major donor itemization: Limited
- Related-party transparency: Limited
Accountability
- Independent voting board: 0%; rating input score 0; 4th percentile among comparable filings
- Governance controls: 1 of 8 controls in place; rating input score 12
- Conflict-of-interest policy: Fail
- Whistleblower policy: Fail
- Document-retention policy: Fail
- CEO compensation review process: Pass
- Other executive compensation review process: NotApplicable
- Form 990 shared with the board: Fail
- Board meeting minutes documented: Fail
- Audit committee oversight: Missing
- Independent financial-statement audit: Fail
Sustainability
- Operating margin: 2.7%; rating input score 45; 45th percentile among comparable filings
- Total-asset coverage ratio: 0.24; rating input score 10; 10th percentile among comparable filings
- Liabilities to assets ratio: 0.21; rating input score 33; 33rd percentile among comparable filings
- Officer compensation ratio: 6.6%; rating input score 49; 49th percentile among comparable filings
Growth
- Program expense growth: 13.9% per year; rating input score 100; 74th percentile among comparable filings
- Revenue growth: 13.3% per year; rating input score 100; 75th percentile among comparable filings
- Asset growth: 9.4% per year; rating input score 100; 56th percentile among comparable filings
Details
- What they do: 3 programs and campaigns described on the official site · 1 operating location identified
- Where the money goes: 78.5% of revenue deployed · 80.7% of spending went to programs
- Governance: 0 of 2 board members independent · 1 of 8 filing controls reported
- Programs: 1 filed program accomplishment · $947K in reported program spending
- Leadership: top reported pay $78K · 1 people listed
- Consistency: 20 of 22 current checks pass · 2 findings to review
- Schedules: 2 filed schedules
- Filing history: 6 filing years from 2017 to 2022
- Contacts: How to reach this organization
- Money network: 1 filed money-flow record
- Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
- People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.
Key Signals
Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.
Grant-readiness screening is separate from the live rating, not a measure of program quality. Review the source records before making a grant decision.
- High — Accountability: Independent voting board scored 0/100.
- High — Accountability: Governance controls: 6 of 7 not reported.
- Moderate — Transparency & Controls: Functional expense sum did not reconcile in the filed values.
- Moderate — Transparency & Controls: Part IX PayrollTaxes column sum did not reconcile in the filed values.
- High — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 10/100.
- Moderate — Sustainability: Operating margin scored 45/100.
- Moderate — Sustainability: Liabilities to assets ratio scored 33/100.
- Moderate — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 49/100.
- High — Grant Readiness: Automatic revocation: this organization had its federal tax-exempt status automatically revoked.