National Perinatal Information Center
Nonprofit profile at a glance
- EIN
- 050415082
- IRS 990 coverage
- 2010–2024
- Forms available
- Form 990 2024
- Location
- Warwick, RI, USA
- Phone
- 4019326299
- Rating
- 67
- Verdict
- SUPPORTED
- Rating confidence
- Moderate
Reported finances
- Revenue
- $1,640,874
- Expenses
- $1,921,618
- Assets
- $826,882
- Liabilities
- $696,013
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Amounts in USD.
Leadership & pay
14 people listed
Highest reported compensation
- ELIZABETH ROCHIN PRESIDENT (LEASED EMPLO): $271,746 total reported compensation
- WENDY GUIDA VP OPERATIONS (LEASED EMPLO): $182,015 total reported compensation
- JOHN ROACH SERVICE PROGRAMMER (LEASED EMPLO): $147,359 total reported compensation
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.
Overview
Mission
The national perinatal information center (npic) is dedicated to the improvement of perinatal health through comparative data analysis, program evaluation, health services research and professional continuing education.
What it reported doing in 2024
The national perinatal information center (npic) is dedicated to the improvement of perinatal health through comparative data analysis, program evaluation, health services research, and professional continuing education. Npic is one of the leading perinatal and neonatal data analytics and outcome databases in the united states. For over 35 years, npic has worked with hospitals, patient safety organizations, insurers, and researchers to collect and interpret the data that drives better outcomes for mothers and newborns. As a data leader in the maternal and newborn space, npic continues to provide best-in-class outcomes and benchmark reporting for its member hospitals. Early on, npic became nationally recognized for its unique expertise in the organization of perinatal care and contributions to the regionalization of perinatal care. This early work served as the foundation by which npic would broaden its reach and impact over the next three decades. Through its membership, npic provides benchmarking and data analysis for over 650,000 maternal and newborn discharges per year, representing approximately 10% of the nation's birth volume and making it one of the largest perinatal and neonatal databases in the country. For over 20 years, npic has been leading efforts in linked mother/baby data, which provides a unique and valuable lens into newborn outcomes based on maternal health and comorbidities. In addition, npic provides data analytics, analysis, and reporting for a variety of key organizations that utilize the npic database for research and health analysis. In 2021, npic was recognized by the first annual white house maternal health day of action for its work on stratifying outcomes by ethnicity, providing hospitals, clinicians, and communities the data needed for sustainable efforts related to health and birth equity. Npic partners with like-minded organizations and companies that seek to improve the health outcomes of mothers, birthing people, and newborns through data analysis, maternal and neonatal health resources, and frontline staff engagement. Through its expertise in maternal and neonatal health, npic contracts with hospitals, healthcare entities, and other organizations to serve as a consultant and collaborator for state and regional improvement projects. Npic supports national and local maternal and neonatal quality improvement efforts through their engagement with the alliance for the innovation on maternal health (aim) and the perinatal neonatal quality collaborative of Rhode Island (pnqcri).
Operating model
- Revenue model
- Earned-program. 100% of the money available for current operations came from fees and other program revenue.
- Distribution model
- Direct operator. The filing allocates 100% of reported program-service expenses outside its grant, affiliate-payment, and member-benefit lines. This expense classification does not rule out separately announced grant awards.
The verdict
SUPPORTED - A large share of available resources goes toward mission work and the filed numbers largely add up. Expenses are high relative to revenue and program spending has declined or grown slowly.
Rating breakdown
- Financial Efficiency: 65
- Transparency & Controls: 66
- Accountability: 91
- Sustainability: 12
- Growth: 40
Detailed rating inputs
Financial Efficiency
- Mission deployment rate: 77.6%; rating input score 78
- Program expense ratio: 66.3%; rating input score 66
- Fundraising efficiency: Limited
Transparency & Controls
- Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 63rd percentile among comparable filings
- Pay-setting controls: 1 of 6 controls in place; rating input score 17
- Compensation committee: Missing
- Independent consultant: Missing
- Other Form 990s reviewed: Missing
- Written employment contract: Missing
- Compensation survey or study: Missing
- Board or committee approval: Pass
- Foreign activity oversight: Limited
- Grant itemization coverage: Limited
- Major donor itemization: Limited
- Related-party transparency: Limited
Accountability
- Independent voting board: 100%; rating input score 100; 63rd percentile among comparable filings
- Governance controls: 7 of 9 controls in place; rating input score 78
- Conflict-of-interest policy: Pass
- Whistleblower policy: Pass
- Document-retention policy: Pass
- CEO compensation review process: Pass
- Other executive compensation review process: Pass
- Form 990 shared with the board: Pass
- Board meeting minutes documented: Pass
- Audit committee oversight: Missing
- Independent financial-statement audit: Fail
Sustainability
- Operating margin: -17.1%; rating input score 11; 11th percentile among comparable filings
- Total-asset coverage ratio: 0.43; rating input score 20; 20th percentile among comparable filings
- Liabilities to assets ratio: 0.84; rating input score 8; 8th percentile among comparable filings
- Officer compensation ratio: 38.5%; rating input score 4; 4th percentile among comparable filings
Growth
- Program expense growth: -0.2% per year; rating input score 0; 17th percentile among comparable filings
- Revenue growth: 0.3% per year; rating input score 100; 16th percentile among comparable filings
- Asset growth: -0.3% per year; rating input score 0; 17th percentile among comparable filings
Details
- Where the money goes: 77.6% of revenue deployed · 66.3% of spending went to programs
- Governance: 10 of 10 board members independent · 7 of 9 filing controls reported
- Programs: 1 filed program accomplishment · $1.3M in reported program spending
- Leadership: top reported pay $272K · 14 people listed · 1 of 6 pay-setting controls reported
- Consistency: 22 of 22 current checks pass
- Schedules: 4 filed schedules · includes executive pay
- Filing history: 14 filing years from 2010 to 2024
- Contacts: How to reach this organization
- Money network: 4 filed money-flow records
- Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
- People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.
Key Signals
Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.
- High — Sustainability: Operating margin scored 11/100.
- High — Growth: Program expense growth scored 0/100.
- High — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 20/100.
- Review — Accountability: Governance controls: Independent financial-statement audit not reported.
- High — Growth: Asset growth scored 0/100.
- High — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 4/100.
- High — Sustainability: Liabilities to assets ratio scored 8/100.