National Pediatric Cancer Foundation Inc

Nonprofit profile at a glance

EIN
593097333
IRS 990 coverage
2013–2024
Forms available
Form 990 2024
Location
Tampa, FL, USA
Phone
8132690955
Rating
86
Verdict
STRONG
Rating confidence
Moderate
Sector
Health Treatment Facilities, Primarily Outpatient

Official website

Reported finances

Revenue
$4,449,969
Expenses
$5,723,050
Assets
$6,202,847
Liabilities
$1,059,559

Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Amounts in USD.

Leadership & pay

26 people listed

Executive titles in this filing

  • DAVID FRAZER (CEO)

Highest reported compensation

  • DAVID FRAZER (CEO): $210,377 total reported compensation
  • ROBERT MARTIN (CFO THRU OCTOBER 2024): $132,178 total reported compensation
  • DAWN ZACHMAN (COO): $119,939 total reported compensation

Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.

Overview

Mission

National pediatric cancer foundation (npcf) is a nonprofit organization dedicated to funding research to eliminate childhood cancer. Our focus is to fund research to find less toxic, more targeted therapies by partnering with leading hospitals nationwide.

What it reported doing in 2024

The national pediatric cancer foundation funds pediatric cancer research with the goal of leading to the treatment and elimination of pediatric cancer worldwide.we accomplish our mission through our research initiative, the sunshine project, an innovative collaboration of 40 hospitals nationwide. This collaborative research model is unique and effective in accelerating the development of new treatments against childhood cancer.see schedule o for further program service accomplishments.in developing this collaboration, the foundation has brought together some of the country's leading investigators and institutions to drive the process of finding a cure. Investigators are performing three vital phases of research simultaneously: basic science, translational research and clinical trials. These major research components not only allow doctors to identify new agents in fighting cancer, but also help researchers to understand the cancer cells response to the drug. The national pediatric cancer foundation is making great strides in its mission to find a cure for childhood cancer.current initiatives of the sunshine project are as follows: sarcoma trials (osteosarcoma, rhabdomyosarcoma, ewing sarcoma, non-rhabdomyosarcoma); brain cancer trials (medulloblastoma, high-grade glioma); solid state tumors1. Evolutionary inspired therapy for newly diagnosed, metastatic, fusion positive rhabdomyosarcoma - metastatic, fusion positive rhabdomyosarcoma (rms) have a poor outcome which is worsened with additional risk factors commonly called the oberlin criteria. Patients that meet all 4 oberlin criteria have an event free survival (efs) of less than 20% at 2 years. All therapeutic arms on this study are designed to meet the same primary aim of improving the 3-year event free survival from 6% to 35% for these patients. 2. Blood based biomarkers for minimal residual disease detection in pediatric sarcomas - the purpose of this study is to see if detecting cell-free plasma tumor dna (ptdna) and circulating tumor cells (ctc) can predict recurrence of disease in patients who are in radiographic remission 2-3 weeks after treatment. Plasma tumor dna (ptdna) is free floating dna from the tumor found in the blood stream and circulating tumor cells.3. A multi-institution study of tgfb imprinted, ex vivo expanded universal donor nk cell infusions as adoptive immunotherapy in combination with gemcitabine and docetaxel in patients with relapsed or refractory pediatric bone and soft tissue sarcomas: the tinks trial - the purpose of this trial is to determine the safety of the addition of adoptive transfer of universal donor, tgfb imprinted (tgfbi), expanded nk cells to gemcitabine/docetaxel (gem/dox) for treatment of relapsed and refractory sarcomas and to determine the 6 month progression free survival achieved with this treatment.4. Feasibility of generating novel translational and therapeutic strategies based on a multicenter, pediatric and aya evolutionary tumor board (pedsetb) - pediatric evolutionary tumor board (pedsetb) is a multidisciplinary forum to approach an individual patient's cancer and propose additional ideas for care. The pedsetb will gather disciplines not often engaged in cancer work and use insights from evolution to optimally model, research, and impact pediatric cancer outcomes. Strategies from pedsetb's predecessor have been instrumental in the design of several of npcf's most recent clinical trials5. Evaluation of digoxin for relapsed non-wnt, non-shh medulloblastoma (phase 2 study) - this trial will evaluate the efficacy of digoxin in treating patients with relapsed non-shh, non-wnt medulloblastoma and to determine if digoxin improves progression free survival at 4 months after initiation of study treatment in this patient population. 6. Metastatic ewing's trial testing schedule enhancement to improve outcomes - this trial will test our ability to administer frequently changing chemotherapy regimens, called sequential second strikes,

Operating model

Revenue model
Donor-supported. 94% of the money available for current operations came from contributions and gifts.
Distribution model
Grant intermediary. The nonprofit sent 67% of its reported program spending out as grants.
  • Includes noncash contributions: Reported contributions include donated property or goods.

The verdict

STRONG - A large share of available resources goes toward mission work and the filed numbers largely add up. Fundraising costs are high for each dollar raised and expenses are high relative to revenue.

Rating breakdown

  • Financial Efficiency: 90
  • Transparency & Controls: 79
  • Accountability: 100
  • Sustainability: 23
  • Growth: 100

Detailed rating inputs

Financial Efficiency

  • Mission deployment rate: 100%; rating input score 100
  • Program expense ratio: 89.5%; rating input score 89
  • Fundraising efficiency: $11.85 raised per $1 spent on fundraising; rating input score 43; 43rd percentile among comparable filings

Transparency & Controls

  • Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 63rd percentile among comparable filings
  • Pay-setting controls: 2 of 6 controls in place; rating input score 33
    • Compensation committee: Missing
    • Independent consultant: Missing
    • Other Form 990s reviewed: Missing
    • Written employment contract: Pass
    • Compensation survey or study: Missing
    • Board or committee approval: Pass
  • Foreign activity oversight: Limited
  • Grant itemization coverage: 100%; rating input score 100; 72nd percentile among comparable filings
  • Major donor itemization: Yes; rating input score 100
  • Related-party transparency: Limited

Accountability

  • Independent voting board: 100%; rating input score 100; 63rd percentile among comparable filings
  • Governance controls: 9 of 9 controls in place; rating input score 100
    • Conflict-of-interest policy: Pass
    • Whistleblower policy: Pass
    • Document-retention policy: Pass
    • CEO compensation review process: Pass
    • Other executive compensation review process: Pass
    • Form 990 shared with the board: Pass
    • Board meeting minutes documented: Pass
    • Audit committee oversight: Pass
    • Independent financial-statement audit: Pass

Sustainability

  • Operating margin: -28.6%; rating input score 4; 4th percentile among comparable filings
  • Total-asset coverage ratio: 1.08; rating input score 40; 40th percentile among comparable filings
  • Liabilities to assets ratio: 0.17; rating input score 48; 48th percentile among comparable filings
  • Officer compensation ratio: 8.6%; rating input score 35; 35th percentile among comparable filings

Growth

  • Program expense growth: 9.4% per year; rating input score 100; 62nd percentile among comparable filings
  • Revenue growth: 6.6% per year; rating input score 100; 52nd percentile among comparable filings
  • Asset growth: 5.2% per year; rating input score 100; 36th percentile among comparable filings

Details

  • Where the money goes: 100% of revenue deployed · 89.5% of spending went to programs
  • Governance: 22 of 22 board members independent · 9 of 9 filing controls reported
  • Programs: 1 filed program accomplishment · $5.1M in reported program spending
  • Leadership: top reported pay $210K · 26 people listed · 2 of 6 pay-setting controls reported
  • Consistency: 37 of 37 current checks pass
  • Schedules: 7 filed schedules · includes major donors, grants, and executive pay
  • Filing history: 11 filing years from 2013 to 2024
  • Contacts: How to reach this organization
  • Money network: 19 filed money-flow records
  • Related organizations: 15 filed related-organization links
  • Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
  • People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.

Key Signals

Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.

  • Moderate — Financial Efficiency: Fundraising efficiency scored 43/100.
  • High — Sustainability: Operating margin scored 4/100.
  • Moderate — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 40/100.
  • Moderate — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 35/100.
  • Moderate — Sustainability: Liabilities to assets ratio scored 48/100.