National Organization of Coaches Associ

Nonprofit profile at a glance

EIN
731390632
IRS 990-EZ coverage
2013–2024
Forms available
Form 990-EZ 2024
Location
Greensboro, NC, USA
Phone
3363333342
Rating
66
Verdict
SUPPORTED
Rating confidence
Moderate

Reported finances

Revenue
$45,963
Expenses
$49,896
Assets
$47,646
Liabilities
$0

Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Amounts in USD.

Leadership & pay

12 people listed

Executive titles in this filing

  • DARIN BOYSIN (VICE PRESIDENT)
  • DON OLSEN (PAST PRESIDENT)
  • KEITH RICHARDSON (EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR EMERITUS)
  • JOE FRANKS (EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR)
  • ROB YOUNGER (ASST EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR)
  • SHELTON CREWS (PRESIDENT)

People named in this filing

  • VIRG POLAK (DIRECTOR)
  • CHRIS KNUDSEN (DIRECTOR)
  • GLEN WEST (DIRECTOR)

Selected names, not a complete roster or a statement of current roles. Open leadership details for the complete filed list.

Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.

Overview

Mission

The national organization of coaches association directors seeks to generate revenue and provide active support to the member states for the benefit of their high school's multi-faceted student-related activities and athletic programs. 42 member organizations and 31 member officers attended 2025 meeting. 24 states sent representatives with over 82 total attendees in 2024-2025

What it reported doing in 2024

To help state coaches associations better serve coaches throughout the united states by planning and holding meetings and events to provide assistance for coaches and athletic associations so they may be successful.

Operating model

Revenue model
Mixed. Its operating money came from several sources; no one source provided a clear majority.
Distribution model
Direct operator. The filing allocates 100% of reported program-service expenses outside its grant, affiliate-payment, and member-benefit lines. This expense classification does not rule out separately announced grant awards.

The verdict

SUPPORTED - The filed numbers largely add up and a large share of available resources goes toward mission work. A relatively small share of total spending goes to programs and program spending has declined or grown slowly.

Rating breakdown

  • Financial Efficiency: 63
  • Transparency & Controls: 82
  • Sustainability: 43
  • Growth: 0

Detailed rating inputs

Financial Efficiency

  • Mission deployment rate: 66.5%; rating input score 66
  • Program expense ratio: 59.5%; rating input score 59

Transparency & Controls

  • Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 52nd percentile among comparable filings
  • Major donor itemization: Limited

Sustainability

  • Operating margin: -8.6%; rating input score 32; 32nd percentile among comparable filings
  • Total-asset coverage ratio: 0.95; rating input score 45; 45th percentile among comparable filings
  • Liabilities to assets ratio: 0; rating input score 68; 68th percentile among comparable filings
  • Officer compensation ratio: 0%; rating input score 56; 56th percentile among comparable filings

Growth

  • Program expense growth: -12.3% per year; rating input score 0; 24th percentile among comparable filings
  • Revenue growth: -7.4% per year; rating input score 0; 29th percentile among comparable filings
  • Asset growth: -4.6% per year; rating input score 0; 25th percentile among comparable filings

Details

  • Where the money goes: 66.5% of revenue deployed · 59.5% of spending went to programs
  • Governance: Filed governance answers
  • Accomplishments: 1 filed program accomplishment · $30K in reported program spending
  • Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 12 people listed
  • Consistency: 8 of 8 current checks pass
  • Schedules: 2 filed schedules
  • Filing history: 11 filing years from 2013 to 2024
  • Contacts: How to reach this organization
  • Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
  • People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.

Key Signals

Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.

  • Review — Financial Efficiency: Program expense ratio scored 59/100.
  • High — Growth: Program expense growth scored 0/100.
  • High — Growth: Revenue growth scored 0/100.
  • Moderate — Sustainability: Operating margin scored 32/100.
  • High — Growth: Asset growth scored 0/100.
  • Moderate — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 45/100.
  • Review — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 56/100.