National Museum of Industrial History

Nonprofit profile at a glance

EIN
232912750
IRS 990 coverage
2010–2024
Forms available
Form 990 2024, Form 990-T 2023
Location
Bethlehem, PA, USA
Phone
6106946644
Rating
83
Verdict
STRONG
Rating confidence
Moderate
Sector
History Museums

Official website

Reported finances

Revenue
$1,310,548
Expenses
$1,626,494
Assets
$11,444,388
Liabilities
$1,974,015

Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Amounts in USD.

Leadership & pay

19 people listed

Executive titles in this filing

  • ANDRIA ZAIA (EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR)

Highest reported compensation

  • ANDRIA ZAIA (EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR): $76,500 total reported compensation

Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.

Overview

Mission

The mission of the national museum of industrial history, in affiliation with the smithsonian institute is: to forge a connection between america's industrial past and the innovations of today by educating the public and inspiring the visionaries of tomorrow.

What it reported doing in 2024

The national museum of industrial history celebrates the story of america's rich industrial heritage. Inventors, manufacturers, innovators, workers, and their products are showcased within a turn of the 20th century industrial building on the site of the former bethlehem steel corporation bethlehem plant.in our machinery hall, treasured artifacts on loan from the smithsonian's national museum of american history fascinate visitors. Inspired by the 1876 centennial exposition in philadelphia, visitors learn about the ingenuity of various inventors and are captivated by an impressive display of early machines; drill presses and lathes, boilers and steam engines. The iron and steel gallery conveys the massive scale of the steel industry from raw materials to manufactured product and its role in building and defending the country. Visitors learn how natural fibers were woven into silk damask and the changing nature of the american worker in factories across the nation. The propane gallery highlights the role of the scientist in creating new forms of energy. From the sounds of a moving line shafting and listening to workers' stories to giving visitors the chance to physically replicate work happening in the steel and silk mills of our region, our galleries embrace the interactive philosophy and provide hands-on experience to engage the visitor. The exhibits at nmih incorporate changing elements to allow for ongoing updating and special seasonal offerings. Many of our interpretive guides have worked in industry and provide a living reference source for inquisitive visitors and school groups. Docents are highly trained to covey complex messages in a simple manner and are the key to making the museum a place that inspires.

Operating model

Revenue model
Donor-supported. 79% of the money available for current operations came from contributions and gifts.
Distribution model
Direct operator. The filing allocates 100% of reported program-service expenses outside its grant, affiliate-payment, and member-benefit lines. This expense classification does not rule out separately announced grant awards.

The verdict

STRONG - A large share of available resources goes toward mission work and the filed numbers largely add up. Fundraising costs are high for each dollar raised and expenses are high relative to revenue.

Rating breakdown

  • Financial Efficiency: 70
  • Transparency & Controls: 92
  • Accountability: 100
  • Sustainability: 40
  • Growth: 100

Detailed rating inputs

Financial Efficiency

  • Mission deployment rate: 82.4%; rating input score 82
  • Program expense ratio: 64.5%; rating input score 64
  • Fundraising efficiency: $8.13 raised per $1 spent on fundraising; rating input score 31; 31st percentile among comparable filings

Transparency & Controls

  • Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 63rd percentile among comparable filings
  • Pay-setting controls: Limited
  • Foreign activity oversight: Limited
  • Grant itemization coverage: Limited
  • Major donor itemization: Yes; rating input score 100
  • Related-party transparency: Limited

Accountability

  • Independent voting board: 100%; rating input score 100; 63rd percentile among comparable filings
  • Governance controls: 8 of 8 controls in place; rating input score 100
    • Conflict-of-interest policy: Pass
    • Whistleblower policy: Pass
    • Document-retention policy: Pass
    • CEO compensation review process: Pass
    • Other executive compensation review process: NotApplicable
    • Form 990 shared with the board: Pass
    • Board meeting minutes documented: Pass
    • Audit committee oversight: Pass
    • Independent financial-statement audit: Pass

Sustainability

  • Operating margin: -24.1%; rating input score 8; 8th percentile among comparable filings
  • Total-asset coverage ratio: 7.04; rating input score 89; 89th percentile among comparable filings
  • Liabilities to assets ratio: 0.17; rating input score 34; 34th percentile among comparable filings
  • Officer compensation ratio: 4.7%; rating input score 54; 54th percentile among comparable filings

Growth

  • Program expense growth: 6.1% per year; rating input score 100; 48th percentile among comparable filings
  • Revenue growth: 0.5% per year; rating input score 100; 17th percentile among comparable filings
  • Asset growth: 5.9% per year; rating input score 100; 43rd percentile among comparable filings

Details

  • Where the money goes: 82.4% of revenue deployed · 64.5% of spending went to programs
  • Governance: 18 of 18 board members independent · 8 of 8 filing controls reported
  • Programs: 2 filed program accomplishments · $1M in reported program spending
  • Leadership: top reported pay $76K · 19 people listed
  • Consistency: 33 of 33 current checks pass
  • Schedules: 5 filed schedules · includes major donors
  • Filing history: 14 filing years from 2010 to 2024
  • Contacts: How to reach this organization
  • Money network: 1 filed money-flow record
  • Related organizations: Filed and resolved organization relationships.
  • Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
  • People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.

Key Signals

Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.

  • Moderate — Financial Efficiency: Fundraising efficiency scored 31/100.
  • High — Sustainability: Operating margin scored 8/100.
  • Moderate — Sustainability: Liabilities to assets ratio scored 34/100.
  • Review — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 54/100.