National Missionary Baptist Convent
Nonprofit profile at a glance
- EIN
- 352528745
- IRS 990 coverage
- 2015–2015
- Forms available
- Form 990 2015
- Location
- Dallas, TX, USA
- Phone
- 4696828191
- Rating
- 63
- Verdict
- SUPPORTED
- Rating confidence
- Moderate
- Sector
- Protestant
- Affiliation
- Christianity
Reported finances
- Revenue
- $1,257,599
- Expenses
- $77,977
- Assets
- $1,257,599
- Liabilities
- $77,977
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2015. Amounts in USD.
Leadership & pay
3 people listed
Executive titles in this filing
- NEHEMIAH DAVIS (PRESIDENT / DIRECTOR)
People named in this filing
- NEHEMIAH DAVIS (PRESIDENT / DIRECTOR)
- ARCHIE L BANKS (DIRECTOR)
- ANTHONY E SHARP I (DIRECTOR)
Selected names, not a complete roster or a statement of current roles. Open leadership details for the complete filed list.
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2015. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.
Overview
Mission
National Missionary Baptist Convention of America is a non-profit corporation with a charitable, educational and religious intent.
What it reported doing in 2015
NMBCA has held several conventions in the year informing all of our nonprofit organization efforts.
Operating model
- Revenue model
- Mixed. Its operating money came from several sources; no one source provided a clear majority.
- Distribution model
- Direct operator. The filing allocates 100% of reported program-service expenses outside its grant, affiliate-payment, and member-benefit lines. This expense classification does not rule out separately announced grant awards.
The verdict
SUPPORTED - The filed numbers largely add up and most voting board members are independent. A relatively small share of available resources goes toward mission work and some filed totals do not add up.
Rating breakdown
- Financial Efficiency: 33
- Transparency & Controls: 89
- Accountability: 94
- Sustainability: 91
- Growth: NotEnoughData
Detailed rating inputs
Financial Efficiency
- Mission deployment rate: 2.5%; rating input score 2
- Program expense ratio: 95.6%; rating input score 96
- Fundraising efficiency: Limited
Transparency & Controls
- Consistency checks: 88.9%; rating input score 89; 3rd percentile among comparable filings
- Pay-setting controls: Limited
- Foreign activity oversight: Limited
- Grant itemization coverage: Limited
- Major donor itemization: Limited
- Related-party transparency: Limited
Accountability
- Independent voting board: 100%; rating input score 100; 63rd percentile among comparable filings
- Governance controls: 6 of 7 controls in place; rating input score 86
- Conflict-of-interest policy: Pass
- Whistleblower policy: Pass
- Document-retention policy: Pass
- CEO compensation review process: NotApplicable
- Other executive compensation review process: NotApplicable
- Form 990 shared with the board: Fail
- Board meeting minutes documented: Pass
- Audit committee oversight: Pass
- Independent financial-statement audit: Pass
Sustainability
- Operating margin: 93.8%; rating input score 99; 99th percentile among comparable filings
- Total-asset coverage ratio: 16.13; rating input score 95; 95th percentile among comparable filings
- Liabilities to assets ratio: 0.06; rating input score 59; 59th percentile among comparable filings
- Officer compensation ratio: 0%; rating input score 85; 85th percentile among comparable filings
Growth
- Program expense growth: Limited
- Revenue growth: Limited
- Asset growth: Limited
Details
- Where the money goes: 2.5% of revenue deployed · 95.6% of spending went to programs
- Governance: 23 of 4 board members independent · 6 of 7 filing controls reported
- Programs: 1 filed program accomplishment
- Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 3 people listed
- Consistency: 15 of 16 current checks pass · 1 finding to review
- Schedules: 2 filed schedules
- Contacts: How to reach this organization
- Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
- People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.
Key Signals
Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.
Grant-readiness screening is separate from the live rating, not a measure of program quality. Review the source records before making a grant decision.
- High — Financial Efficiency: Mission deployment rate scored 2/100.
- Moderate — Transparency & Controls: Independent members within voting members did not reconcile in the filed values.
- Review — Accountability: Governance controls: Form 990 shared with the board not reported.
- Review — Sustainability: Liabilities to assets ratio scored 59/100.
- High — Grant Readiness: Automatic revocation: this organization had its federal tax-exempt status automatically revoked.