National Marine Sanctuary Foundation

Nonprofit profile at a glance

EIN
943370994
IRS 990 coverage
2011–2024
Forms available
Form 990 2024
Location
Silver Spring, MD, USA
Phone
3016083040
Rating
78
Verdict
SUPPORTED
Rating confidence
Moderate
Sector
Single Organization Support

Official website

Reported finances

Revenue
$35,981,845
Expenses
$35,060,994
Assets
$15,457,372
Liabilities
$9,254,155

Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Amounts in USD.

Leadership & pay

25 people listed

Executive titles in this filing

  • JOEL JOHNSON (PRESIDENT & CEO (FROM 07/2)
  • ALLISON ALEXANDER (VICE PRESIDENT OF PROGRAM)
  • SHANNON COLBERT (VICE PRESIDENT OF EXTERNAL)

Highest reported compensation

  • JOEL JOHNSON (PRESIDENT & CEO (FROM 07/2): $293,800 total reported compensation
  • VERONICA ALI (CFO): $210,712 total reported compensation
  • ALLISON ALEXANDER (VICE PRESIDENT OF PROGRAM): $183,630 total reported compensation

Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.

Overview

Mission

The national marine sanctuary foundation is a leading voice for u.s. Protected waters, working with communities to conserve and expand those special places for a healthy ocean, coasts, and great lakes. Working together, we safeguard species and the places they call home, and preserve america's maritime resources.

What it reported doing in 2024

Conservation & restoration: our national marine sanctuaries are america's protected areas of the ocean and great lakes that safeguard rich biodiversity and cultural treasures. They are home to iconic species like migratory whales, seabirds, countless fish species, and habitats such as coral reefs and towering kelp forests. All 18 national marine sanctuaries also preserve our maritime heritage, protecting historical assets like shipwrecks, aircraft, and other artifacts that reveal our nation's maritime history. The national marine sanctuary foundation funds efforts in sanctuary communities that center people and communities in the conservation, restoration, and education of our treasured waters. Our approach emphasizes funding practical resource management that supports both thriving marine industries and robust coastal tourism markets. The program works to ensure that sanctuary marine tourism sectors remain competitive and profitable for generations of american workers and business owners. We are committed to building healthier marine ecosystems and a stronger economic foundation that creates jobs and generates revenue while maintaining the natural assets that make sanctuaries a premier destination for all visitors.as hotspots for biodiversity, national marine sanctuaries are critical platforms for developing comprehensive whale protection solutions through strategic partnerships with communities, technology companies, and industry stakeholders. The foundation funds partner-led disentanglement workshops to improve emergency response and preparedness to rescue entangled whales, supports cutting-edge research to identify whale use areas to reduce co-occurrence with fishing activity, vessel traffic, and other threats, and actively tests and supports new commercial fishing gear innovations that reduce the risk of entanglements while supporting maritime economies and livelihoods. In 2024, the national marine sanctuary foundation in close partnership with noaa fisheries, funded and hosted annual training for members of the California large whale entanglement response network in monterey bay and channel islands nms. Such trainings are critical for preparing for the high season of emergency rescues and include on-the-water vessel operations where responders are able to practice valuable skills while simulating real-world rescue scenarios to practice safety and reduce risk. The foundation also achieved significant progress in testing fishing gear innovations in partnership with California fishermen, which could offer solutions to reduce whale entanglement risk while allowing fishing to continue. These trials are vital for assessing the gear's performance and feasibility in real-world conditions and for obtaining feedback on how to improve and refine the gear to meet specific needs. As of year-end 2024, commercial dungeness crab fishermen have carried out over 745 trials with five different systems.marine debris removal represents a growing initiative for the foundation, encompassing both underwater and coastal cleanup efforts. In 2024, the foundation and its partners removed 30,380 pounds of debris under the foundation sponsored i.care trash derby and the foundation's two community-based debris removal programs: goal: clean seas Florida keys and channel islands marine debris removal program in the Florida keys and channel islands (as of dec. 2024). The foundation continued its multi-year large marine debris effort, initiated in 2023, to remove large debris which includes abandoned or derelict vessels and structures, from five national marine sanctuaries. The foundation secured federal, state, and tribal permits and worked alongside ten partners at federal, state, and tribal levels to remove 16 derelict vessels, and an old bridge pontoon from the waters of the olympic coast national marine sanctuary, the quileute usual and accustomed treaty area, and the makah usual and accustomed treaty area totaling 7,896,669 pounds of debris.the nati

Operating model

Revenue model
Grant-funded. 91% of the money available for current operations came from government grants.
Distribution model
Hybrid. The nonprofit split its reported program spending across 80% for direct work, and 20% for grants.
  • Includes noncash contributions: Reported contributions include donated property or goods.

The verdict

SUPPORTED - A large share of available resources goes toward mission work and most voting board members are independent. The filing reports few safeguards for money sent abroad and fundraising costs are high for each dollar raised.

Rating breakdown

  • Financial Efficiency: 81
  • Transparency & Controls: 64
  • Accountability: 100
  • Sustainability: 34
  • Growth: 100

Detailed rating inputs

Financial Efficiency

  • Mission deployment rate: 82.8%; rating input score 83
  • Program expense ratio: 84.7%; rating input score 85
  • Fundraising efficiency: $21.4 raised per $1 spent on fundraising; rating input score 59; 59th percentile among comparable filings

Transparency & Controls

  • Consistency checks: 94.7%; rating input score 95; 24th percentile among comparable filings
  • Pay-setting controls: 2 of 6 controls in place; rating input score 33
    • Compensation committee: Missing
    • Independent consultant: Missing
    • Other Form 990s reviewed: Missing
    • Written employment contract: Missing
    • Compensation survey or study: Pass
    • Board or committee approval: Pass
  • Foreign activity oversight: Scored; rating input score 0
  • Grant itemization coverage: 93.8%; rating input score 94; 23rd percentile among comparable filings
  • Major donor itemization: Yes; rating input score 100
  • Related-party transparency: Limited

Accountability

  • Independent voting board: 100%; rating input score 100; 66th percentile among comparable filings
  • Governance controls: 9 of 9 controls in place; rating input score 100
    • Conflict-of-interest policy: Pass
    • Whistleblower policy: Pass
    • Document-retention policy: Pass
    • CEO compensation review process: Pass
    • Other executive compensation review process: Pass
    • Form 990 shared with the board: Pass
    • Board meeting minutes documented: Pass
    • Audit committee oversight: Pass
    • Independent financial-statement audit: Pass

Sustainability

  • Operating margin: 2.6%; rating input score 44; 44th percentile among comparable filings
  • Total-asset coverage ratio: 0.44; rating input score 13; 13th percentile among comparable filings
  • Liabilities to assets ratio: 0.6; rating input score 22; 22nd percentile among comparable filings
  • Officer compensation ratio: 4.2%; rating input score 58; 58th percentile among comparable filings

Growth

  • Program expense growth: 10.5% per year; rating input score 100; 72nd percentile among comparable filings
  • Revenue growth: 10% per year; rating input score 100; 74th percentile among comparable filings
  • Asset growth: 4.1% per year; rating input score 100; 29th percentile among comparable filings

Details

  • Where the money goes: 82.8% of revenue deployed · 84.7% of spending went to programs
  • Governance: 16 of 16 board members independent · 9 of 9 filing controls reported
  • Programs: 4 filed program accomplishments · $29.7M in reported program spending
  • Leadership: top reported pay $294K · 25 people listed · 2 of 6 pay-setting controls reported
  • Highest-paid contractors: 5 contractors listed · $1.2M reported
  • Consistency: 39 of 41 current checks pass · 2 findings to review
  • Schedules: 9 filed schedules · includes major donors, foreign activity, grants, and executive pay
  • Filing history: 13 filing years from 2011 to 2024
  • Contacts: How to reach this organization
  • Money network: 70 filed money-flow records
  • Related organizations: 56 filed related-organization links
  • Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
  • People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.

Key Signals

Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.

Grant-readiness screening is separate from the live rating, not a measure of program quality. Review the source records before making a grant decision.

  • High — Transparency & Controls: Foreign activity oversight scored 0/100.
  • Review — Financial Efficiency: Fundraising efficiency scored 59/100.
  • Moderate — Sustainability: Operating margin scored 44/100.
  • High — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 13/100.
  • High — Sustainability: Liabilities to assets ratio scored 22/100.
  • Moderate — Transparency & Controls: Schedule A contributions reconciliation did not reconcile in the filed values.
  • Review — Transparency & Controls: Domestic grant itemization did not reconcile in the filed values.
  • Review — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 58/100.
  • High — Grant Readiness: Federal audit findings: this organization reported findings in its latest federal Single Audit.