National League of Postmasters of the United States
Nonprofit profile at a glance
- EIN
- 520845614
- IRS 990 coverage
- 2011–2016
- Forms available
- Form 990 2016, Form 990-N 2015
- Location
- Alexandria, VA, USA
- Phone
- 7036839027
- Rating confidence
- Limited
- Sector
- Labor Unions
Reported finances
- Revenue
- $1,733,693
- Expenses
- $1,555,219
- Assets
- $0
- Liabilities
- $0
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2016. Amounts in USD.
Leadership & pay
8 people listed
Executive titles in this filing
- GREGORY SEAN ACORD (PRESIDENT)
- MICHAEL A ENGLEMAN (EXECUTIVE VICE PRESIDENT)
- GARY L CHOICE (VICE PRESIDENT)
- SHELLY M STIGALL (VICE PRESIDENT)
- DAVID WEBER (VICE PRESIDENT)
- CATHRINE R WINNIE (VICE PRESIDENT)
Highest reported compensation
- GREGORY SEAN ACORD (PRESIDENT): $124,776 total reported compensation
- SHELLY M STIGALL (VICE PRESIDENT): $4,513 total reported compensation
- CATHRINE R WINNIE (VICE PRESIDENT): $3,650 total reported compensation
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2016. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.
Overview
Mission
The national league of postmasters represents and promotes the interests of postmasters and other federal employees.
What it reported doing in 2016
Provided representation to postmasters and other federal employees for job improvements, workplace safety, job security, and other employment issues.
Operating model
- Revenue model
- Earned-program. 99% of the money available for current operations came from fees and other program revenue.
- Distribution model
- Cannot be determined from the filing. The filing does not provide enough consistent spending detail to tell whether the nonprofit works directly or through others.
The verdict
- The available evidence is not sufficient to produce an overall rating for this filing. This is not a warning sign.
Rating breakdown
- Financial Efficiency: NotEnoughData
- Transparency & Controls: 92
- Accountability: 60
- Sustainability: 37
- Growth: 0
Detailed rating inputs
Financial Efficiency
- Mission deployment rate: Limited
- Program expense ratio: Limited
- Fundraising efficiency: Limited
Transparency & Controls
- Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 62nd percentile among comparable filings
- Pay-setting controls: Limited
- Foreign activity oversight: Limited
- Grant itemization coverage: Limited
- Major donor itemization: Yes; rating input score 100
- Related-party transparency: Limited
Accountability
- Independent voting board: 87.5%; rating input score 88; 20th percentile among comparable filings
- Governance controls: 2 of 9 controls in place; rating input score 22
- Conflict-of-interest policy: Fail
- Whistleblower policy: Fail
- Document-retention policy: Fail
- CEO compensation review process: Fail
- Other executive compensation review process: Fail
- Form 990 shared with the board: Fail
- Board meeting minutes documented: Pass
- Audit committee oversight: Pass
- Independent financial-statement audit: Fail
Sustainability
- Operating margin: 10.3%; rating input score 69; 69th percentile among comparable filings
- Total-asset coverage ratio: 0; rating input score 0; 0th percentile among comparable filings
- Liabilities to assets ratio: Limited
- Officer compensation ratio: 9.1%; rating input score 39; 39th percentile among comparable filings
Growth
- Program expense growth: Limited
- Revenue growth: -8.9% per year; rating input score 0; 8th percentile among comparable filings
- Asset growth: -21.2% per year; rating input score 0; 3rd percentile among comparable filings
Details
- Where the money goes: Financial trends and filed revenue, expense, asset, and liability detail
- Governance: 7 of 8 board members independent · 2 of 9 filing controls reported
- Programs: 1 filed program accomplishment
- Leadership: top reported pay $125K · 8 people listed
- Highest-paid contractors: 1 contractor listed · $159K reported
- Consistency: 9 of 9 current checks pass
- Schedules: 6 filed schedules · includes major donors
- Filing history: 6 filing years from 2011 to 2016
- Contacts: How to reach this organization
- Money network: 8 filed money-flow records
- Related organizations: 1 filed related-organization link
- Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
- People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.
Key Signals
Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.
- High — Accountability: Governance controls: 7 of 9 not reported.
- High — Growth: Revenue growth scored 0/100.
- High — Growth: Asset growth scored 0/100.
- High — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 0/100.
- Moderate — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 39/100.