National Latino Peace Officer Association - Greater Houston Chapter

Nonprofit profile at a glance

EIN
472100152
IRS 990-EZ coverage
2017–2022
Forms available
Form 990-EZ 2022
Location
Houston, TX, USA
Phone
7133986653
Rating
36
Verdict
REVIEW
Rating confidence
Moderate
Sector
Centers to Support the Independence of Specific Populations

Official website

Reported finances

Revenue
$13,859
Expenses
$15,208
Assets
$21,632
Liabilities
$0

Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2022. Amounts in USD.

Leadership & pay

3 people listed

Executive titles in this filing

  • JOSE QUIRIN (PRESIDENT)
  • MERCEDES MARTINEZ LOPEZ (VICE PRESIDENT)

People named in this filing

  • JOSE QUIRIN (PRESIDENT)
  • MERCEDES MARTINEZ LOPEZ (VICE PRESIDENT)
  • TRIDUNG N TRAN (TREASURER)

Selected names, not a complete roster or a statement of current roles. Open leadership details for the complete filed list.

Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2022. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.

Overview

Mission

The goal of the national latino peace officer association is to focus its resources to provide professional career development and eeo advocacy for its members, provide scholarships and other support to students pursuing careers in law enforcement or related fields, to assist in community-based programs focused on time reduction, and to provide resources coupled with community efforts to advance the betterment of the communities they serve.

What it reported doing in 2022

Annual scholarship: $500 scholarship award to 10 recipients. The scholarship is awarded to high school graduates who are going to college. Award is based on academic achievements, monetary needs and recommendations from teachers.

Operating model

Revenue model
Other-operating. 60% of the money available for current operations came from other operating revenue.
Distribution model
Cannot be determined from the filing. The filing does not provide enough consistent spending detail to tell whether the nonprofit works directly or through others.

The verdict

REVIEW - The filed numbers largely add up. A relatively small share of available resources goes toward mission work and a relatively small share of total spending goes to programs.

Rating breakdown

  • Financial Efficiency: 0
  • Transparency & Controls: 82
  • Sustainability: 46
  • Growth: 20

Detailed rating inputs

Financial Efficiency

  • Mission deployment rate: 0%; rating input score 0
  • Program expense ratio: 0%; rating input score 0

Transparency & Controls

  • Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 51st percentile among comparable filings
  • Major donor itemization: Limited

Sustainability

  • Operating margin: -9.7%; rating input score 33; 33rd percentile among comparable filings
  • Total-asset coverage ratio: 1.42; rating input score 53; 53rd percentile among comparable filings
  • Liabilities to assets ratio: 0; rating input score 69; 69th percentile among comparable filings
  • Officer compensation ratio: 0%; rating input score 56; 56th percentile among comparable filings

Growth

  • Program expense growth: -47.6% per year; rating input score 0; 9th percentile among comparable filings
  • Revenue growth: -17.5% per year; rating input score 0; 18th percentile among comparable filings
  • Asset growth: 24% per year; rating input score 100; 88th percentile among comparable filings

Details

  • Where the money goes: 0% of revenue deployed · 0% of spending went to programs
  • Governance: Filed governance answers
  • Accomplishments: 3 filed program accomplishments
  • Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 3 people listed
  • Consistency: 8 of 9 current checks pass · 1 finding to review
  • Schedules: 3 filed schedules
  • Filing history: 6 filing years from 2017 to 2022
  • Contacts: How to reach this organization
  • Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
  • People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.

Key Signals

Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.

  • High — Financial Efficiency: Mission deployment rate scored 0/100.
  • High — Financial Efficiency: Program expense ratio scored 0/100.
  • Moderate — Transparency & Controls: Part III transfer expenses within program total did not reconcile in the filed values.
  • High — Growth: Program expense growth scored 0/100.
  • High — Growth: Revenue growth scored 0/100.
  • Moderate — Sustainability: Operating margin scored 33/100.
  • Review — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 53/100.
  • Review — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 56/100.