National Football Foundation and College Hall of Fame Inc-mountain Empire Chapter
Nonprofit profile at a glance
- EIN
- 621529518
- IRS 990-EZ coverage
- 2021–2021
- Forms available
- Form 990-EZ 2021
- Location
- Kingsport, TN, USA
- Phone
- 4237827392
- Rating
- 57
- Verdict
- MIXED
- Rating confidence
- Moderate
- Sector
- Museum, Museum Activities
Reported finances
- Revenue
- $15,010
- Expenses
- $12,612
- Assets
- $38,146
- Liabilities
- $0
Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2021. Amounts in USD.
Leadership & pay
7 people listed
Executive titles in this filing
- MICHAEL DAVID GONCE (PRESIDENT)
- DOUG DELLINGER (VICE-PRESIDENT)
People named in this filing
- MICHAEL DAVID GONCE (PRESIDENT)
- DOUG DELLINGER (VICE-PRESIDENT)
- BOBBY DICKEN (SECRETARY)
Selected names, not a complete roster or a statement of current roles. Open leadership details for the complete filed list.
Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2021. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.
Overview
Mission
The national football foundation mountain empire chapter is dedicated to promoting & preserving the sport of football in an effort to strengthen the educational and character-building qualities of the game. We bring together players, coaches, fans, educators, game officials, and the media to recognize student-athletes in the mountain empire region and provide scholarships to support their continued education.
What it reported doing in 2021
The organization provides educational awareness and support to current, and former, local high-school, collegiate, and professional athletes. The organization is responsible for promoting the development of character, citizenship, and scholarly mindfulness to the youth of east Tennessee, south-West Virginia, and western North Carolina. By hosting annual events, fundraisers, and collections, the organization is capable of providing a multitude of scholarships in recognition of the efforts of the region's youth.
Operating model
- Revenue model
- Mixed. Its operating money came from several sources; no one source provided a clear majority.
- Distribution model
- Grant intermediary. The nonprofit sent 76% of its reported program spending out as grants.
The verdict
MIXED - The filed numbers largely add up and revenue comfortably covers expenses. A relatively small share of available resources goes toward mission work and a relatively small share of total spending goes to programs.
Rating breakdown
- Financial Efficiency: 42
- Transparency & Controls: 82
- Sustainability: 63
- Growth: NotEnoughData
Detailed rating inputs
Financial Efficiency
- Mission deployment rate: 39.5%; rating input score 39
- Program expense ratio: 46.7%; rating input score 47
Transparency & Controls
- Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 51st percentile among comparable filings
- Major donor itemization: Limited
Sustainability
- Operating margin: 16%; rating input score 61; 61st percentile among comparable filings
- Total-asset coverage ratio: 3.02; rating input score 68; 68th percentile among comparable filings
- Liabilities to assets ratio: 0; rating input score 69; 69th percentile among comparable filings
- Officer compensation ratio: 0%; rating input score 56; 56th percentile among comparable filings
Growth
- Program expense growth: Limited
- Revenue growth: Limited
- Asset growth: Limited
Details
- Where the money goes: 39.5% of revenue deployed · 46.7% of spending went to programs
- Governance: Filed governance answers
- Accomplishments: 1 filed program accomplishment · $6K in reported program spending
- Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 7 people listed
- Consistency: 9 of 9 current checks pass
- Schedules: 3 filed schedules
- Contacts: How to reach this organization
- Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
- People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.
Key Signals
Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.
Grant-readiness screening is separate from the live rating, not a measure of program quality. Review the source records before making a grant decision.
- Moderate — Financial Efficiency: Mission deployment rate scored 39/100.
- Moderate — Financial Efficiency: Program expense ratio scored 47/100.
- Review — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 56/100.
- High — Grant Readiness: Automatic revocation: this organization had its federal tax-exempt status automatically revoked.