National Fatherhood Leaders Group Inc
Nonprofit profile at a glance
- EIN
- 454542131
- IRS 990-EZ coverage
- 2014–2014
- Forms available
- Form 990-EZ 2014, Form 990-N 2013
- Location
- Washington, DC, USA
- Phone
- 7176376518
- Rating
- 89
- Verdict
- STRONG
- Rating confidence
- Moderate
- Sector
- Prison Alternatives
Reported finances
- Revenue
- $53,900
- Expenses
- $56,505
- Assets
- $1,864
Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2014. Amounts in USD.
Leadership & pay
4 people listed
People named in this filing
- JEFFERY M JOHNSON PHD (INTERIM CHAIR)
- RONALD B MINCY PHD (INTERIM VICE CHAIR & SECRETARY)
- CAREY CASEY (TREASURER)
Selected names, not a complete roster or a statement of current roles. Open leadership details for the complete filed list.
Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2014. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.
Overview
Mission
To provide collaborative leadership to support individuals and organizations working to build and raise the awareness of the importance of fathers in the lives of all children and families. NFLG does not provide direct service to individuals, though we will on occasion respond to an individual request for the name of a fatherhood resource in a particular geographic area.
What it reported doing in 2014
Communication- to maintain, update and upgrade NFLG's website, have and maintain an electronic database for large email communication and produce and disseminate an electronic newsletter to keep the responsible fatherhood field informed on grant opportunities and topics of interest. Database contains 1,800+ contacts.
Operating model
- Revenue model
- Donor-supported. 97% of the money available for current operations came from contributions and gifts.
- Distribution model
- Direct operator. The filing allocates 100% of reported program-service expenses outside its grant, affiliate-payment, and member-benefit lines. This expense classification does not rule out separately announced grant awards.
The verdict
STRONG - A large share of available resources goes toward mission work and the filed numbers largely add up. Expenses are high relative to revenue and total assets are small relative to annual expenses; liquid coverage is unknown.
Rating breakdown
- Financial Efficiency: 96
- Transparency & Controls: 100
- Sustainability: 18
- Growth: NotEnoughData
Detailed rating inputs
Financial Efficiency
- Mission deployment rate: 98.3%; rating input score 98
- Program expense ratio: 93.7%; rating input score 94
Transparency & Controls
- Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 51st percentile among comparable filings
- Major donor itemization: Yes; rating input score 100
Sustainability
- Operating margin: -4.8%; rating input score 35; 35th percentile among comparable filings
- Total-asset coverage ratio: 0.03; rating input score 5; 5th percentile among comparable filings
- Liabilities to assets ratio: Limited
- Officer compensation ratio: 56.6%; rating input score 2; 2nd percentile among comparable filings
Growth
- Program expense growth: Limited
- Revenue growth: Limited
- Asset growth: Limited
Details
- Where the money goes: 98.3% of revenue deployed · 93.7% of spending went to programs
- Governance: Filed governance answers
- Accomplishments: 4 filed program accomplishments · $53K in reported program spending
- Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 4 people listed
- Consistency: 6 of 6 current checks pass
- Schedules: 3 filed schedules
- Contacts: How to reach this organization
- Money network: 1 filed money-flow record
- Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
- People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.
Key Signals
Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.
- Moderate — Sustainability: Operating margin scored 35/100.
- High — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 5/100.
- High — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 2/100.