National Extension Association of Family & Consumer Sciences
Legal name: National Extension Association of Family and Consumer Sciences Awards
Nonprofit profile at a glance
- EIN
- 237024635
- IRS 990 coverage
- 2016–2025
- Official website data refreshed
- Sep 2026
- Forms available
- Form 990 2025, Form 990-EZ 2019
- Location
- Tallahassee, FL, USA
- Phone
- 850-205-5638
- Rating
- 71
- Verdict
- SUPPORTED
- Rating confidence
- Moderate
- Sector
- Elementary, Secondary Education, K - 12
Reported finances
- Revenue
- $228,177
- Expenses
- $63,598
- Assets
- $830,746
- Liabilities
- $1,268
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2025. Amounts in USD.
Leadership & pay
19 people listed
People named in this filing
- TROY ANTHONY ANDERSON (VP MBR RESOU)
- JENNIFER BRIDGE (PRES/IMMED P)
- DIANNE CHRISTENSEN (PRES ELECT/P)
Selected names, not a complete roster or a statement of current roles. Open leadership details for the complete filed list.
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2025. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.
Overview
Mission
Mission, Vision, and Creed Mission Statement NEAFCS empowers Extension professionals to lead effectively through research-based professional development, recognition, and the promotion of Extension Family and Consumer Sciences. NEAFCS empowers Extension professionals to lead effectively through research-based professional development, recognition, and the promotion of Extension Family and Consumer Sciences. Our Vision. The National Extension Association of Family & Consumer Sciences (NEAFCS) supports and elevates Family & Consumer Sciences (FCS) Extension professionals who strengthen individuals, families, and communities every day. FCS Extension professionals deliver research-based education that improves health, financial security, food safety, workforce readiness, and overall quality of life. Through professional development, leadership opportunities, and national collaboration...
What it reported doing in 2025
Awards, grants & fellowships given at the annual meeting to family & consumer sciences educators for outstanding research and program development and implementation. Over 200 family & consumer science educators were recognized at the 2025 annual meeting.
Operating model
- Revenue model
- Donor-supported. 62% of the money available for current operations came from contributions and gifts.
- Distribution model
- Grant intermediary. The nonprofit sent 60% of its reported program spending out as grants.
The verdict
SUPPORTED - The filed numbers largely add up and most voting board members are independent. A relatively small share of available resources goes toward mission work and some filing-based governance responses are negative or unanswered.
Rating breakdown
- Financial Efficiency: 46
- Transparency & Controls: 83
- Accountability: 94
- Sustainability: 86
- Growth: 100
Detailed rating inputs
Financial Efficiency
- Mission deployment rate: 27.2%; rating input score 27
- Program expense ratio: 92.2%; rating input score 92
- Fundraising efficiency: Limited
Transparency & Controls
- Consistency checks: 90.9%; rating input score 91; 15th percentile among comparable filings
- Pay-setting controls: Limited
- Foreign activity oversight: Limited
- Grant itemization coverage: 75.6%; rating input score 76; 50th percentile among comparable filings
- Major donor itemization: Yes; rating input score 100
- Related-party transparency: Limited
Accountability
- Independent voting board: 100%; rating input score 100; 64th percentile among comparable filings
- Governance controls: 6 of 7 controls in place; rating input score 86
- Conflict-of-interest policy: Pass
- Whistleblower policy: Pass
- Document-retention policy: Pass
- CEO compensation review process: NotApplicable
- Other executive compensation review process: NotApplicable
- Form 990 shared with the board: Fail
- Board meeting minutes documented: Pass
- Audit committee oversight: Pass
- Independent financial-statement audit: Pass
Sustainability
- Operating margin: 72.1%; rating input score 96; 96th percentile among comparable filings
- Total-asset coverage ratio: 13.06; rating input score 92; 92nd percentile among comparable filings
- Liabilities to assets ratio: 0; rating input score 49; 49th percentile among comparable filings
- Officer compensation ratio: 0%; rating input score 67; 67th percentile among comparable filings
Growth
- Program expense growth: 19.7% per year; rating input score 100; 83rd percentile among comparable filings
- Revenue growth: 7.7% per year; rating input score 100; 61st percentile among comparable filings
- Asset growth: 6.4% per year; rating input score 100; 50th percentile among comparable filings
Details
- What they do: 2 programs and campaigns described on the official site · 1 operating location identified
- Where the money goes: 27.2% of revenue deployed · 92.2% of spending went to programs
- Governance: 13 of 13 board members independent · 6 of 7 filing controls reported
- Programs: 1 filed program accomplishment · $59K in reported program spending
- Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 19 people listed
- Consistency: 16 of 17 current checks pass · 1 finding to review
- Schedules: 6 filed schedules · includes major donors and grants
- Filing history: 9 filing years from 2016 to 2025
- Contacts: How to reach this organization
- Money network: 1 filed money-flow record
- Related organizations: 2 filed related-organization links
- Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
- People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.
Key Signals
Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.
- High — Financial Efficiency: Mission deployment rate scored 27/100.
- Review — Accountability: Governance controls: Form 990 shared with the board not reported.
- Review — Transparency & Controls: Domestic grant itemization did not reconcile in the filed values.
- Moderate — Sustainability: Liabilities to assets ratio scored 49/100.