National Ethnic Albanian American Foundation Inc

Nonprofit profile at a glance

EIN
521622672
IRS 990-EZ coverage
2010–2025
Forms available
Form 990 2022, Form 990-EZ 2025
Location
Ossining, NY, USA
Phone
9147625530
Rating
70
Verdict
SUPPORTED
Rating confidence
Moderate

Reported finances

Revenue
$100,286
Expenses
$77,695
Assets
$50,699
Liabilities
$0

Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2025. Amounts in USD.

Leadership & pay

4 people listed

Executive titles in this filing

  • SHIRLEY A CLOYES (PRESIDENT / DIRECTOR)

People named in this filing

  • SHIRLEY A CLOYES (PRESIDENT / DIRECTOR)
  • JOSEPH J DIOGUARDI (TREASURER / DIRECTOR)
  • LEKA REZNIQI (DIRECTOR)

Selected names, not a complete roster or a statement of current roles. Open leadership details for the complete filed list.

Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2025. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.

Overview

Mission

To educate americans about the political, economic and physical conditions affecting seven million ethnic albanians living side by side in the balkan jurisdictions of albania, kosova, macedonia, montenegro, serbia and greece. These albanians are united by language, history and culture but have been divided by artificial borders imposed by others without their consent.

What it reported doing in 2025

See schedule o - statement of program service accomplishments for details

Operating model

Revenue model
Donor-supported. 100% of the money available for current operations came from contributions and gifts.
Distribution model
Direct operator. The filing allocates 100% of reported program-service expenses outside its grant, affiliate-payment, and member-benefit lines. This expense classification does not rule out separately announced grant awards.

The verdict

SUPPORTED - The filed numbers largely add up and program spending has grown recently. A relatively small share of available resources goes toward mission work and a relatively small share of total spending goes to programs.

Rating breakdown

  • Financial Efficiency: 44
  • Transparency & Controls: 100
  • Sustainability: 58
  • Growth: 100

Detailed rating inputs

Financial Efficiency

  • Mission deployment rate: 39.9%; rating input score 40
  • Program expense ratio: 51.4%; rating input score 51

Transparency & Controls

  • Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 52nd percentile among comparable filings
  • Major donor itemization: Yes; rating input score 100

Sustainability

  • Operating margin: 22.5%; rating input score 74; 74th percentile among comparable filings
  • Total-asset coverage ratio: 0.65; rating input score 45; 45th percentile among comparable filings
  • Liabilities to assets ratio: 0; rating input score 74; 74th percentile among comparable filings
  • Officer compensation ratio: 43.7%; rating input score 7; 7th percentile among comparable filings

Growth

  • Program expense growth: 1.2% per year; rating input score 100; 32nd percentile among comparable filings
  • Revenue growth: 2.5% per year; rating input score 100; 30th percentile among comparable filings
  • Asset growth: 12.5% per year; rating input score 100; 65th percentile among comparable filings

Details

  • Where the money goes: 39.9% of revenue deployed · 51.4% of spending went to programs
  • Governance: Filed governance answers
  • Accomplishments: 1 filed program accomplishment · $40K in reported program spending
  • Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 4 people listed
  • Consistency: 8 of 8 current checks pass
  • Schedules: 3 filed schedules
  • Filing history: 15 filing years from 2010 to 2025
  • Contacts: How to reach this organization
  • Money network: 3 filed money-flow records
  • Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
  • People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.

Key Signals

Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.

  • Moderate — Financial Efficiency: Mission deployment rate scored 40/100.
  • Review — Financial Efficiency: Program expense ratio scored 51/100.
  • Moderate — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 45/100.
  • High — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 7/100.