National Emergency Number Association Texas Chapter
Nonprofit profile at a glance
- EIN
- 760208338
- IRS 990-EZ coverage
- 2010–2024
- Forms available
- Form 990-EZ 2024
- Location
- Weslaco, TX, USA
- Phone
- 9566823481
- Rating
- 77
- Verdict
- SUPPORTED
- Rating confidence
- Moderate
Reported finances
- Revenue
- $101,841
- Expenses
- $57,910
- Assets
- $178,965
- Liabilities
- $0
Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Amounts in USD.
Leadership & pay
12 people listed
Executive titles in this filing
- LETICIA TRUEX (2ND VICE PRESIDENT)
- PAMELA FRISK (IMMEDIATE PAST PRESIDENT)
- RAYMOND PHERIS (PRESIDENT)
- KENNETH ENNIS (1ST VICE PRESIDENT)
People named in this filing
- JACOREY GLAUDE (OFFICER)
- KELLE HALL (SECRETARY)
- LETICIA TRUEX (2ND VICE PRESIDENT)
Selected names, not a complete roster or a statement of current roles. Open leadership details for the complete filed list.
Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.
Overview
Mission
To foster the development, availability and implementation of the universal emergency telephone number, 9-1-1, common to all areas of the state of Texas, through research, planning, training and education.to define the purpose and procedures for application and distribution of financial assistance to any professional in the public safety communications field who meets the requirements with a qualifying event that affects their personal life, or the life of an immediate family member.
What it reported doing in 2024
Expenses incurred to provide educational seminars for current issues relating to the universal emergency telephone number.
Operating model
- Revenue model
- Earned-program. 85% of the money available for current operations came from fees and other program revenue.
- Distribution model
- Direct operator. The filing allocates 87% of reported program-service expenses outside its grant, affiliate-payment, and member-benefit lines. This expense classification does not rule out separately announced grant awards.
The verdict
SUPPORTED - A large share of total spending goes to programs and the filed numbers largely add up. A relatively small share of available resources goes toward mission work and assets have declined or grown slowly.
Rating breakdown
- Financial Efficiency: 72
- Transparency & Controls: 82
- Sustainability: 86
- Growth: 80
Detailed rating inputs
Financial Efficiency
- Mission deployment rate: 55.2%; rating input score 55
- Program expense ratio: 100%; rating input score 100
Transparency & Controls
- Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 52nd percentile among comparable filings
- Major donor itemization: Limited
Sustainability
- Operating margin: 43.1%; rating input score 91; 91st percentile among comparable filings
- Total-asset coverage ratio: 3.09; rating input score 90; 90th percentile among comparable filings
- Liabilities to assets ratio: 0; rating input score 76; 76th percentile among comparable filings
- Officer compensation ratio: 0%; rating input score 63; 63rd percentile among comparable filings
Growth
- Program expense growth: 12.4% per year; rating input score 100; 66th percentile among comparable filings
- Revenue growth: 9.7% per year; rating input score 100; 66th percentile among comparable filings
- Asset growth: -0.9% per year; rating input score 0; 25th percentile among comparable filings
Details
- Where the money goes: 55.2% of revenue deployed · 100% of spending went to programs
- Governance: Filed governance answers
- Accomplishments: 1 filed program accomplishment · $58K in reported program spending
- Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 12 people listed
- Consistency: 9 of 9 current checks pass
- Schedules: 2 filed schedules
- Filing history: 14 filing years from 2010 to 2024
- Contacts: How to reach this organization
- Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
- People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.
Key Signals
Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.
- Review — Financial Efficiency: Mission deployment rate scored 55/100.
- High — Growth: Asset growth scored 0/100.