National Council on Alcoholism and Drug Dependencewestchester Inc
Nonprofit profile at a glance
- EIN
- 134180270
- IRS 990 coverage
- 2013–2024
- Forms available
- Form 990 2024
- Location
- White Plains, NY, USA
- Phone
- 9149498500
- Rating
- 75
- Verdict
- SUPPORTED
- Rating confidence
- Moderate
- Sector
- Rehabilitative Medical Services
Reported finances
- Revenue
- $362,110
- Expenses
- $385,038
- Assets
- $134,441
- Liabilities
- $50,522
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Amounts in USD.
Leadership & pay
16 people listed
Executive titles in this filing
- LOWES MOORE (Vice President)
- NATASHA SILVERBELL (Vice President)
- DAIR MELENDEZ-DIER (President)
Highest reported compensation
- JOAN BONSIGNORE (Executive Direc): $25,000 total reported compensation
- STEPHANIE ZANGRILLO-NEVILLE (Treasurer): $15,313 total reported compensation
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.
Overview
Mission
The mission of the council is to provide information, education, prevention and referrals. Thier goal is to educate the public regarding the treatment and prevention of the disease of alcoholism and chemical dependency and to help eradicate the stigma surrounding this disease.
What it reported doing in 2024
Provides leadership in the formulation of public policy, gathers and disseminates educational information to the public and improves the awareness and understanding of other professionals concerning the disease of alcoholism, drug addiction and the related problems.
Operating model
- Revenue model
- Earned-program. 88% of the money available for current operations came from fees and other program revenue.
- Distribution model
- Direct operator. The filing allocates 100% of reported program-service expenses outside its grant, affiliate-payment, and member-benefit lines. This expense classification does not rule out separately announced grant awards.
- Includes noncash contributions: Reported contributions include donated property or goods.
The verdict
SUPPORTED - The filed numbers largely add up and a large share of available resources goes toward mission work. Fundraising costs are high for each dollar raised and some filing-based governance responses are negative or unanswered.
Rating breakdown
- Financial Efficiency: 68
- Transparency & Controls: 92
- Accountability: 72
- Sustainability: 23
- Growth: 100
Detailed rating inputs
Financial Efficiency
- Mission deployment rate: 77.6%; rating input score 78
- Program expense ratio: 72.9%; rating input score 73
- Fundraising efficiency: $0.68 raised per $1 spent on fundraising; rating input score 5; 5th percentile among comparable filings
Transparency & Controls
- Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 64th percentile among comparable filings
- Pay-setting controls: Limited
- Foreign activity oversight: Limited
- Grant itemization coverage: Limited
- Major donor itemization: Yes; rating input score 100
- Related-party transparency: Limited
Accountability
- Independent voting board: 87.5%; rating input score 88; 24th percentile among comparable filings
- Governance controls: 4 of 8 controls in place; rating input score 50
- Conflict-of-interest policy: Pass
- Whistleblower policy: Pass
- Document-retention policy: Pass
- CEO compensation review process: NotApplicable
- Other executive compensation review process: Fail
- Form 990 shared with the board: Pass
- Board meeting minutes documented: Fail
- Audit committee oversight: Missing
- Independent financial-statement audit: Fail
Sustainability
- Operating margin: -6.3%; rating input score 27; 27th percentile among comparable filings
- Total-asset coverage ratio: 0.35; rating input score 18; 18th percentile among comparable filings
- Liabilities to assets ratio: 0.38; rating input score 14; 14th percentile among comparable filings
- Officer compensation ratio: 10.5%; rating input score 28; 28th percentile among comparable filings
Growth
- Program expense growth: 5.6% per year; rating input score 100; 56th percentile among comparable filings
- Revenue growth: 7.1% per year; rating input score 100; 62nd percentile among comparable filings
- Asset growth: 9.5% per year; rating input score 100; 64th percentile among comparable filings
Details
- Where the money goes: 77.6% of revenue deployed · 72.9% of spending went to programs
- Governance: 14 of 16 board members independent · 4 of 8 filing controls reported
- Programs: 2 filed program accomplishments · $281K in reported program spending
- Leadership: top reported pay $25K · 16 people listed
- Consistency: 23 of 23 current checks pass
- Schedules: 5 filed schedules · includes major donors
- Filing history: 8 filing years from 2013 to 2024
- Contacts: How to reach this organization
- Money network: 2 filed money-flow records
- Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
- People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.
Key Signals
Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.
- High — Financial Efficiency: Fundraising efficiency scored 5/100.
- Review — Accountability: Governance controls: 3 of 7 not reported.
- High — Sustainability: Operating margin scored 27/100.
- High — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 18/100.
- High — Sustainability: Liabilities to assets ratio scored 14/100.
- High — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 28/100.