NATIONAL COUNCIL OF NEGRO WOMEN INC Mitchellville-Bowie Section

Nonprofit profile at a glance

EIN
911931339
IRS 990-EZ coverage
2024–2024
Forms available
Form 990-EZ 2024, Form 990-N 2023
Location
Largo, MD, USA
Phone
2022850539
Rating
51
Verdict
MIXED
Rating confidence
Moderate

Official website

Reported finances

Revenue
$19,342
Expenses
$17,164
Assets
$71,282
Liabilities
$0

Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Amounts in USD.

Leadership & pay

8 people listed

Executive titles in this filing

  • Leslie Johnson (President)
  • Tavia McClam King (First Vice President)
  • Josephine Wadley (Second Vice President)
  • Davida Patton (Third Vice President)

People named in this filing

  • Leslie Johnson (President)
  • Tavia McClam King (First Vice President)
  • Josephine Wadley (Second Vice President)

Selected names, not a complete roster or a statement of current roles. Open leadership details for the complete filed list.

Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.

Overview

Mission

Lead, advocate for and empower women, their families and communities

What it reported doing in 2024

Health Equity: Executed programs that advanced health equity by providing community education on key health initiatives, supporting a local college's Nutrition Lounge with non perishable food donations to reduce food insecurity, and supplying a local high school hygiene closet with essential menstrual products. The program further promoted awareness, prevention, and intervention through multiple webinars and in person presentations that informed individuals about health risks, encouraged preventive practices such as screenings and healthy habits, and offered guidance on illness management, chronic disease impact reduction, and rehabilitation. Additionally, partnered with a local civic organization to host a Red Cross blood drive in which more than 30 individuals were vetted and donated blood.

Operating model

Revenue model
Membership-supported. 66% of the money available for current operations came from membership dues.
Distribution model
Hybrid. The nonprofit split its reported program spending across 47% for direct work, and 53% for grants.

The verdict

MIXED - The filed numbers largely add up and revenue comfortably covers expenses. A relatively small share of available resources goes toward mission work and a relatively small share of total spending goes to programs.

Rating breakdown

  • Financial Efficiency: 30
  • Transparency & Controls: 82
  • Sustainability: 69
  • Growth: NotEnoughData

Detailed rating inputs

Financial Efficiency

  • Mission deployment rate: 28.4%; rating input score 28
  • Program expense ratio: 32%; rating input score 32

Transparency & Controls

  • Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 52nd percentile among comparable filings
  • Major donor itemization: Limited

Sustainability

  • Operating margin: 11.3%; rating input score 64; 64th percentile among comparable filings
  • Total-asset coverage ratio: 4.15; rating input score 81; 81st percentile among comparable filings
  • Liabilities to assets ratio: 0; rating input score 68; 68th percentile among comparable filings
  • Officer compensation ratio: 0%; rating input score 56; 56th percentile among comparable filings

Growth

  • Program expense growth: Limited
  • Revenue growth: Limited
  • Asset growth: Limited

Details

  • Where the money goes: 28.4% of revenue deployed · 32% of spending went to programs
  • Governance: Filed governance answers
  • Accomplishments: 4 filed program accomplishments · $5K in reported program spending
  • Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 8 people listed
  • Consistency: 9 of 9 current checks pass
  • Schedules: 3 filed schedules
  • Contacts: How to reach this organization
  • Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
  • People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.

Key Signals

Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.

  • High — Financial Efficiency: Mission deployment rate scored 28/100.
  • Moderate — Financial Efficiency: Program expense ratio scored 32/100.
  • Review — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 56/100.