National Council of Jewish Women St. Louis

Nonprofit profile at a glance

EIN
430722936
IRS 990 coverage
2010–2024
Official website data refreshed
Sep 2026
Forms available
Form 990 2024
Location
St. Louis, MO, USA
Phone
314.993.5181
Rating
71
Verdict
SUPPORTED
Rating confidence
Moderate
Sector
Women's Service Clubs
Affiliation
Judaism

Official website

Reported finances

Revenue
$4,742,576
Expenses
$1,610,791
Assets
$10,156,435
Liabilities
$3,531,032

Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Amounts in USD.

Leadership & pay

35 people listed

Executive titles in this filing

  • PHYLLIS LANGSDORF (PRESIDENT)
  • NANCY LITZ (IMMEDIATE PAST PRESIDENT)
  • ELLEN ALPER (CEO)

Highest reported compensation

  • ELLEN ALPER (CEO): $123,531 total reported compensation
  • JAYNE STUCKEY (COO): $20,740 total reported compensation

Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.

Overview

Mission

NCJWSTL is inspired by Jewish values to advance social and economic justice for all women, children, and families. 1. Personal, or "individually identifiable," information you provide to us; and 2. Standard web server/visitor traffic information, commonly referred to as "aggregate information," regarding overall Web site traffic patterns. Normally, web servers collect this type of basic information as part of their web log processes. We do not report on individual user sessions. While processing your visit to our site, there are instances when NCJW collects individually identifiable information in order to better facilitate the purpose of your visit. For example if you wish to donate to NCJW or any of its programs, we will collect such as your first and last name, street address, city, state, zip code, t.

What it reported doing in 2024

Back to school! Store and kids community closet: the back to school! Store is a one-day event set up like a department store. Each child isassigned an adult volunteer to help him or her shop for free for clothing and school supplies. In collaboration with over 75 communityorganizations, ncjw provides programming in the areas of child safety, nutrition, vision screening, health issues, etc., forparents/guardians and children. A new "family resource guide" has been developed to provide important information about all theservices available in our region to support the families and children. Each child receives everything they need to start the school year: clothing, coat, shoes, undergarments, backpack, book and school supplies. (see schedule o)(back to school! Store and kids community closet continued)everything is brand-new and chosen by the child with their personal shopper. The child's self-esteem and excitement to begin the school year are paramount to the running of this project.kids community closet provides children with items they may need on a daily basis at school, whether due to an emergency or an ongoing family situation. Closets stocked with new clothing and uniformsare placed in underserved schools, where 70% or more of the children live at or below the federal poverty level. The clothing, personal care items and school supplies we supply to these young students are distributed on an as-needed and ongoing basis. Children can attend school confidently, in clean, new clothes that fit, and with the supplies they need. It is also our goal to relieve the financial burden currently placed on the teachers and administrators who find it necessary to personally purchase these emergency items for their students on an ongoing basis. Having a closet in the school will help teachers, counselors and administrators meet an immediate need and get right back to the mission of education.eligible kids will predominantly range in age from pre-kindergarten to fifth grade. In some cases the program will reach out to middle school and preschool children as well. Over 13,000 children have access to the closets on any given day.

Operating model

Revenue model
Donor-supported. 94% of the money available for current operations came from contributions and gifts.
Distribution model
Direct operator. The filing allocates 83% of reported program-service expenses outside its grant, affiliate-payment, and member-benefit lines. This expense classification does not rule out separately announced grant awards.
  • Includes noncash contributions: Reported contributions include donated property or goods.

The verdict

SUPPORTED - The filed numbers largely add up and most voting board members are independent. A relatively small share of available resources goes toward mission work and fundraising costs are high for each dollar raised.

Rating breakdown

  • Financial Efficiency: 40
  • Transparency & Controls: 94
  • Accountability: 91
  • Sustainability: 78
  • Growth: 100

Detailed rating inputs

Financial Efficiency

  • Mission deployment rate: 24.2%; rating input score 24
  • Program expense ratio: 64.2%; rating input score 64
  • Fundraising efficiency: $13.15 raised per $1 spent on fundraising; rating input score 47; 47th percentile among comparable filings

Transparency & Controls

  • Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 63rd percentile among comparable filings
  • Pay-setting controls: Limited
  • Foreign activity oversight: Limited
  • Grant itemization coverage: 100%; rating input score 100; 72nd percentile among comparable filings
  • Major donor itemization: Yes; rating input score 100
  • Related-party transparency: Limited

Accountability

  • Independent voting board: 100%; rating input score 100; 63rd percentile among comparable filings
  • Governance controls: 7 of 9 controls in place; rating input score 78
    • Conflict-of-interest policy: Pass
    • Whistleblower policy: Pass
    • Document-retention policy: Pass
    • CEO compensation review process: Pass
    • Other executive compensation review process: Fail
    • Form 990 shared with the board: Fail
    • Board meeting minutes documented: Pass
    • Audit committee oversight: Pass
    • Independent financial-statement audit: Pass

Sustainability

  • Operating margin: 66%; rating input score 96; 96th percentile among comparable filings
  • Total-asset coverage ratio: 6.31; rating input score 86; 86th percentile among comparable filings
  • Liabilities to assets ratio: 0.35; rating input score 30; 30th percentile among comparable filings
  • Officer compensation ratio: 9%; rating input score 33; 33rd percentile among comparable filings

Growth

  • Program expense growth: 5.8% per year; rating input score 100; 44th percentile among comparable filings
  • Revenue growth: 12.8% per year; rating input score 100; 77th percentile among comparable filings
  • Asset growth: 10.5% per year; rating input score 100; 60th percentile among comparable filings

Details

  • What they do: 2 programs and campaigns described on the official site
  • Where the money goes: 24.2% of revenue deployed · 64.2% of spending went to programs
  • Governance: 33 of 33 board members independent · 7 of 9 filing controls reported
  • Programs: 6 filed program accomplishments · $1M in reported program spending
  • Leadership: top reported pay $124K · 35 people listed
  • Consistency: 32 of 33 current checks pass · 1 finding to review
  • Schedules: 9 filed schedules · includes major donors and grants
  • Filing history: 15 filing years from 2010 to 2024
  • Contacts: How to reach this organization
  • Money network: 3 filed money-flow records
  • Related organizations: 2 filed related-organization links
  • Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
  • People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.

Key Signals

Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.

  • High — Financial Efficiency: Mission deployment rate scored 24/100.
  • Moderate — Financial Efficiency: Fundraising efficiency scored 47/100.
  • Review — Accountability: Governance controls: 2 of 9 not reported.
  • Moderate — Transparency & Controls: Schedule A contributions reconciliation did not reconcile in the filed values.
  • Moderate — Sustainability: Liabilities to assets ratio scored 30/100.
  • Moderate — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 33/100.