National Council of Jewish Women New York
Legal name: National Council of Jewish Women New York Section
Nonprofit profile at a glance
- EIN
- 131624132
- IRS 990 coverage
- 2010–2024
- Official website data refreshed
- Aug 2026
- Forms available
- Form 990 2024
- Location
- New York, NY, USA
- Phone
- 212-687-5030
- Rating
- 82
- Verdict
- STRONG
- Rating confidence
- Moderate
- Sector
- Women's Service Clubs
- Affiliation
- Judaism
Reported finances
- Revenue
- $2,631,655
- Expenses
- $2,228,393
- Assets
- $5,225,213
- Liabilities
- $95,825
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Amounts in USD.
Leadership & pay
14 people listed
Executive titles in this filing
- KAROL TODRYS (CO-PRESIDENT)
- WENDY HASHMALL (CO-PRESIDENT)
- MEREDITH BARNETT (VICE PRESIDENT)
- ANDREA KOPEL (EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR)
Highest reported compensation
- ANDREA KOPEL (EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR): $136,267 total reported compensation
- AMY GREENSTEIN (DIRECTOR OF DEVELOPMENT): $135,549 total reported compensation
- MARGARITA SHAPIRO (DIRECTOR OF FINANACE): $115,715 total reported compensation
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.
Overview
Mission
National Council of Jewish Women New York (NCJW NY) is a grassroots organization of volunteers and advocates who turn progressive ideals into action. Inspired by Jewish values, NCJW NY strives for social justice by improving the quality of life for women, children, and families and by safeguarding individual rights and freedoms. Our hands-on approach combines direct social services to alleviate the effects of poverty and inequity today and passionate, focused advocacy to make lasting systemic change for the future.
What it reported doing in 2024
Other program: 1) lunch, interaction, nurturing, and companionship (linc) - linc is an innovative day program that engages adults suffering from memory loss and dementia through art, music, and recreational activities in an intimate, controlled environment. The program operates three times a week, involving both elders and their caregivers. Far more than a respite care or daycare program, linc provides individualized attention and meets each client where they are, modeling positive interaction for caregivers. Linc stimulates participants and encourages positive self-expression, improving their mood and function throughout the day and the week. Linc is an intimate program by design, serving a roster of 15 to 20 participants at any given time. 2) pregnancy loss support program - plsp utilizes professionally trained volunteers to provide telephone counseling and to facilitate in-person and virtual support groups for parents who have experienced miscarriage, stillbirth, or newborn death. All of our volunteers have experienced a loss themselves, so they can speak from experience to grieving parents, and at the same time continue their own healing process through service to others. Last year the program served more than 200 families. 3) advocacy - ncjw ny pursues vigorous and strategic advocacy to pursue and protect reproductive and economic justice for women. Our pro-truth campaign works to expose and fight the tactics of so-called "crisis pregnancy centers" (fake abortion clinics), ensuring that all women have access to comprehensive and accurate information about their reproductive health and options. Our jews for repro ny initiative works to reclaim the narrative around faith, religion, and abortion. We maintain strong relationships with our state and local elected representatives and invite experts to speak to our community about these issues and others that concern us and our community. On the national level, ncjw, inc.'s Washington, dc headquarters advocates at the federal level and helps coordinate grassroots advocacy nationwide.
Operating model
- Revenue model
- Donor-supported. 83% of the money available for current operations came from contributions and gifts.
- Distribution model
- Direct operator. The filing allocates 98% of reported program-service expenses outside its grant, affiliate-payment, and member-benefit lines. This expense classification does not rule out separately announced grant awards.
- Includes noncash contributions: Reported contributions include donated property or goods.
The verdict
STRONG - The filed numbers largely add up and a large share of available resources goes toward mission work. Fundraising costs are high for each dollar raised and assets have declined or grown slowly.
Rating breakdown
- Financial Efficiency: 68
- Transparency & Controls: 92
- Accountability: 100
- Sustainability: 64
- Growth: 80
Detailed rating inputs
Financial Efficiency
- Mission deployment rate: 70.4%; rating input score 70
- Program expense ratio: 76.6%; rating input score 77
- Fundraising efficiency: $7.94 raised per $1 spent on fundraising; rating input score 30; 30th percentile among comparable filings
Transparency & Controls
- Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 63rd percentile among comparable filings
- Pay-setting controls: Limited
- Foreign activity oversight: Limited
- Grant itemization coverage: Limited
- Major donor itemization: Yes; rating input score 100
- Related-party transparency: Limited
Accountability
- Independent voting board: 100%; rating input score 100; 63rd percentile among comparable filings
- Governance controls: 8 of 8 controls in place; rating input score 100
- Conflict-of-interest policy: Pass
- Whistleblower policy: Pass
- Document-retention policy: Pass
- CEO compensation review process: Pass
- Other executive compensation review process: NotApplicable
- Form 990 shared with the board: Pass
- Board meeting minutes documented: Pass
- Audit committee oversight: Pass
- Independent financial-statement audit: Pass
Sustainability
- Operating margin: 15.3%; rating input score 71; 71st percentile among comparable filings
- Total-asset coverage ratio: 2.34; rating input score 67; 67th percentile among comparable filings
- Liabilities to assets ratio: 0.02; rating input score 81; 81st percentile among comparable filings
- Officer compensation ratio: 17.4%; rating input score 15; 15th percentile among comparable filings
Growth
- Program expense growth: 2.2% per year; rating input score 100; 23rd percentile among comparable filings
- Revenue growth: 0.5% per year; rating input score 100; 13th percentile among comparable filings
- Asset growth: -0.9% per year; rating input score 0; 10th percentile among comparable filings
Details
- What they do: 4 programs and campaigns described on the official site · 2 operating locations identified
- Where the money goes: 70.4% of revenue deployed · 76.6% of spending went to programs
- Governance: 11 of 11 board members independent · 8 of 8 filing controls reported
- Programs: 4 filed program accomplishments · $1.7M in reported program spending
- Leadership: top reported pay $136K · 14 people listed
- Consistency: 31 of 31 current checks pass
- Schedules: 7 filed schedules · includes major donors
- Filing history: 14 filing years from 2010 to 2024
- Contacts: How to reach this organization
- Money network: 3 filed money-flow records
- Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
- People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.
- Staff and benefit plans: Retirement and health plans the organization files with the Department of Labor, and the people in them.
Key Signals
Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.
- Moderate — Financial Efficiency: Fundraising efficiency scored 30/100.
- High — Growth: Asset growth scored 0/100.
- High — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 15/100.