National Council of Jewish Women Inc San Francisco Section

Nonprofit profile at a glance

EIN
941156613
IRS 990 coverage
2014–2024
Forms available
Form 990 2024
Location
San Francisco, CA, USA
Phone
4153464600
Rating
74
Verdict
SUPPORTED
Rating confidence
Moderate
Sector
Crime Prevention
Affiliation
Judaism

Official website

Reported finances

Revenue
$310,068
Expenses
$358,398
Assets
$874,111
Liabilities
$4,094

Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Amounts in USD.

Leadership & pay

16 people listed

Executive titles in this filing

  • Nancy Kirshner-Rodriguez (Vice President)
  • Dena Gardi (Vice President)
  • Linda Kurtz (President)
  • Teddi Silverman (Vice President)

People named in this filing

  • Andrea Carlise (Gen. Director)
  • Benita Hopkins (Gen. Director)
  • Bonnie Lindauer (Gen. Director)

Selected names, not a complete roster or a statement of current roles. Open leadership details for the complete filed list.

Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.

Overview

Mission

Volunteer organization that works to improve the quality of life for women, children and families, and ensure individual rights and freedoms through advocacy and education.

What it reported doing in 2024

Anti-Human Trafficking Prevention and Direct Service to SurvivorsThrough this program NCJW San Francisco Section (NCJW-SF) has been instrumental in bringing the issue of human trafficking to the forefront of the Bay Area community's thoughts and actions. Through advocacy, education and collaboration building NCJW-SF members have been working to mobilize the local community for an organized response to human trafficking. Since 2006, NCJW-SF has initiated and assisted the founding of two major collaborations and is currently serving as their administrator and coordinating agency. In addition, NCJW-SF has been working extensively on strengthening the survivor assistance and access to resources and services through operating the 24/7 Bay Area Human Trafficking Hotline for Survivors and Community.1.The Jewish Coalition to End Human Trafficking (JCEHT,) chaired and staffed by NCJW-SF, is an educational, advocacy organization that works on broadening the understanding in the Jewish Community regarding the crime of human trafficking and supporting the local providers of service to trafficking survivors. JCEHT's objectives are two-fold: partner with other interfaith and human rights groups, non-profits, government officials and law enforcement agencies to raise awareness of and act against human trafficking; and advocate for consistent and comprehensive anti-trafficking legislation that provides for strict criminal penalties for traffickers as well as for protection and rehabilitation for trafficking survivors.2.The San Francisco Collaborative Against Human Trafficking (SFCAHT), co-chaired, coordinated and staffed by NCJW-SF is a coalition of over 70 agencies from the law enforcement, government, and non-profit sectors. A central objective of SFCAHT is to raise awareness about human trafficking and increase anti-trafficking community efforts by providing outreach and education both to those who are directly impacted by the crime and to the Bay Area professionals and community at large. A special emphasis is put on SFCAHT work with teenagers and generally with youth, through the teen activism and leadership program and the SFCAHT Student Alliance. In addition, SFCAHT addresses the challenges in fighting transnational human trafficking through collaboration with the consular offices based in San Francisco and international partners, such as the relevant UN and EU offices and commissions. In their key leadership roles on the Collaborative, NCJW-SFs passionate activists and highly qualified staff have been working tirelessly to help eradicate human trafficking in San Francisco and Bay Area through collaboration, education, outreach, and advocacy. NCJW-SFs leaders involved in the convening for the creation of the Collaborative have been awarded and especially recognized by the San Francisco Mayor's office for their initiative and extraordinary achievement.3.The 24/7 Bay Area Human Trafficking Hotline and Referral Mechanism for Survivors and Community confidentially and safely connect survivors of human trafficking and their support networks with resources and protections. The Hotline also serves affected/concerned citizens who report suspected human trafficking activities or want to learn more about recognizing the signs of the crime. Through its survivor informed services and collaboration with the local and national stakeholders, the hotline empowers survivors to regain control, navigate their options, and determine their next steps. It provides interpretation in over 240 languages to accommodate needs of immigrant survivors.

Operating model

Revenue model
Donor-supported. 92% of the money available for current operations came from contributions and gifts.
Distribution model
Direct operator. The filing allocates 100% of reported program-service expenses outside its grant, affiliate-payment, and member-benefit lines. This expense classification does not rule out separately announced grant awards.

The verdict

SUPPORTED - The filed numbers largely add up and most voting board members are independent. A relatively small share of available resources goes toward mission work and a relatively small share of total spending goes to programs.

Rating breakdown

  • Financial Efficiency: 59
  • Transparency & Controls: 92
  • Accountability: 82
  • Sustainability: 41
  • Growth: 80

Detailed rating inputs

Financial Efficiency

  • Mission deployment rate: 59.1%; rating input score 59
  • Program expense ratio: 54.6%; rating input score 55
  • Fundraising efficiency: $36.41 raised per $1 spent on fundraising; rating input score 71; 71st percentile among comparable filings

Transparency & Controls

  • Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 64th percentile among comparable filings
  • Pay-setting controls: Limited
  • Foreign activity oversight: Limited
  • Grant itemization coverage: Limited
  • Major donor itemization: Yes; rating input score 100
  • Related-party transparency: Limited

Accountability

  • Independent voting board: 100%; rating input score 100; 63rd percentile among comparable filings
  • Governance controls: 4 of 7 controls in place; rating input score 57
    • Conflict-of-interest policy: Pass
    • Whistleblower policy: Pass
    • Document-retention policy: Fail
    • CEO compensation review process: NotApplicable
    • Other executive compensation review process: NotApplicable
    • Form 990 shared with the board: Pass
    • Board meeting minutes documented: Pass
    • Audit committee oversight: Missing
    • Independent financial-statement audit: Fail

Sustainability

  • Operating margin: -15.6%; rating input score 17; 17th percentile among comparable filings
  • Total-asset coverage ratio: 2.44; rating input score 64; 64th percentile among comparable filings
  • Liabilities to assets ratio: 0; rating input score 50; 50th percentile among comparable filings
  • Officer compensation ratio: 0%; rating input score 69; 69th percentile among comparable filings

Growth

  • Program expense growth: 7.6% per year; rating input score 100; 63rd percentile among comparable filings
  • Revenue growth: 13% per year; rating input score 100; 79th percentile among comparable filings
  • Asset growth: -1.1% per year; rating input score 0; 21st percentile among comparable filings

Details

  • Where the money goes: 59.1% of revenue deployed · 54.6% of spending went to programs
  • Governance: 18 of 18 board members independent · 4 of 7 filing controls reported
  • Programs: 2 filed program accomplishments · $196K in reported program spending
  • Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 16 people listed
  • Consistency: 27 of 27 current checks pass
  • Schedules: 5 filed schedules · includes major donors
  • Filing history: 11 filing years from 2014 to 2024
  • Contacts: How to reach this organization
  • Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
  • People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.

Key Signals

Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.

  • Review — Financial Efficiency: Mission deployment rate scored 59/100.
  • Review — Financial Efficiency: Program expense ratio scored 55/100.
  • Review — Accountability: Governance controls: 2 of 6 not reported.
  • High — Sustainability: Operating margin scored 17/100.
  • High — Growth: Asset growth scored 0/100.
  • Review — Sustainability: Liabilities to assets ratio scored 50/100.