National Council for Advanced Manufacturing
Nonprofit profile at a glance
- EIN
- 521788801
- IRS 990-EZ coverage
- 2013–2018
- Forms available
- Form 990-EZ 2018
- Location
- Washington, DC, USA
- Phone
- 2023671178
- Rating
- 41
- Verdict
- MIXED
- Rating confidence
- Moderate
- Sector
- Chambers of Commerce & Business Leagues
Reported finances
- Revenue
- $27,502
- Expenses
- $89,739
- Assets
- $18,755
- Liabilities
- $170,782
Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2018. Amounts in USD.
Leadership & pay
11 people listed
Executive titles in this filing
- RUSTY PATTERSON (CHAIRMAN & CEO)
- LEO REDDY FOUNDER AND (FORMER CEO, UNTIL 3/8/18)
People named in this filing
- RUSTY PATTERSON (CHAIRMAN & CEO)
- DAVID FUCHS (TREASURER)
- BRIG GEN ROBERT E MANSFIELD JR (DIRECTOR)
Selected names, not a complete roster or a statement of current roles. Open leadership details for the complete filed list.
Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2018. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.
Overview
Mission
National council for advanced manufacturing (nacfam) is dedicated to enhancing the productivity of all tiers of u.s.-based manufacturing by providing leadership in workforce skills, standards development, technology development and deployment, and partnership building between public and private enterprises.
What it reported doing in 2018
Contract services and education - nacfam has helped build national policies and programs designed to accelerate the development and deployment of advanced technologies and related workforce skills. Nacfam's actvities includes "fee for service" projects and grant awards. Nacfam focuses on research, collaboration, and disseminaton of topics pertinent to the advanced manufacturing community. Nacfam also provides education on issues important to the advanced manufacturing community and provides communication through news-letters, editorials, economic summaries, white papers and speaking engagements.
Operating model
- Revenue model
- Donor-supported. 100% of the money available for current operations came from contributions and gifts.
- Distribution model
- No current program activity. The filing reports no program spending for the current year.
The verdict
MIXED - The filed numbers largely add up. A relatively small share of available resources goes toward mission work and a relatively small share of total spending goes to programs.
Rating breakdown
- Financial Efficiency: 0
- Transparency & Controls: 100
- Sustainability: 7
- Growth: 20
Detailed rating inputs
Financial Efficiency
- Mission deployment rate: 0%; rating input score 0
- Program expense ratio: 0%; rating input score 0
Transparency & Controls
- Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 51st percentile among comparable filings
- Major donor itemization: Yes; rating input score 100
Sustainability
- Operating margin: -226.3%; rating input score 4; 4th percentile among comparable filings
- Total-asset coverage ratio: 0.21; rating input score 16; 16th percentile among comparable filings
- Liabilities to assets ratio: 9.11; rating input score 1; 1st percentile among comparable filings
- Officer compensation ratio: 35.3%; rating input score 5; 5th percentile among comparable filings
Growth
- Program expense growth: -24.8% per year; rating input score 0; 15th percentile among comparable filings
- Revenue growth: -12% per year; rating input score 0; 23rd percentile among comparable filings
- Asset growth: 2.2% per year; rating input score 100; 50th percentile among comparable filings
Details
- Where the money goes: 0% of revenue deployed · 0% of spending went to programs
- Governance: Filed governance answers
- Accomplishments: 2 filed program accomplishments
- Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 11 people listed
- Consistency: 8 of 8 current checks pass
- Schedules: 3 filed schedules
- Filing history: 6 filing years from 2013 to 2018
- Contacts: How to reach this organization
- Money network: 1 filed money-flow record
- Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
- People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.
Key Signals
Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.
Grant-readiness screening is separate from the live rating, not a measure of program quality. Review the source records before making a grant decision.
- High — Financial Efficiency: Mission deployment rate scored 0/100.
- High — Financial Efficiency: Program expense ratio scored 0/100.
- High — Sustainability: Operating margin scored 4/100.
- High — Growth: Program expense growth scored 0/100.
- High — Growth: Revenue growth scored 0/100.
- High — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 16/100.
- High — Sustainability: Liabilities to assets ratio scored 1/100.
- High — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 5/100.
- High — Grant Readiness: Automatic revocation: this organization had its federal tax-exempt status automatically revoked.