National Community Pharmacists Association
Nonprofit profile at a glance
- EIN
- 361520710
- IRS 990 coverage
- 2013–2024
- Forms available
- Form 990 2024, Form 990-N 2017
- Location
- Alexandria, VA, USA
- Phone
- 7036838200
- Rating confidence
- Limited
Reported finances
- Revenue
- $22,027,665
- Expenses
- $535,107,509
- Assets
- $55,963,332
- Liabilities
- $6,746,703
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Amounts in USD.
Leadership & pay
21 people listed
Executive titles in this filing
- LEA M WOLSONCROFT (PRESIDENT)
- JEFF S HARRELL (PRESIDENT-ELECT)
- HUGH M CHANCY (IMMEDIATE PAST PRESIDENT)
- B DOUGLAS HOEY (CEO)
Highest reported compensation
- B DOUGLAS HOEY (CEO): $696,912 total reported compensation
- MATT SEILER (GENERAL COUNSEL): $321,840 total reported compensation
- KURT PROCTOR (SR VP SI AND PRES. OF THE IC): $289,885 total reported compensation
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.
Overview
Mission
Ncpa protects and promotes the interests of independent pharmacists whose current and future success is vital to their patients, their communities, and the entire healthcare system.
What it reported doing in 2024
Government affairs: ncpa fights for the interests of independent community pharmacists. One of its main activities is education. Ncpa educates federal and state policymakers, health plan sponsors, health care providers, the news media, the public, and other stakeholders about the important role community pharmacists play in america's health care system. Ncpa also engages its members in traditional grassroots activities. When necessary, the association advances the interests of local pharmacists through the judicial system as well. Ncpa members also benefit from exclusive, timely updates on the latest congressional, state, and regulatory changes that affect their businesses.
Operating model
- Revenue model
- Mixed. Its operating money came from several sources; no one source provided a clear majority.
- Distribution model
- Cannot be determined from the filing. The filing does not provide enough consistent spending detail to tell whether the nonprofit works directly or through others.
The verdict
- The available evidence is not sufficient to produce an overall rating for this filing. This is not a warning sign.
Rating breakdown
- Financial Efficiency: NotEnoughData
- Transparency & Controls: 88
- Accountability: 43
- Sustainability: 19
- Growth: 60
Detailed rating inputs
Financial Efficiency
- Mission deployment rate: Limited
- Program expense ratio: Limited
- Fundraising efficiency: Limited
Transparency & Controls
- Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 62nd percentile among comparable filings
- Pay-setting controls: 3 of 6 controls in place; rating input score 50
- Compensation committee: Pass
- Independent consultant: Missing
- Other Form 990s reviewed: Missing
- Written employment contract: Missing
- Compensation survey or study: Pass
- Board or committee approval: Pass
- Foreign activity oversight: Limited
- Grant itemization coverage: 100%; rating input score 100; 42nd percentile among comparable filings
- Major donor itemization: Yes; rating input score 100
- Related-party transparency: Limited
Accountability
- Independent voting board: 10%; rating input score 10; 6th percentile among comparable filings
- Governance controls: 8 of 9 controls in place; rating input score 89
- Conflict-of-interest policy: Pass
- Whistleblower policy: Pass
- Document-retention policy: Pass
- CEO compensation review process: Pass
- Other executive compensation review process: Fail
- Form 990 shared with the board: Pass
- Board meeting minutes documented: Pass
- Audit committee oversight: Pass
- Independent financial-statement audit: Pass
Sustainability
- Operating margin: -2,329.3%; rating input score 0; 0th percentile among comparable filings
- Total-asset coverage ratio: 0.1; rating input score 2; 2nd percentile among comparable filings
- Liabilities to assets ratio: 0.12; rating input score 70; 70th percentile among comparable filings
- Officer compensation ratio: 0.7%; rating input score 88; 88th percentile among comparable filings
Growth
- Program expense growth: Limited
- Revenue growth: 1.9% per year; rating input score 100; 17th percentile among comparable filings
- Asset growth: 6.3% per year; rating input score 100; 44th percentile among comparable filings
Details
- Where the money goes: Financial trends and filed revenue, expense, asset, and liability detail
- Governance: 1 of 10 board members independent · 8 of 9 filing controls reported
- Programs: 3 filed program accomplishments
- Leadership: top reported pay $697K · 21 people listed · 3 of 6 pay-setting controls reported
- Highest-paid contractors: 4 contractors listed · $1.2M reported
- Consistency: 14 of 14 current checks pass
- Schedules: 7 filed schedules · includes major donors, grants, and executive pay
- Filing history: 12 filing years from 2013 to 2024
- Contacts: How to reach this organization
- Money network: 28 filed money-flow records
- Related organizations: 12 filed related-organization links
- Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
- People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.
- Staff and benefit plans: Retirement and health plans the organization files with the Department of Labor, and the people in them.
Key Signals
Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.
- High — Accountability: Independent voting board scored 10/100.
- High — Sustainability: Operating margin scored 0/100.
- High — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 2/100.
- Review — Accountability: Governance controls: Other executive compensation review process not reported.