National Committee for the Prevention of Elder Abuse

Nonprofit profile at a glance

EIN
043023122
IRS 990-EZ coverage
2016–2017
Forms available
Form 990 2014, Form 990-EZ 2017
Location
Washington, DC, USA
Phone
2024649481
Rating
77
Verdict
SUPPORTED
Rating confidence
Moderate
Sector
Seniors' Rights

Reported finances

Revenue
$18,102
Expenses
$13,034
Assets
$43,925

Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2017. Amounts in USD.

Leadership & pay

16 people listed

Executive titles in this filing

  • MARGARET BAKER (Vice President)
  • TRUDY GREGORIE (Executive Director)

People named in this filing

  • MARGARET BAKER (Vice President)
  • DENISE ARMSTRONG (Treasurer)
  • JAMES VANDEN BOSCH (Secretary)

Selected names, not a complete roster or a statement of current roles. Open leadership details for the complete filed list.

Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2017. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.

Overview

Mission

The mission of NCPEA is to prevent abuse, neglect and exploitation of older persons and adults with disabilities. This to be done through research, advocacy, public and professional awareness,

What it reported doing in 2017

The organization has published issues of "The Journal of Elder Abuse" Has also provided training at the conferences. Disseminates abuse information, and continues development of mentorship programs.

Operating model

Revenue model
Donor-supported. 88% of the money available for current operations came from contributions and gifts.
Distribution model
Direct operator. The filing allocates 100% of reported program-service expenses outside its grant, affiliate-payment, and member-benefit lines. This expense classification does not rule out separately announced grant awards.

The verdict

SUPPORTED - A large share of available resources goes toward mission work and the filed numbers largely add up. Program spending has declined or grown slowly and revenue has declined or grown slowly.

Rating breakdown

  • Financial Efficiency: 82
  • Transparency & Controls: 82
  • Sustainability: 68
  • Growth: 0

Detailed rating inputs

Financial Efficiency

  • Mission deployment rate: 72.4%; rating input score 72
  • Program expense ratio: 100%; rating input score 100

Transparency & Controls

  • Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 51st percentile among comparable filings
  • Major donor itemization: Limited

Sustainability

  • Operating margin: 28%; rating input score 82; 82nd percentile among comparable filings
  • Total-asset coverage ratio: 3.37; rating input score 77; 77th percentile among comparable filings
  • Liabilities to assets ratio: Limited
  • Officer compensation ratio: 0%; rating input score 56; 56th percentile among comparable filings

Growth

  • Program expense growth: -1.4% per year; rating input score 0; 46th percentile among comparable filings
  • Revenue growth: -35.6% per year; rating input score 0; 9th percentile among comparable filings
  • Asset growth: -22.7% per year; rating input score 0; 10th percentile among comparable filings

Details

  • Where the money goes: 72.4% of revenue deployed · 100% of spending went to programs
  • Governance: Filed governance answers
  • Accomplishments: 1 filed program accomplishment · $13K in reported program spending
  • Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 16 people listed
  • Consistency: 7 of 7 current checks pass
  • Schedules: 2 filed schedules
  • Filing history: 2 filing years from 2016 to 2017
  • Contacts: How to reach this organization
  • Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
  • People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.

Key Signals

Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.

Grant-readiness screening is separate from the live rating, not a measure of program quality. Review the source records before making a grant decision.

  • High — Growth: Program expense growth scored 0/100.
  • High — Growth: Revenue growth scored 0/100.
  • High — Growth: Asset growth scored 0/100.
  • Review — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 56/100.
  • High — Grant Readiness: Automatic revocation: this organization had its federal tax-exempt status automatically revoked.