National Coalition of 100 Black Women Inc
Nonprofit profile at a glance
- EIN
- 824603213
- IRS 990-EZ coverage
- 2024–2024
- Forms available
- Form 990 2023, Form 990-EZ 2024, Form 990-N 2020
- Location
- Dfw Airport, TX, USA
- Phone
- 2252001449
- Rating
- 52
- Verdict
- MIXED
- Rating confidence
- Moderate
- Sector
- Civil Rights
Reported finances
- Revenue
- $60,228
- Expenses
- $57,266
- Assets
- $60,152
- Liabilities
- $25,200
Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Amounts in USD.
Leadership & pay
6 people listed
Executive titles in this filing
- SONYA IRBY (PRESIDENT)
- KEESHA DILLARD (FIRST VICE PRESIDENT)
- RHETTA WASHINGTON-MCCOY (SECOND VICE PRESIDENT)
- CATRINA PULLUM (THIRD VICE PRESIDENT)
People named in this filing
- SONYA IRBY (PRESIDENT)
- KEESHA DILLARD (FIRST VICE PRESIDENT)
- RHETTA WASHINGTON-MCCOY (SECOND VICE PRESIDENT)
Selected names, not a complete roster or a statement of current roles. Open leadership details for the complete filed list.
Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.
Overview
Mission
To advocate on behalf of black women and girls to promote leadership development and gender equity in the areas of health, education and economic empowerment
What it reported doing in 2024
Advocated on behalf of black women and girls through targeted leadership development, mentoring(metamorphosis), economic empowerment, civic engagement, and health initiatives. Includes awarding$8,000 in higher education scholarships
Operating model
- Revenue model
- Mixed. Its operating money came from several sources; no one source provided a clear majority.
- Distribution model
- Multi-channel. The nonprofit split its reported program spending across 40% for direct work, 34% for grants, and 26% for member benefits.
The verdict
MIXED - The filed numbers largely add up. A relatively small share of available resources goes toward mission work and a relatively small share of total spending goes to programs.
Rating breakdown
- Financial Efficiency: 40
- Transparency & Controls: 73
- Sustainability: 47
- Growth: 0
Detailed rating inputs
Financial Efficiency
- Mission deployment rate: 38.6%; rating input score 39
- Program expense ratio: 40.6%; rating input score 41
Transparency & Controls
- Consistency checks: 88.9%; rating input score 89; 2nd percentile among comparable filings
- Major donor itemization: Limited
Sustainability
- Operating margin: 4.9%; rating input score 54; 54th percentile among comparable filings
- Total-asset coverage ratio: 1.05; rating input score 48; 48th percentile among comparable filings
- Liabilities to assets ratio: 0.42; rating input score 10; 10th percentile among comparable filings
- Officer compensation ratio: 0%; rating input score 56; 56th percentile among comparable filings
Growth
- Program expense growth: Limited
- Revenue growth: -7.2% per year; rating input score 0; 29th percentile among comparable filings
- Asset growth: -3.8% per year; rating input score 0; 27th percentile among comparable filings
Details
- Where the money goes: 38.6% of revenue deployed · 40.6% of spending went to programs
- Governance: Filed governance answers
- Accomplishments: 1 filed program accomplishment · $23K in reported program spending
- Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 6 people listed
- Consistency: 9 of 9 current checks pass
- Schedules: 3 filed schedules
- Contacts: How to reach this organization
- Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
- People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.
Key Signals
Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.
- Moderate — Financial Efficiency: Mission deployment rate scored 39/100.
- Moderate — Financial Efficiency: Program expense ratio scored 41/100.
- High — Growth: Revenue growth scored 0/100.
- High — Growth: Asset growth scored 0/100.
- Review — Sustainability: Operating margin scored 54/100.
- Moderate — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 48/100.
- High — Sustainability: Liabilities to assets ratio scored 10/100.
- Review — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 56/100.