National Charity League Inc Tulsa Midtown Chapter
Nonprofit profile at a glance
- EIN
- 461856802
- IRS 990-EZ coverage
- 2021–2024
- Forms available
- Form 990-EZ 2024
- Location
- Tulsa, OK, USA
- Phone
- 9186292709
- Rating
- 72
- Verdict
- SUPPORTED
- Rating confidence
- Moderate
- Sector
- Philanthropy, Charity, Voluntarism Promotion
Reported finances
- Revenue
- $67,865
- Expenses
- $71,153
- Assets
- $195,510
- Liabilities
- $59,118
Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Amounts in USD.
Leadership & pay
11 people listed
Executive titles in this filing
- Lisa Crawford (President)
- Ashley Martens (President Elect)
People named in this filing
- Lisa Crawford (President)
- Ashley Martens (President Elect)
- Christy Reece (Secretary)
Selected names, not a complete roster or a statement of current roles. Open leadership details for the complete filed list.
Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.
Overview
Mission
National charity league, inc. Tulsa midtown chapter's primary purpose is to foster mother/daughter relationships in a philanthropic organization committed to community service, leadership development and cultural experiences. Currently our mother-daughter teams serve over 20 philanthropies including but not limited to nonprofits such as the local food bank, emergency infant services, salvation army and life senior services. All members hold a job in the organization and receive training. Monthly meetings are held and provide all members educational speakers and cultural activities. Speakers focus on the philanthropic partners and issues facing mothers and daughters.
What it reported doing in 2024
Mother/Daughter bonding, leadership, development and cultural experiences in a philanthropic organization. Approximately 150 mothers and 175 daughters in grades 7-12.
Operating model
- Revenue model
- Cannot be determined from the filing. The filing does not provide enough consistent revenue detail to tell how this nonprofit funds its work.
- Distribution model
- Direct operator. The filing allocates 100% of reported program-service expenses outside its grant, affiliate-payment, and member-benefit lines. This expense classification does not rule out separately announced grant awards.
The verdict
SUPPORTED - A large share of available resources goes toward mission work and the filed numbers largely add up. Program spending has declined or grown slowly and revenue has declined or grown slowly.
Rating breakdown
- Financial Efficiency: 72
- Transparency & Controls: 82
- Sustainability: 47
- Growth: 20
Detailed rating inputs
Financial Efficiency
- Mission deployment rate: 73%; rating input score 73
- Program expense ratio: 69.6%; rating input score 70
Transparency & Controls
- Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 52nd percentile among comparable filings
- Major donor itemization: Limited
Sustainability
- Operating margin: -4.8%; rating input score 37; 37th percentile among comparable filings
- Total-asset coverage ratio: 2.75; rating input score 73; 73rd percentile among comparable filings
- Liabilities to assets ratio: 0.3; rating input score 12; 12th percentile among comparable filings
- Officer compensation ratio: 0%; rating input score 56; 56th percentile among comparable filings
Growth
- Program expense growth: -0.3% per year; rating input score 0; 47th percentile among comparable filings
- Revenue growth: -6.2% per year; rating input score 0; 31st percentile among comparable filings
- Asset growth: 0.5% per year; rating input score 100; 41st percentile among comparable filings
Details
- Where the money goes: 73% of revenue deployed · 69.6% of spending went to programs
- Governance: Filed governance answers
- Accomplishments: 2 filed program accomplishments · $50K in reported program spending
- Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 11 people listed
- Consistency: 7 of 7 current checks pass
- Schedules: 2 filed schedules
- Filing history: 4 filing years from 2021 to 2024
- Contacts: How to reach this organization
- Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
- People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.
Key Signals
Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.
- High — Growth: Program expense growth scored 0/100.
- High — Growth: Revenue growth scored 0/100.
- Moderate — Sustainability: Operating margin scored 37/100.
- High — Sustainability: Liabilities to assets ratio scored 12/100.
- Review — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 56/100.